Abstract
Numerous problem areas were encountered in the evaluation of a voluntary second surgical opinion program. Some problems could be handled only on a conceptual level, while others require for their solution the integration of existing with new data sets. (1) Reliance on program participants to provide medical data was sensitivity tested and found to have minimal impact. (2) Program impact on hospital bed reduction was considered in the context of the total market and political environment in the region, and the anticipated duration of the program. A reasonable judgment was that almost the entire fixed component in the per diem cost of anticipated patient days foregone could be written off as part of the cost savings of the program. (3) As hospital reporting systems identify only average per diem costs, a methodology was developed to separate surgical from nonsurgical case costs. (4) Quality of care evaluation will incorporate a substratum of cases for which there exists a control group within the program user population. Outcome measures obtainable through survey interviews were identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.