The Impact of Formalization,Role Conflict,Role Ambiguity,and Communication Quality on Perceived Organizational Innovativeness in the Cancer Information Service
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 1998
The Impact of Formalization,Role Conflict,Role Ambiguity,and Communication Quality on Perceived Organizational Innovativeness in the Cancer Information Service
Organizational members' levels of perceived innovativeness represent an insider's viewpoint of the organization 's overall approach to innovation. This study tested a model of the impact offormalization, role ambiguity, role conflict, and communication quality on perceived organizational innovativeness in the Cancer Information Service. Data were gathered from self-report questionnaires completed by organizational members (n = 86) within the Cancer Information Service, a geographically dispersed federal government health information program that was implementing innovative intervention strategies related to disseminating health information to the public. Results indicated that although the predicted model provided a good overallfit to the data, there were some problematic paths. A revised model is offered to reconceptualize the relationships among role conflict, role ambiguity, and communication quality. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for managers and scholars who hope to understand the factors that contribute to perceptions of innovativeness in the new organizationalforms emerging in the health service arena. These data suggest that formalization makes an important contribution to innovation in the highly uncertain world of new organizational forms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiken, M.
, & Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5, 63-82.
2.
Arnold, M. F.
, & Hink, D. L. (1968). Agency problems in planning for community health needs. Medical Care, 6, 454-466.
3.
Baron, R. M.
, & Kenny, D. K. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Brief, A. P.
, & Aldag, R. J. (1976). Correlates of role indices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 468-472.
5.
Damanpour, F.
(1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
6.
Devellis, R.
(1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Dillman, D. A.
(1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225-249.
8.
Farace, R. V.
, Monge, P. R., Bettinghaus, E. P., Eisenberg, E. M., White, L., Kurchner-Hawkins, R., & Williams, K. I. (1982). Communication and coordination among health care organizations: Experiences from the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Control Program. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Department of Communication.
9.
Fisher, C. D.
, & Gitelson, R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the correlates of role conflict and ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 320-333.
10.
Greene, C. N.
(1978). Identification modes of professionals: Relationships with formalization, role strain, and alienation. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 486-492.
11.
Hunter, J. E., & Lim, T. S. (1987). LIMSTAT. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
12.
Hurt, H. T.
, Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1976). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the International Communication Association, Portland, OR.
13.
Hurt, H. T.
, & Teigen, C. W. (1977). The development of a measure of perceived innovativeness. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 1, pp. 377-385). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
14.
Jablin, F.
(1987). Formal organizational structure. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 389-419). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Jackson, S. E.
, & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 16-78.
16.
Johnson, J. D.
(1990). Effects of communicative factors on participation in innovations. Journal of Business Communication, 27, 7-24.
17.
Johnson, J. D.
, Berkowitz, J., Ethington, C., & Meyer, M. (1994). General appendices to the network analysis technical reports. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Department of Communication.
18.
Johnson, J. D.
, Donohue, W. A., Atkin, C. K., & Johnson, S. H. (1995). Differences between organizational and communication factors related to contrasting innovations. Journal of Business Communication, 32, 65-80.
19.
Johnson, J. D.
, Meyer, M., Berkowitz, J., & Ethington, C. (1997). Testing two contrasting models of innovativeness in a contractual network. Human Communication Research, 24, 320-348.
20.
Kahn, R. L.
, Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Occupational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Kanter, R. M.
(1983). The change masters: Innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.
22.
Kelloway, E. K.
, & Barling, J. (1990). Item content versus item wording: Disentangling role conflict and role ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 738-742.
23.
King, L. A.
, & King, D. W. (1990). Role conflict and role ambiguity: A critical assessment of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 48-64.
24.
Luke, R. D.
, Begun, J. W., & Pointer, D. D. (1989). Quasi-firms: Strategic interorganizational forms in the health care industry. Academy of Management Review, 14, 9-19.
25.
Marsden, P. V.
, Cook, C. R., & Knoke, D. (1994). Measuring organizational structures and environments. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 891-911.
26.
Miller, K. I.
(1995). Organizational communication: Approaches and processes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
27.
Monge, P.
, Cozzens, M., & Contractor, N. (1992). Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organizational Science, 3, 250-274.
28.
Morra, M. E.
, Bettinghaus, E. P., & Marcus, A. C. (1993). The first 15 years: What has been learned about the Cancer Information Service and the implications for the future. Monographs: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 14, 177-185.
29.
Morra, M. E.
, Van Nevel, J. P., Nealon, E. O., Mazan, K. D., & Thomsen, C. (1993). History of the Cancer Information Service. Monographs: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 14, 7-33.
30.
Morris, J. H.
, Steers, R. M., & Koch, J. L. (1979). Influence of organization structure on role conflict and ambiguity for three occupational groupings. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 58-71.
31.
Nicholson, P. J., Jr.
, & Goh, S. C. (1983). The relationship of organization structure and interpersonal attitudes to role conflict and ambiguity in different work environments. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 148-155.
32.
Organ, D.
, & Greene, C. (1981). The effects of formalization on professional involvement: A compensatory process approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 237-252.
33.
Pierce, J. L.
, & Delbecq, A. L. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2, 27-37.
34.
Ring, P. S.
, & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90-118.
35.
Rizzo, J. R.
, House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.
36.
Rogers, E.
(1983). The diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
37.
Rogers, E.
(1995). The diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
38.
Rogers, E. M.
, & Agarwala-Rogers, R. (1976). Communication in organizations. New York: Free Press.
39.
Romanelli, E.
(1991). The evolution of new organizational forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 17,79-103.
40.
Schopler, J. H.
(1987). Interorganizational groups: Origins, structure, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 12, 702-713.
41.
Schuler, R. S.
, Aldag, R. J., & Brief, A. P. (1977). Role conflict and ambiguity: A scale analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 111-128.
42.
Van Sell, M.
, Brief, A. P., & Schuler, R. S. (1981). Role conflict and role ambiguity: Integration of the literature and directions for future research. Human Relations, 34, 43-71.
43.
Wager, L. W.
(1962). Channels of interpersonal and mass communication in the organizational setting: Studying the diffusion of information about a unique organizational change. Sociological Inquiry, 31, 88-107.
