We examined the psychometric properties of the Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Technology (PANT) survey, developed by researchers to track weight management behaviors among youth. Data from 2,039 middle school students (M age = 12.4, SD = .5; 51.4% girls) were analyzed to explore and then confirm the factor structure of the PANT survey. We also examined the bivariate associations between the PANT survey, body mass index (BMI), and the Progressive Aerobic Cardiorespiratory Endurance Run (PACER). Results suggest that the PANT survey is comprised of two factors—Physical Activity and Healthy Choices—each with adequate internal consistency (α = .79 and 0.86, respectively). The Physical Activity subscale appears to be significantly associated with both z-BMI (r = −0.10, p < .001) and the PACER (r = 0.33, p < .001) in the anticipated directions, but the criterion validity of the Healthy Choices subscale is less clear. We discuss these findings and explore future directions for developing meaningful self-report wellness behavior scales for youth.
ArtinoA. R.La RochelleJ. S.DezeeK. J.GehlbachH. (2014). Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE guide No. 87. Medical Teacher, 36(6), 463–474.
2.
BevanN.O’BrienK. S.LatnerJ. D.LinC. Y.VandenbergB.JeanesR.FungX. C. (2022). Weight stigma and avoidance of physical activity and sport: Development of a scale and establishment of correlates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316370
3.
CarlsonJ. A.MignanoA. M.NormanG. J.McKenzieT. L.KerrJ.ArredondoE. M.MadanatH.CainK. L.ElderJ. P.SaelensB. E.SallisJ. F. (2014). Socioeconomic disparities in elementary school practices and children’s physical activity during school. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(3_suppl). https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130430-quan-206
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). QuickStats: Percentage of children aged 2–17 years with 2 hours of screen time per weekday, by sex and age group - national health interview survey, United States, 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7103a6.htm
DingW.CheungW. W.MakR. H. (2015). Impact of obesity on kidney function and blood pressure in children. World Journal of Nephrology, 4(2), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.223
7.
Educational Wellness Consulting. (2010) MATCH wellness: Motivating adolescents with technology to CHOOSE health (NC). Educational Wellness Consulting.
8.
FreedmanD. (2023). _cdcanthro: Calculate various z-scores, percentiles, etc. from the CDC growth charts. R package version 0.1.2 downloaded from. https://github.com/CDC-DNPAO/CDCAnthro
9.
GibsonL. Y.AllenK. L.DavisE.BlairE.ZubrickR. S.ByrneM. S. (2017). The psychosocial burden of childhood overweight and obesity: Evidence for persisting difficulties in boys and girls. European Journal of Pediatrics, 20, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2931-y
10.
HatfieldD. P.ChomitzV. R.ChuiK. K. H.SacheckJ. M.BrownA. A.EconomosC. D. (2017). Impact of a community-based physical activity program on fitness and adiposity among overweight and obese children. Health Promotion Practice, 18(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839916642714
11.
HicksK.PittsS. J.LazorickS.FangX.RaffertyA. (2019). Examining the association between screen time, beverage and snack consumption, and weight status among eastern North Carolina youth. North Carolina Medical Journal, 80(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.80.2.69
12.
HiddingL. M.AltenburgT. M.MokkinkL. B.TerweeC. B.ChinapawM. J. (2017). Systematic review of childhood sedentary behavior questionnaires: What do we know and what is next?Sports Medicine, 47, 677–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0610-1
13.
IrwingP.HughesD. J. (2018). Test development. In IrwingP.BoothT.HughesD. J. (Eds.), The wiley handbook of psychometric testing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch1
14.
LazorickS.CrawfordY.GilbirdA.FangX.BurrV.MooreV.HardisonG. T. (2014). Long-term obesity prevention and the motivating adolescents with technology to CHOOSE healthTM program. Childhood Obesity, 10(1), 25–33.
15.
LazorickS.FangX.CrawfordY. (2016). The MATCH program: Long-term obesity prevention through a middle school based intervention. Childhood Obesity, 12(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2015.0073
16.
LemmensJ. S.ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2009). Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents. Media Psychology, 12(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802669458
17.
LobeloF.PateR. R.DowdaM.LieseA. D.RuizJ. R. (2016). Validity of cardiorespiratory fitness criterion-referenced standards for adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(6), 1222–1229. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0B013E318195D491
MillerG. F.SliwaS.BrenerN. D.ParkS.MerloC. L. (2016). School district policies and adolescents’ soda consumption. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.003
20.
MorenoG.Johnson-SheltonD.BolesS. (2013). Prevalence and prediction of overweight and obesity among elementary school students. Journal of School Health, 83(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12011
21.
PlowmanS. A.MeredithM. D. (Eds.), (2013). Fitnessgram/activitygram reference guide (4th ed.). The Cooper Institute.
22.
PreacherK. J.MacCallumR. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43.
23.
PrinsenC. A.MokkinkL. B.BouterL. M.AlonsoJ.PatrickD. L.de VetH. C.TerweeC. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
24.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
25.
RevelleW. (2018). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University. Retrieved from:https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=psych
26.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
27.
SaffariM.FanC. W.ChangY. L.HuangP. C.TungS. E. H.PoonW. C.LinC. C.YangW. C.LinC. Y.PotenzaM. N. (2022). Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (YFAS 2.0) and modified YFAS 2.0 (mYFAS 2.0): Rasch analysis and differential item functioning. Journal of Eating Disorders, 10(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00708-5
28.
SagarR.GuptaT. (2017). Psychological aspects of obesity in children and adolescents. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 85(7), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-017-2539-2
29.
Saint-MauriceP. F.AndersonK.BaiY.WelkG. J. (2016). Agreement between VO2 peak predicted from PACER and one-mile run time-equated laps. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 87(4), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2016.1216067
30.
SanyaloluA.OkorieC.QiX.LockeJ.RehmanS. (2019). Childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: A public health concern. Global Pediatric Health, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19891305
31.
StanhopeK. K.KayC.StevensonB.GazmararianJ. A. (2017). Measurement of obesity prevention in childcare settings: A systematic review of current instruments. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 11(5), 52–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2016.06.002
32.
StoryM.NanneyM.SchwartzM. (2009). Schools and obesity prevention: Creating school environments and policies to promote healthy eating and physical activity. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 71–100.
33.
TahirM. J.WillettW.FormanM. R. (2018). The association of television viewing in childhood with overweight and obesity throughout the life course. American Journal of Epidemiology, 188(2), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy236
Weihrauch-BlüherS.WiegandS. (2018). Risk factors and implications of childhood obesity. Current Obesity Reports, 7(4), 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-018-0320-0
36.
ZhangG.WuL.ZhouL.LuW.MaoC. (2015). Television watching and risk of childhood obesity: A meta-analysis. The European Journal of Public Health, 26(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv213
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
