Adair, J. G.
, Sharpe, D., & Huynh, C. L. (1989). The placebo control group: An analysis of its effectiveness in educational research. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 67-86.
2.
Bracht, G. H.
(1970). Experimental factors related to aptitude-treatment interactions. Review of Educational Research, 40, 627-645.
3.
Chalmers, L.
, Enkin, M., & Keirse, MJ.N.C. (Eds.). (1989). Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Cochran, W. G.
(1937). Problems arising in the analysis of a series of similar experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, (Suppl. 4), 100, 102-118.
5.
Cook, T. D.
, Cooper, H., Cordray, D. S., Hartmann, H., Hedges, L. V., Light, R. J., Louis, T. A., & Mosteller, F. (1992). The future of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.
6.
Cooper, H. M.
(1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Eysenck, H. J.
(1978). An exercise in meta-silliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517-517.
8.
Federal Computer Products Center
. (1988). Directory of computerized datafiles: A guide to U.S. government information in machine-readable form. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
9.
Fisher, R. A.
(1932). Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). London: Oliver and Boyd.
10.
Gallo, P. S., Jr.
(1978). Meta-analysis-A mixed meta-phor?American Psychologist, 33, 515-517.
11.
Glass, G. V.
(1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
12.
Glass, G. V.
, McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Glass, G. V.
, & Smith, M. L. (1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2-16.
14.
Hedges, L. V.
, & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methodsformeta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15.
Hunter, J. E.
, & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research
. (1992). Guide to resources and services. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
17.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Pearlman, K.
, Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 373-406.
19.
Rosenthal, R.
(1984). Meta-analytic proceduresfor social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Schmidt, F. L.
(1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
21.
Slavin, R. E.
(1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analysis and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15, 5-11.
22.
Smith, M. L.
, & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.American Psychologist, 32, 752-760.
23.
Wachter, K. W.
, & Straf, M. L. (1990). The future of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.
24.
Wilson, V. L.
, & Putnam, R. R. (1982). A meta-analysis of pretest sensitization effects in experimental design. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 249-258.
25.
Wolf, F.
(1986). Meta-analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
