Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While collecting high quality data from physicians is critical, response rates for physician surveys are frequently low. A proven method for increasing response in mail surveys is to provide a small, prepaid monetary incentive in the initial mailing. More recently, researchers have begun experimenting with adding a second cash incentive in a follow-up contact in order to increase participation among more reluctant respondents. To assess the effects of sequential incentives on response rates, data quality, sample representativeness, and costs, physicians (N = 1,500) were randomly assigned to treatments that crossed the amount of a first ($5 or $10) and second ($0, $5, or $10) incentive to form the following groups: Group $5/$5; Group $5/$10; Group $10/$0; Group $10/$5; and Group $10/$10. Overall, second incentives were associated with higher response rates and lower costs per completed survey, and while they had no effect on item nonresponse, they increased sample representativeness.

Keywords

physicians response rates mail surveys incentives data quality costs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2016). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (9th ed.). AAPOR. Retrieved May 17, 2020, from https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf

Barclay

Todd

Finlay

Grande

Wyatt

(2002). Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Family Practice, 19, 105–111.

Biemer

Lyberg

(2004). Introduction to survey quality. Wiley.

Birnholtz

J. P.

Horn

D. B.

Finholt

T. A.

Bae

S. J.

(2004). The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 355–362.

Bosnjak

Tuten

T. L.

(2003). Prepaid and promised incentives in web surveys: An experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 208–217.

Cho

Y. I.

Johnson

T. P.

VanGeest

J. B.

(2013). Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: A meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 36, 382–407.

Cull

W. L.

O’Connor

K. G.

Sharp

Tang

S.-f. S.

(2005). Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. Health Services Research, 40, 213–226.

Dillman

D. A.

Smyth

J. D.

Christian

L. M.

(2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Dykema

Jaques

Cyffka

Assad

Hammers

R. G.

Elver

Malecki

K. C.

Stevenson

(2015). Effects of sequential prepaid incentives and envelope messaging in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 906–931.

10.

Dykema

Jones

N. R.

Piché

Stevenson

(2013a). Surveying clinicians by web: Current issues in design and administration. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 36, 352–381.

11.

Dykema

Stevenson

Day

Sellers

S. L.

Bonham

V. L.

(2011). Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 34, 434–447.

12.

Dykema

Stevenson

Klein

Kim

Day

(2013b). Effects of e-mailed versus mailed invitations and incentives on response rates, data quality, and costs in a web survey of university faculty. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 359–370.

13.

Dykema

Stevenson

Kniss

Kvale

González

Cautley

(2012). Use of monetary and nonmonetary incentives to increase response rates among African Americans in the Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16, 785–791.

14.

Dykema

Stevenson

Lein

Rickenbach

(2019, May). Sequential prepaid incentives and cover letter appeals: Effects on response rates, data quality, and costs in an address-based mail survey [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the International Field Directors & Technologies Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.

15.

Edwards

Cooper

Roberts

Frost

(2005). Meta-analysis of randomized trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 987–999.

16.

Edwards

P. J.

Roberts

Clarke

M. J.

DiGuiseppi

Wentz

Kwan

Cooper

Felix

L. M.

Pratap

(2009). Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 1–355.

17.

Flanigan

T. S.

McFarlane

Cook

(2008). Conducting survey research among physicians and other medical professionals: A Review of current literature. In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section (pp. 4136–4147). American Statistical Association. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2008/Files/flanigan.pdf.

18.

Fricker

Tourangeau

(2010). Examining the relationship between nonresponse propensity and data quality in two national household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 934–955.

19.

James

J. M.

Bolstein

(1990). The effect of monetary incentives and follow-up mailings on the response rate and response quality in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 346–361.

20.

Kellerman

S. E.

Herold

(2001). Physician response to surveys: A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 61–67.

21.

Klabunde

C. N.

Willis

G. B.

McLeod

C. C.

Dillman

D. A.

Johnson

T. P.

Greene

S. M.

Brown

M. L.

(2012). Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: A research agenda. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 35, 477–506.

22.

McFarlane

Olmsted

M. G.

Murphy

Hill

C. A.

(2007). Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 30, 170–185.

23.

McLeod

C. C.

Klabunde

C. N.

Willis

G. B.

Stark

(2013). Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000–2010: A review. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 36, 106–126.

24.

Mercer

Caporaso

Cantor

Townsend

(2015). How much gets you how much? Monetary incentives and response rates in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 105–129.

25.

Messer

B. L.

Dillman

D. A.

(2011). Surveying the general public over the internet using address-based sampling and mail contact procedures. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 429–457.

26.

Moore

(2001). The effect of repetitive token incentives and priority mail on response to physician surveys.” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. American Statistical Association. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2001/Proceed/00186.pdf

27.

Singer

(2013). The use and effects of incentives in surveys. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645, 112–141.

28.

Teisl

M. F.

Roe

Vayda

M. E.

(2006). Incentive effects on response rates, data quality, and survey administration costs.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 364–373.

29.

VanGeest

J. B.

Johnson

T. P.

Welch

V. L.

(2007). Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 30, 303–321.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Effects of Sequential Prepaid Incentives on Response Rates,Data Quality,Sample Representativeness,and Costs in a Mail Survey of Physicians

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material