Bonfadelli, H. (2002) ‘The Internet and Knowledge Gaps: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation’ , European Journal of Communication17(1): 65-84 .
2.
Broadcasting Act (1990) Elizabeth II, c. 42, London: HMSO.
3.
Burgelman, J.-C. (1999) ‘The Future of the Welfare State and its Challenges for Communication Policy’, in A. Calabrese and J. Burgelman (ed.) Communication, Citizenship and Social Policy: Rethinking the Limits of the Welfare State. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers .
4.
Burgelman, J.-C. (2000) ‘Regulating Access in the Information Society: Rethinking Public and Universal Service’ , New Media and Society2(1): 51-66 .
5.
Burrows, R. S. Nettleton , N. Pleace , B. Loader and S. Muncer (2000) ‘Virtual Community Care? Social Policy and the Emergence of Computer Mediated Social Support’ , Information, Communication and Society3(1): 95-121 .
6.
Calabrese, A. and M. Borchert (1996) ‘Prospects for Electronic Democracy in the United States: Re-thinking Communication and Social Policy’ , Media, Culture & Society18: 249-268 .
7.
Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising Government, Cm 4310.
8.
Cabinet Office (2000) E. gov. Electronic Government Services for the 21st Century, Report by the Performance and Innovation Unit, Cabinet Office (September), www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/innovation/2000/delivery/intro.htm
9.
Communications Act 2003, Chapter 21. London: HMSO
10.
Digital Television Action Plan (DAP), Dti-DCMS, (December 2001), www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/industry.html
11.
DAP, Version 6.0. (April 2003), www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/industry.html
12.
Garnham, N. (1999) ‘Amartya Sen’s “Capabilities” Approach to the Evaluation of Welfare: Its Application to Communications’, in A. Calabrese and J. Burgelman (eds) Communication, Citizenship and Social Policy: Rethinking the Limits of the Welfare State. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers .
13.
Goodwin, P. (1998) Television Under the Tories: Broadcasting Policy 1979-1997. London: British Film Institute .
14.
Independent Television Commission (ITC) (1991) Invitation to Apply for Regional Channel 3 Licences, 15 February. London: ITC .
15.
Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr) (2003) ‘Public Perceptions of e-Government Services’ , Summary of the ippr seminar 3 June. Available online: www.ippr.org.uk, retrieved August 2003.
16.
Kearns, Ian (2003) ‘Confounding the Sceptics’ , The Guardian4 September. Available online: www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,47466212-110837,00.html
17.
Livingstone, S. with N. Thumim (2003) Assessing the Media Literacy of UK Adults: A Review of the Academic Literature, produced for the Broadcasting Standards Commission, Independent Television Commission, and NIACE, March.
18.
Mansell, R. (2001) ‘New Media and the Power of Networks: Inaugural Professorial Lecture’, Dixon’s Chair in New Media and the Internet, London School of Economics and Political Science , 23 October. Available online: www.lse.ac.uk/collections/media@lse/pdf/rmlecture.pdf
19.
Mansell, R. and U. When (1998) Knowledge Societies: Information Technology for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations/Oxford University Press .
20.
McQuail, D. (1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: Sage .
21.
Office of the e-Envoy (2002a) UK Online Annual Report 2002. Office of the e-Envoy, the Cabinet Office , November.
22.
Office of the e-Envoy (2002b) Channels Framework: Delivering Government Services in the New Economy. Office of the e-Envoy, the Cabinet Office , September.
23.
Timms, D. (2003) ‘Report Calls for Digital Subsidy’ , The Guardian28 August. Available online: www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4741956-105236,00.html
24.
Tuomi, I. (2002) Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
25.
Van Cuilenburg, J. (1999) ‘On Competition, Access and Diversity in Media, Old and New’ , New Media and Society1(2): 183-207 .
26.
Van Cuilenburg, J. and D. McQuail (2003) ‘Media Policy Paradigm Shifts: Towards a New Communications Policy Paradigm’ , European Journal of Communication18(2): 181-207 .