Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the measurement invariance of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Subscale (BPNSS) and compare the latent factor means of basic psychological needs between individuals with psychiatric and non-psychiatric disabilities. This cross-sectional study included 97 individuals with psychiatric and 102 individuals with non-psychiatric disabilities. Prior to comparing scores on basic psychological needs across these groups, we evaluated the measure invariance of the BPNSS and confirmed scalar invariance. Individuals with psychiatric disabilities had significantly lower autonomy scores than those with non-psychiatric disabilities. There were no significant mean differences in competence and relatedness between the groups. These findings suggest wide applicability of the BPNSS across individuals with psychiatric and non-psychiatric disabilities. Practitioners should support individuals with psychiatric disabilities to improve their autonomy. Replication with large, diverse samples is crucial to validate the findings and investigate intragroup variances.

Keywords

measurement invariance psychiatric disabilities non-psychiatric disabilities basic psychological needs autonomy competence relatedness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bergamin

Luigjes

Kiverstein

Bockting

C. L.

Denys

(2022). Defining autonomy in psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 801415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.801415

Byrne

B. M.

(2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421

Cáceda

Nemeroff

C. B.

Harvey

P. D.

(2014). Toward an understanding of decision making in severe mental illness. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 26(3), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12110268

Chen

Vansteenkiste

Beyers

Boone

Deci

E. L.

Van der Kaap-Deeder

Duriez

Lens

Matos

Mouratidis

Ryan

R. M.

Sheldon

K. M.

Soenens

Van Petegem

Verstuyf

(2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1

Choi

(2016). An overview of bootstrapping method applicable to survey researches in rehabilitation science. Physical Therapy Korea, 23(2), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2016.23.2.093

Corrigan

P. W.

Larson

J. E.

Rüsch

(2009). Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: Impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry, 8(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00218.x

Corrigan

P. W.

Rüsch

(2002). Mental illness stereotypes and clinical care: Do people avoid treatment because of stigma? Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills, 6(3), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10973430208408441

Dewa

C. S.

Lin

(2000). Chronic physical illness, psychiatric disorder and disability in the workplace. Social Science & Medicine, 51(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00431-1

Freyenhagen

O’Shea

(2013). Hidden substance: Mental disorder as a challenge to normatively neutral accounts of autonomy. International Journal of Law in Context, 9(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552312000481

10.

Hair

J. F.

Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E.

(2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Educational International.

11.

Hamann

Bühner

Rüsch

(2017). Self-stigma and consumer participation in shared decision making in mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 68(8), 783–788. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600282

12.

Huskin

P. R.

Reiser-Robbins

Kwon

(2018). Attitudes of undergraduate students toward persons with disabilities: Exploring effects of contact experience on social distance across ten disability types. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 62(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355217727600

13.

Johnston

M. G.

Faulkner

(2021). A bootstrap approach is a superior statistical method for the comparison of non-normal data with differing variances. New Phytologist, 230(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17159

14.

Jorm

A. F.

(2009). Desire for social distance from people with mental disorders. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670802653349

15.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

16.

Kowalski

R. M.

Peipert

(2019). Public- and self-stigma attached to physical versus psychological disabilities. Stigma and Health, 4(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000123

17.

Moshagen

Bader

(2024). semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models. Behavior Research Methods, 56(4), 2901–2922. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02254-7

18.

Pelto-Piri

Engström

(2013). Paternalism, autonomy and reciprocity: Ethical perspectives in encounters with patients in psychiatric in-patient care. BMC Medical Ethics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-49

19.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

20.

Sadler

M. S.

Meagor

E. L.

Kaye

K. E.

(2012). Stereotypes of mental disorders differ in competence and warmth. Social Science & Medicine, 74(6), 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.019

21.

Sainani

K. L.

(2012). Dealing with non‐normal data. PM&R, 4(12), 1001–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.10.013

22.

Schermelleh-Engel

Moosbrugger

Müller

(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784

23.

Schmitt

Kuljanin

(2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003

24.

Shahwan

Goh

C. M. J.

Tan

G. T. H.

Ong

W. J.

Chong

S. A.

Subramaniam

(2022). Strategies to reduce mental illness stigma: Perspectives of people with lived experience and caregivers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1632–1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031632

25.

Tringo

J. L.

(1970). The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups. The Journal of Special Education, 4(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246697000400306

26.

Wang

(2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119422730

27.

Widaman

K. F.

Reise

S. P.

(1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In Bryant

K. J.

Windle

West

S. G.

(Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10222-009

28.

World Health Organization . (2002). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health

29.

World Health Organization . (2022). Mental disorders. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders

30.

Estabrook

(2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.30 MB

Measurement Invariance of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Subscale Between Individuals With Psychiatric and Non-psychiatric Disabilities

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material