‘The own in the foreign’: reliable surprise - an important function of the media?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bordewijk, J.L. and B. van Kaam (1982). Allocutie: Enkele gedachten over communicatievrijheid in een bekabeld land. Baarn, The Netherlands: Bosch and Keuning.

Cacioppo, J. T. and R. E. Petty (19982). ‘The Need for Cognition’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 116-131.

Deuze, M. (2003) ‘The Web and Its Journalisms: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of News Media Online’, New Media & Society 5: 203-230.

Emmer, M. (2005) Politische Mobilisierung durch das Internet? Eine kommunikationswissenschaftliche Untersuchung zur Wirkung eines neuen Mediums. Munich: Reinhard Fischer.

Eveland Jr, W. P. and S. Dunwoody (2002) ‘An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning from the Web versus Print’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46: 34-53.

Eveland, W. P., Jr. , Seo, M. , and Marton, K. (2002) ‘Learning from the News in Campaign 2000: An Experimental Comparison of TV News, Newspapers and Online News’, Media Psychology 4: 353-378.

Galtung, J. and M. H. Ruge (1965) ‘The Structure of Foreign News: The Presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in Four Foreign Newspapers’, Journal of International Peace Research 1: 64-90.

Hartley, J. (2002) Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.

Hartmann, T. (2005) ‘Die Selektion unterhaltsamer Medienangebote am Beispiel von Computerspielen: Struktur und Ursachen’, unpublished dissertation, Hannover University of Music and Drama.

10.

Hartmann, T. and M. Dohle (2005) ‘Publikumsvorstellungen im Rezeptionsprozess’, Publizistik 50: 287-303.

11.

Hegel, G.W. (1970) Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Bd. 13: Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik I. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

12.

Huizinga, J. (1938) Homo ludens: Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink.

13.

Lazarsfeld, P. F. and R. K. Merton (1948) ‘Mass Communication, Popular Taste and Organized Social Action’, pp. 95-118 in L. Bryson (ed.) The Communication of Ideas. New York: Harper.

14.

Marr, M. (2005) Internetzugang und politische Informiertheit: Zur digitalen Spaltung der Gesellschaft. Constance, Germany: UVK.

15.

McQuail, D. (2005) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, 5th edn. London: Sage.

16.

Merton, R. K. and E. G. Barber (2004) The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

17.

Mindich, D. T. Z. (2005) Tuned Out: Why Americans under 40 Don’t Follow the News. New York: Oxford University Press.

18.

Moles, A. A. (1968) Information Theory and Esthetic Perception. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

19.

Morris, D. (2004) The Naked Woman: A Study of the Female Body. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.

20.

Negroponte, N. (1995) Being Digital. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

21.

Neuman, W. R. (2001) ‘The Impact of the New Media’, pp. 299-320 in W. L. Bennett and R. M. Entman (eds) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984) The Spiral of Silence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

23.

Prior, M. (2005) ‘News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge’, American Journal of Political Science 49: 577-592.

24.

Radvilas, H. (2005) ‘Vermarkter glauben an TV Horizont 23(9 June): 33-33.

25.

Schmitt-Walter, N. (2004) Online-Medien als funktionale Alternative? Über die Konkurrenz zwischen den Mediengattungen. Munich: Reinhard Fischer.

26.

Schoenbach, K. (1997) ‘Das hyperaktive Publikum - Essay über eine Illusion’, Publizistik 42: 279-286.

27.

Schoenbach, K. (2004) ‘A Balance between Imitation and Contrast: What Makes Newspapers Successful? A Summary of Internationally Comparative Research’, Journal of Media Economics 17: 219-227.

28.

Schoenbach, K. (2005a) ‘ “Das Eigene im Fremden”: Zuverlaessige Ueberraschung - eine wesentliche Medienfunktion?’, Publizistik 50: 344-352.

29.

Schoenbach, K. (2005b) ‘The Hyperactive Audience - Still an Illusion: An essay, “Revisited” ’, pp. 267-277 in P. Roessler and F. Krotz (eds) Mythen der Mediengesellschaft - The Media Society and its Myths) Constance, Germany: UVK.

30.

Schoenbach, K. (2005c) ‘Comparative Readership Studies: Constructive Cultural Criticism’, pp. 207-214 in S. Dunwoody , L. B. Becker , D. M. McLeod and G. M. Kosicki (eds) The Evolution of Key Mass Communication Concepts: Honoring Jack M. McLeod. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

31.

Schoenbach, K. and E. Lauf (2002a) ‘The “Trap” Effect of Television and its Competitors’, Communication Research 29: 564-583.

32.

Schoenbach, K. and E. Lauf (2002b) ‘Content or Design? Factors Influencing the Circulation of US and German Newspapers’, Communications 27: 1-14.

33.

Schoenbach, K. and E. Lauf (2004) ‘Another Look at the “Trap” Effect of Television - and Beyond’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 16: 169-182.

34.

Schoenbach, K. , E. de Waal and E. Lauf (2005) ‘Online and Print Newspapers: Their Impact on the Extent of the Perceived Public Agenda’, European Journal of Communication 20: 245-258.

35.

Schulz, W. (2004) ‘Reconstructing Mediatisation as an Analytical Concept’, European Journal of Communication 19: 87-101.

36.

SevenOne Media (2005) ‘Täglich eine Stunde Web: Langzeitstudie “TimeBudget” ’, Research & Results 3: 58-59.

37.

Shapiro, A. L. (1999) The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know. New York: PublicAffairs.

38.

Shaw, D. , M. Schmierbach , J. Hawkins , R. Espino and J. Donovan (2002) ‘Nonrecursive Models of Internet Use and Community Engagement: Questioning whether Time Spent Online Erodes Social Capital’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79: 964-987.

39.

Sloterdijk, P. (1999) Regeln für den Menschenpark. Frankfurt aM: Suhrkamp.

40.

Southwell, B. G. and M. Lee (2004) ‘A Pitfall of New Media? User Controls Exacerbate Editing Effects on Memory’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 81: 643-656.

41.

Stipp, H. (2004) ‘Der Zuschauer und das Beduerfnis nach Interaktivitaet: Ein Blick in die USA’, pp. 121-7 in C. zu Salm (ed.) Zaubermaschine interaktives Fernsehen? TV-Zukunft zwischen Bluetentraeumen und Businessmodellen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

42.

Sunstein, C.R. (2001) Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

43.

Tewksbury, D. (2003) ‘What Do Americans Really Want to Know? Tracking the Behavior of News Readers on the Internet’, Journal of Communication 53: 694-710.

44.

Tewskbury, D. (2006) ‘The Future Holds Less and More for the American News Audience’, Political Communication Report 16-16.

45.

Tewksbury, D. and S. Althaus (2000) ‘Differences in Knowledge Acquisition among Readers of the Paper and Online Versions of a National Newspaper’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77: 457-479.

46.

Tuchman, G. (1978) Making News. New York: Free Press.

47.

Vorderer, P. , C. Klimmt and U. Ritterfeld (2004) ‘Enjoyment: At the Heart of Media Entertainment’, Communication Theory 14: 388-408.

48.

Waal, E. de , K. Schoenbach and E. Lauf (2005) ‘Online Newspapers: A Substitute or Complement for Print Newspapers and Other Information Channels?’, Communications 30: 55-72.

49.

Wellman, B. , A. Q. Haase , J. Witte and K. Hampton (2001) ‘Does the Internet Increase, Decrease or Supplement Social Capital?’, American Behavioral Scientist 45: 436-455.

50.

Zuckerman, M. (1979) Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.