Since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the courts have ruled that sponsors of job entry assessment procedures must demonstrate the absence of discrimination against minorities. If an assessment discriminates, the courts may prohibit the use of the assessment unless the assessment is linked to ajob analysis and exhibits validity. In 1994, the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) instituted a three-step USMLE examination program as a single pathway for medical licensure. The Step I examination is not linked to a physician job analysis, exhibits lower scores for minority groups, and lacks construct validity. To avoid the chaos and expense of a protracted legal challenge, the FSMB and the NBME may need to revise the Step I examination, or discontinue it as a requirement of medical licensure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Education Research Association
, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standardsfor educational andpsychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
Baker v. Columbus Municipal Separate School District, 329 F. Supp. 706 (N.D. Midd. 1971), 462 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir. 1972).
3.
Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U. S. 78 (1978).
4.
Bryant, S. K.
(1981). Voluntary certification and the uniformguidelines on selectionprocedures: A potential problem for personnel managers. Health Policy and Education, 2, 135-152.
5.
Cascio, W. F.
(1982). Applied psychology in personnel management (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: Prentice Hall.
6.
Cavanaugh, S. H.
(1991). Response to a legal challenge; five steps to defensible credentialing examinations. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 14, 13-40.
7.
Dawson, B.
, Iwamoto, C. K., Ross, L. P., Nungester, R. J., Swanson, D. B., & Molle, R. L. (1994). Performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners Part I examination by men and women of different race and ethnicity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 674-679.
8.
Derbyshire, R. C.
(1979). State and local agencies. In T. Samph & B. Templeton (Eds.), Evaluation in medical education: Past, present, andflture (pp. 263-291). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
9.
Epps, A. C.
(1990). National boards and the minority medical student. Joumal of the National Medical Association, 82, 161-163.
10.
Federation of State Medical Boards of the U.S., Inc.
, and the National Board of Medical Examiners. (1995). 1996 USMLE United States medical licensing examination: step 1: general instructions, content description, and sample items. Philadelphia, PA: Author.
11.
Flanagan, J. C.
(1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
12.
Flexner. A.
(1974). Medical education in the United States and Canada; a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Buffalo, NY: Heritage Press.
13.
Gael, S.
(1983). Job analysis: A guide to assessing work activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Gonnella, J. S.
, Hojat, M., Erdmann, J. B., & Veloski, J. J. (1993). A case of mistaken identity: Signal and noise in connecting performance assessments before and after graduation from medical school. Academic Medicine, 68 (Supplement), S9-S16.
15.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971).
16.
Helms, L. B.
, & Helms, C. M. (1991). Forty years of litigation involving medical students and their education: I. General educational issues. Academic Medicine, 66, 1-7.
17.
Hubbard, J. P.
, Andrew, B. J., Chase, R. A., & Schumacher, C. F. (1978). Measuring medical education, the tests and the experience of the National Board of Medical Examiners (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
18.
Hubbard, J. P.
, Levit, E. J., Schumacher, C. F., & Schnabel, T. G., Jr. (1965). An objective evaluation of clinical competence, new techniques used by the National Board of Medical Examiners. New England Journal of Medicine, 272, 1321-1328.
19.
Huff, S.
(1974). Credentialing by tests or by degrees: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Griggs v. Duke Power Company. Harvard Education Review, 44, 246-269.
20.
Irby, D. M.
, Fantel, J. I., Milam, S. D., & Schwarz, M. R. (1981). Legal guidelines forevaluating and dismissing medical students. New England Journal of Medicine, 304, 180-184.
21.
Judge rules for student. (1976, September 27). American Medical News, p. 15-15.
22.
Kennedy, W. B.
, Kelly, P. R., Jr., & Hubbard, J. P. (1970). The relevance of National Board Part I examinations to medical school curricula, report to medical schools. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
23.
Lawrence et al. v. South Carolina State Board of Education
, South Carolina Supreme Court Abstracts, pp. 25-28 (1991).
24.
Monahan, T. J.
, & Franchini, A. (1991). The uniform examination pathway to medical licensure [Letter]. New York State Journal of Medicine, 91, 115-116.
25.
Morton, J. H.
(1993). The evolution of medical licensing examinations in the United States. Federation Bulletin, 80, 114-118.
26.
Mosier, C. I.
(1947) A critical examination of the concept of face validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 7, 191-205.
27.
National Board of Medical Examiners
. (1993, February). Information for residency directors about the USMLE step 1 and step 2 examinations and use of scores as factors in residency selection. Philadelphia, PA: Author.
Norcini, J. J.
(1994). Examining the examinations for licensure and certification in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 713-714.
30.
O'Brien, T. L.
(1986). Legal trends affecting the validity of credentialing examinations. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 9, 171-185.
31.
O'Reilly, R. C.
, & Green, E. T. (1992). School law for the 1990s: A handbook. New York: Greenwood.
32.
Portwood, J. D.
, & Schmidt, S. M. (1977, March). Beyond Griggs v. Duke Power Company: Title VII after Washington v. Davis. Labor Law Journal, 28, 174-181.
33.
Shafron, M. L.
(1993). Educational commission for foreign medical graduates. In C. M. Bidese (Ed.), US. medical licensure statistics and current licensure requirements (pp. 53-57). Chicago: American Medical Association.
34.
Sharf, J. C.
(1988). Litigating personnel measurement policy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 235-271.
35.
Swanson, D. B.
, Case, S. M., Melnick, D. E., & Volle, R. L. (1992). Impact of the USMLE step 1 on teaching and learning of the basic biomedical sciences. Academic Medicine, 67, 553-556.
36.
Templeton, B.
(1979). The National Board of Medical Examiners and independent assessment agencies. In T. Samph & B. Templeton (Eds.), Evaluation in medical education: Past, present, andfuture (pp. 121-163). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
37.
Veizaga v. NBRT
. (1980). Notice of pendency of class action and proposed settlement, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Case No. 75 C. 3430, March 18, 1980.
38.
Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976).
39.
Weaver, F. J.
, Ramirez, A. G., Dorfman, S. B., & Raizner, A. E. (1979). Trainees' retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: How quickly they forget. Joumal of the American Medical Association, 241, 901-903.
40.
Wingard, J. R.
, & Williamson, J. W. (1973). Grades as predictors of physicians' career performance: An evaluative literature review. Journal of Medical Education, 48, 311-322.
