Using Fourth-Generation Evaluation in Nursing

Abstract

Evaluation is disciplined inquiry undertaken to determine the value, including merit and worth, of some entity: a curriculum program, a clinical intervention, an academic course, a care plan. An evaluation is conducted to improve or refine the thing being evaluated (evaluand) or to assess its impactand effectiveness. Evaluation in nursing has been designed using various positivistic and postpositivistic models in the first three "generations" in the evolution of evaluation practice. This article describes a new model of nursing evaluation more consistent with a nursing paradigm than with a traditional, scientific, medical paradigm. Responsive nursing evaluation informs and empowers all those involved in its outcomes (the stakeholders) when framed within the research stance called naturalistic or constructivist inquiry. The fourth-generationevaluation approach of Guba and Lincoln (1989) is consistent with a nursing paradigm and a constructivist approach. Fourth-generation evaluation is presented with specific application to nursing evaluation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Diekelmann, N. , Allen, D. , & Tanner, C. (1989). The NLN criteriafor appraisal of baccalaureate programs: A critical hermeneutic analysis. New York: National League for Nursing.

Eisner, E. W. (1975). The perceptive eye: Toward the reformation of educational evaluation. Stanford, CA: Stanford Evaluation Consortium.

Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Leininger, M. M. (Ed.). (1985). Qualitative research methods in nursing. New York: Grune & Stratton.

Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Reinharz, S. (1981). Implementing new paradigm research: A model for training and practice. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. New York: Wiley.

Scriven, M. (1973). Goal-free evaluation. In E. R. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and the process. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

10.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

11.

Smith, M. C. (1984). Research methodology: Epistemologic considerations. Image, 26, 42-46.

12.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Stufflebeam, D. L. , Foley, W. J. , Gephart, W. J. , Guba, E. G. , Hammond, R. I. , Merriman, H. O. , & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision-making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.

14.

Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.