This methodological study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Received Social Support Scale for Persons with Mental Illness (rSSS-MI), developed by Chronister et al. (2022), by adapting it into Turkish. The study consisted of 274 people who applied to the psychiatry outpatient clinic of a state hospital between April 2023 and April 2024. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Received Social Support Scale for Persons with Mental Illness, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. The Turkish version of the rSSS-MI demonstrated a 3-factor structure consisting of 21-items, and the items’ factor loadings ranged from 0.82 to 0.96. The goodness of fit indices were χ2/df = 3.335, GFI = 0.823, NFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.944, IFI = 0.952, CFI = 0.952, RMSEA = 0.092, and SRMR = 0.024. Additionally, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the rSSS-MI was calculated as 0.98, and item-total score correlation coefficients were between 0.80 and 0.92. These findings indicate that the Turkish version of the rSSS-MI is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
AkyüzH. E. (2018). Confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity: An applied study. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science, 7(2), 186–198.
2.
AlparR. (2022). Applied statistics and validity-reliability (7th ed.). Detay Publishing.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
4.
BeckersT.KoekkoekB.TiemensB.HutschemaekersG. (2020). Measuring social support in people with mental illness: A quantitative analysis of the social network map. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 41(10), 916–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1744205
5.
BeckersT.MaassenN.KoekkoekB.TiemensB.HutschemaekersG. (2023). Can social support be improved in people with a severe mental illness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 42(4), 14689–14699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02694-4
6.
BerkmanL.KawachiI.GlymourM. (2014). Social epidemiology. Oxford University Press.
7.
BoatengG. O.NeilandsT. B.FrongilloE. A.Melgar-QuiñonezH. R.YoungS. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
8.
BrooksH. L.BeeP.LovellK.RogersA. (2020). Negotiating support from relationships and resources: A longitudinal study examining the role of personal support networks in the management of severe and enduring mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-2458-z
9.
BüyüköztürkŞ. (2024). Data analysis handbook for social sciences (31st ed.). Pegem Academy Publishing.
10.
ChronisterJ.ChouC. C.ChenY. I.WuY. J. (2022). Received social support scale for persons with serious mental illness: Preliminary scale development and validation study. Rehabilitation Psychology, 67(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000429
11.
ChronisterJ.ChouC. C.KwanK. L. K.LawtonM.SilverK. (2015). The meaning of social support for persons with serious mental illness. Rehabilitation Psychology, 60(3), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000038
12.
Dalton-LockeC.MarstonL.McPhersonP.KillaspyH. (2021). The effectiveness of mental health rehabilitation services: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 607933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607933
DragesetJ. (2021). Social support. In HauganG.ErikssonM. (Eds.), Health promotion in health care – Vital theories and research (pp. 167–180). Springer.
15.
EkerD.AkarH.YaldızH. (2001). Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 12(1), 17–25.
16.
EkerD.ArkarH. (1995). Factor structure, validity and reliability of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 10(34), 17–25.
17.
EllisonM. L.BelangerL. K.NilesB. L.EvansL. C.BauerM. S. (2018). Explication and definition of mental health recovery: A systematic review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 45(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0767-9
18.
ErdoğanS.NahcivanN.EsinN. (2020). Research process, practice and critical in nursing (4th ed.). Nobel Medical Bookstores.
19.
EvansT. S.BerkmanN.BrownC.GaynesB.WeberR. P. (2016). Disparities within serious mental illness (Technical Brief No. 25). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK368427/
20.
FieldA. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
21.
FitzgeraldS.ChronisterJ.ZhengQ. M.ChouC. C. (2024). The meaning of social support for mental health service-users: The case managers' perspective. Community Mental Health Journal, 61(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01349-5
22.
GagnierJ. J.LaiJ.MokkinkL. B.TerweeC. B. (2021). COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 30(8), 2197–2218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4
23.
GökdemirF.YılmazT. (2023). Processes of using, modifying, adapting and developing likert type scales. Journal of Nursology, 26(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.5152/JANHS.2023.22260
24.
HajjarS. T. (2018). Statistical analysis: Internal-consistency reliability and construct validity. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 6(1), 46–57.
25.
HealeR.TwycrossA. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
26.
HernándezA.HidalgoM. D.HambletonR. K.Gómez-BenitoJ. (2020). International test commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema, 32(3), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306
27.
