This study aimed to evaluated the reliability and validity of the Turkish adaptation of the Questionnaire of Physiotherapeutic Specific Exercises of Scoliosis (QPSSE). Fifty-one individuals who had been performing scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSEs) for at least two months completed the QPSSE. Validity was analyzed by correlating the QPSSE with the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire and the Scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 (SJ-27). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to estimate test-retest reliability. The QPSSE demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were .90 and .93) and test-retest reliability (ICC = .92, 95% confidence interval [.86–.95]). The QPSSE also demonstrated strong construct validity with the SRS-22 (r = −.57) and SJ-27 (r = −.66) total scores. The Turkish QPSSE is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating the physical functioning, self-image, PSSEs, psychosocial functioning, cognitive functioning, compliance, motivation, and pain-related physiotherapeutic specific exercises of scoliosis in idiopathic scoliosis.
AlanayA.CilA.BerkH.AcarogluR. E.YaziciM.AkcaliO.KosayC.GencY.SuratA. (2005). Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of scoliosis research society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine, 30(21), 2464–2468. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000184366.71761.84
3.
BazancirZ.YagciG.BekN. (2021). Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the Scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 26(6), 974–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2020.10.020
4.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
5.
BerdishevskyH.LebelV. A.Bettany-SaltikovJ.RigoM.LebelA.HennesA.RomanoM.BiałekM.M'hangoA.BettsT.de MauroyJ. C.DurmalaJ. (2016). Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises – a comprehensive review of seven major schools. Scoliosis and spinal disorders, 11(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0076-9
6.
CárcamoM.EspinozaP.RodasM.UrrejolaO.Bettany-SaltikovJ.GrivasT. B. (2023). [Prevalence, risk of progression and quality of life assessment in adolescents undergoing school screening for adolescent idopathic scoliosis]. Andes Pediatr, 94(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.32641/andespediatr.v94i1.3989
7.
DoiT.InoueH.AraiY.ShiradoO.DoiT.YamazakiK.UnoK.YanagidaH.TakeshitaK. (2018). Reliability and validity of a novel quality of life questionnaire for female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Scoliosis Japanese questionnaire-27: A multicenter, cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2025-7
GrivasT. B. (2008). The conservative scoliosis treatment: 1st SOSORT instructional course lectures book (1). Ios Press.
10.
GrivasT. B.DadakaridouD.FokidiS. A.KastrinisA.KostiM.MichasC.OikonomakiM.TheodosopoulosE.GrivaA. M. (2023). Questionnaire of physiotherapeutic specific exercises of scoliosis – QPSSE. In Preprints: Preprints.
11.
GrivasT. B.DadakaridouD.FokidiS. A.KastrinisA.KostiM.MichasC.OikonomakiM.TheodosopoulosE.GrivaA. M. (2024). A questionnaire of physiotherapeutic specific exercises of scoliosis—QPSSE. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(2), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020318
12.
HaherT. R.GorupJ. M.ShinT. M.HomelP.MerolaA. A.GroganD. P.PughL.LoweT. G.MurrayM. (1999). Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine, 24(14), 1435–1440. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199907150-00008
13.
HusmannA.EscorpizoR.FingerM. E. (2020). Examining work-related functioning in a physical therapy outpatient clinic: Validity and reliability of the work rehabilitation questionnaire (WORQ). Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09857-y
14.
KinelE.KotwickiT.PodolskaA.BiałekM.StryłaW. (2012). Polish validation of brace questionnaire. European Spine Journal, 21(8), 1603–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2188-0
15.
LewisC. (2012). A review of non-invasive treatment interventions for spinal deformities. Physical Therapy Perspecfives in the 21st Century–Challenges and Possibilifies, 3, 67–88. https://doi.org/10.5772/38863
16.
LiJ.ChanE. A.LiM.LamY. P.WongA. Y.CheungJ. P. Y.LiY. (2024). “Am I different?” Coping and mental health among teenagers with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A qualitative study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 75, e135–e141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.01.004
17.
MarxR. G.MenezesA.HorovitzL.JonesE. C.WarrenR. F. (2003). A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 56(8), 730–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00084-2
18.
NegriniS.AulisaA. G.AulisaL.CircoA. B.De MauroyJ. C.DurmalaJ.GrivasT. B.KnottP.KotwickiT.MaruyamaT. (2012). 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis, 7(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-3
19.
PengY.WangS.-R.QiuG.-X.ZhangJ.-G.ZhuangQ.-Y. (2020). Research progress on the etiology and pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Chinese Medical Journal, 133(04), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000000652
20.
RomanoM.MinozziS.Bettany-SaltikovJ.ZainaF.ChockalingamN.KotwickiT.Maier-HennesA.NegriniS. (2012). Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(8), CD0. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007837.pub2
WeinsteinS. L. (2019). The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 39(Suppl 1), S44–S46. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001350
23.
YılmazH.ZateriC.Kusvuran OzkanA.KayalarG.BerkH. (2020). Prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Turkey: An epidemiological study. The Spine Journal, 20(6), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.008
