Evolution of Ethical Principles for Naturalistic Evaluation

Abstract

What are the epistemological underpinnings of the principles which guide the practice of naturalistic evaluation? Are the implications of these principles fully understood by those who purport to use them? What ethical dilemmas are encountered in their application? To examine these questions, the authors trace the historical development of both experimental and naturalistic models. The unique role, tasks and stresses of the evaluatorfunctioning within a naturalistic design are examined. Problems ofprivacyand data gathering techniques are discussed. Benefits and costs of naturalistic evaluation applied in the medical school context are summarized in the areas of curriculum development, understanding ofprogramfunctioning and enhanced involvement by program personnel.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BENEDICT, R. F. (1934) "Anthropology and the abnormal." J. of General Psychology 10: 59-82.

BRANDT, R. M. (1974) Studying Behavior in Natural Settings. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

BRONSTEIN, D. J. , Y. H. KRIKORIAN , and P. P. WIENER (1955) Basic Problems of Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

CAMPBELL, D. T. and J. C. STANLEY (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research on Teaching, in Handbook of Research on Teaching, N. L. Gage (ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally.

CHILDS, J. L. (1950) Education and Morals. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

GUBA, E. G. (1978) Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluation. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation 8, Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles.

GUBA, E. G. and Y. S. LINCOLN (1981) Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

HOUSE, E. R. (1980) Evaluating with Validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

HOUSE, E. R. (1973) The Conscience of Educational Evaluation, in School Evaluation, the Politics and Process, E. R. House (ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

10.

KIRKHART, K. E. (1983) "Moral issues in the conduct of mental health evaluation." Evaluation News 4, 1: 50-53.

11.

ROBBIN, A. (1978) "Ethical standards and data archives." New Directions for Program Evaluation 4: 7-17.

12.

SCRIVEN, M. (1972) "Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation." Evaluation Comment 3,4:1-4.

13.

SNOW, R. E. (1974) "Representative and Quasi-Representative Designs for Research on Teaching." Review of Educational Research 44: 265-292.

14.

STAKE, R. (1975) Evaluating the Arts in Education, a Responsive Approach. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

15.

STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. et al. (1980) Standards for Evaluations of Educational Programs, Projects and Materials. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Assn.

16.

STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. et al. and W. J. WEBSTER (1980) "An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2, 3: 5-20.

17.

TYLER, R. W. (1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

18.

WEBB, E. J. , D. J. CAMPBELL , R. D. SCHWARTZ , and L. SECHREST (1966) Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.