HuF. H.ZhaoD. Y.FuX. L.ZhangW. Q.TangW.HuS. Q.ShenW. Q.ChenH. L. (2023). Effects of social support on suicide-related behaviors in patients with severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 328, 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.070
28.
JanssenE. M.McGintyE. E.AzrinS. T.Juliano-BultD.DaumitG. L. (2015). Review of the evidence: Prevalence of medical conditions in the United States population with serious mental illness. General Hospital Psychiatry, 37(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.03.004
29.
KhanthavudhC.GrealishA.TzouvaraV.HuangJ.LeamyM. (2023). Implementation and evaluation of recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness in Asia: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 147(4), Article 104591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591
30.
KillaspyH.HarveyC.BrasierC.BrophyL.EnnalsP.FletcherJ.HamiltonB. (2022). Community-based social interventions for people with severe mental illness: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of recent evidence. World Psychiatry, 21(1), 96–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20940
31.
LeeS. N.YuH. J. (2024). Effectiveness of peer support programs for severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare, 12(12), 1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12121179
32.
LeonhardtB. L.HulingK.HammJ. A.RoeD.Hasson-OhayonI.McLeodH. J.LysakerP. H. (2017). Recovery and serious mental illness: A review of current clinical and research paradigms and future directions. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 17(11), 1117–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2017.1378099
33.
MaN.ChenR.BaiY.ZhangW.ChenZ.ZhouJ.CaoY.WenL.ChenX.ZhanX.FanY. (2024). A longitudinal study on the effects of social support on self-stigma, psychiatric symptoms, and personal and social functioning in community patients with severe mental illnesses in China. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 70(5), 957–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241245932
34.
MelroseK. L.BrownG. D.WoodA. M. (2015). When is received social support related to perceived support and well-being? When it is needed. Personality and Individual Differences, 77(4), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.047
35.
Ministry of Health of Turkey (MoH). (2023). Health statistics yearbook 2021.
36.
MohajanH. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University Economic Series, 17(4), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.26458/1746
37.
PeckC. K. H.ThangaveluD. P.LiZ.GohY. S. (2023). Effects of peer-delivered self-management, recovery education interventions for individuals with severe and enduring mental health challenges: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 30(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12813
38.
PeckM. C.SchefflerR. M. (2002). An analysis of the definitions of mental illness used in state parity laws. Psychiatric Services, 53(9), 1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.53.9.1089
39.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2020). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
40.
ReadU. M.KienzlerH.MitwalliS.RabaiaY.SakyiL.Osei-TutuA. (2024). The ambiguities of social inclusion in mental health: Learning from lived experience of serious mental illness in Ghana and the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 59(3), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-023-02555-4
41.
RehmJ.ShieldK. D. (2019). Global burden of disease and the impact of mental and addictive disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-0997-0
42.
RichterD.HoffmannH. (2019). Social exclusion of people with severe mental illness in Switzerland: Results from the Swiss Health Survey. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28(4), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796017000786
43.
Seçerİ. (2018). Psychological test development and adaptation process (2nd ed.). Anı Publishing.
44.
SürücüL.MaslakçıA. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
45.
SwaiP.DesjardinsM.MinjaA.HeadleyJ.LawalaP.NdelwaL.MabojaC.TemuJ.LukensE.KaayaS.BaumgartnerJ. N. (2024). Social support and managing schizophrenia in Tanzania: Perspectives from treatment-engaged individuals and relative caregivers. SSM Mental health, 5(4), Article 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100312
46.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
47.
TavşancılE. (2019). Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS (6th). Nobel Academic Publishing.
48.
Van WeeghelJ.Van ZelstC.BoertienD.Hasson-OhayonI. (2019). Conceptualizations, assessments and implications of personal recovery from mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 42(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000331
49.
VenezianoL.HooperJ. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 67–70.
50.
WaltzC. F.StricklandO. L.LenzE. R. (2016). Measurement in nursing and health research (5th ed.). Springer.
51.
WildmanE. K.MacManusD.KuipersE.OnwumereJ. (2021). COVID-19, severe mental illness, and family violence. Psychological Medicine, 51(5), 705–706. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000490
52.
World Health Organization. (2020). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments.
YusoffM. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 1(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
55.
YusoffM. S. B.ArifinW. N.HadieS. N. H. (2021). ABC of questionnaire development and validation for survey research. Education in Medicine Journal, 13(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2021.13.1.10
56.
ZimetG. D.DahlemN. W.ZimetS. G.FarleyG. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
