Development and Preliminary Testing of the Food Choice Priorities Survey (FCPS): Assessing the Importance of Multiple Factors on College Students’ Food Choices

Abstract

Understanding factors that influence food choice may help improve diet quality. Factors that commonly affect adults’ food choices have been described, but measures that identify and assess food choice factors specific to college students are lacking. This study developed and tested the Food Choice Priorities Survey (FCPS) among college students. Thirty-seven undergraduates participated in two focus groups (n = 19; 11 in the male-only group, 8 in the female-only group) and interviews (n = 18) regarding typical influences on food choice. Qualitative data informed the development of survey items with a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = not important, 5 = extremely important). An expert panel rated FCPS items for clarity, relevance, representativeness, and coverage using a content validity form. To establish test–retest reliability, 109 first-year college students completed the 14-item FCPS at two time points, 0–48 days apart (M = 13.99, SD = 7.44). Using Cohen’s weighted κ for responses within 20 days, 11 items demonstrated moderate agreement and 3 items had substantial agreement. Factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure (9 items). The FCPS is designed for college students and provides a way to determine the factors of greatest importance regarding food choices among this population. From a public health perspective, practical applications include using the FCPS to tailor health communications and behavior change interventions to factors most salient for food choices of college students.

Keywords

diet food choice survey development college health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Block

J. P.

Gillman

M. W.

Linakis

S. K.

Goldman

R. E.

(2013). “If it tastes good, I’m drinking it”: Qualitative study of beverage consumption among college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(6), 702–706. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.017

Boek

Bianco-Simeral

Chan

Goto

(2012). Gender and race are significant determinants of students’ food choices on a college campus. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 44, 372–378. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2011.12.007

Brunstrom

J. M.

Shakeshaft

N. G.

Alexander

(2010). Familiarity changes expectation about fullness. Appetite, 54(3), 587–590. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.015

Chaplin

W. F.

John

O. P.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1988) Conceptions of states and traits: Dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 4, 541–557.

Cohen

(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.

Connors

Bisogni

C. A.

Sobal

Devine

C. M.

(2001). Managing values in personal food systems. Appetite, 36, 189–200. doi:10.1006/appe.2001.0400

Currie

Molcho

Boyce

Hostein

Torsheim

Richter

(2008). Researching health inequalities in adolescents: The development of the Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC) family affluence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 6, 1429–1436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.024

de Castro

J. M.

(1994). Family and friends produce greater social facilitation of food intake than other companions. Physiology & Behavior, 56(3), 445–455. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(94)90286-0

Deliens

Clarys

De Bourdeaudhuij

Deforche

(2014). Determinants of eating behaviour in university students: A qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health, 14, 53. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/53

10.

DeVellis

R. F.

(2003). Scale development: Theory and applications: Theory and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Ducrot

Mejean

Alles

Fassier

Hercberg

Peneau

(2015). Motives for dish choices during home meal preparation: Results from a large sample of the NutriNet-Santé study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 120–132. doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0270-9

12.

Eaton

D. K.

Kann

Kinchen

Shanklin

Flint

K. H.

Joseph

… Wechsler

(2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries, 61, 1–162.

13.

El Zein

Mathews

Colby

Byrd-Bredbenner

Riggsbee

Zhou

… Vilaro

(2016). Food choice priorities of college freshmen and variation by demographic characteristics: Get FRUVED study. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116, A18. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2016.06.050

14.

Furst

Connors

Bisogni

C. A.

Sobal

Falk

L. W.

(1996). Food choice: A conceptual model of the process. Appetite, 26, 247–266. doi:10.1006/appe.1996.0019

15.

Gamer

Lemon

Fellow

Singh

H. M.

(2012, January 22) Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement [PDF file]. Retrieved from cran-mirror.cs.uu.nl/web/package/irr/irr.pdf

16.

Glanz

Basil

Maibach

Goldberg

Snyder

(1998). Why Americans eat what they do: Taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98, 1118–1126.

17.

Hardman

C. A.

McCrickerd

Brunstrom

J. M.

(2011). Children’s familiarity with snack foods changes expectations about fullness. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 94, 1196–1201. doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.016873

18.

Hubbard

R. R.

Palmberg

Lydecker

Green

Kelly

N. R.

Trapp

Bean

M. K

. (2016). Culturally based communication about health, eating and food: Development and validation of the CHEF scale. Appetite, 96, 399–407. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.024

19.

IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 22.0) (22th ed.). Armonk, NY: Author.

20.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

21.

Levi

Chan

K. K.

Pence

(2006). Real men do not read labels: The effects of masculinity and involvement on college students’ food decisions. Journal of American College Health, 55, 91–98. doi:10.3200/JACH.55.2.91-98

22.

Lewin

(1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. In Guthe

C. E.

Mead

(Eds.) The problem of changing food habits. Report of the committee on food habits. Bulletin of the national research council, no. 108 (pp. 35–65). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

23.

Marquis

(2005). Exploring convenience orientation as a food motivation for college students living in residence halls. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 55–63.

24.

Neumark-Sztainer

Story

Perry

Casey

M. A.

(1999). Factors influencing food choices of adolescents: Findings from focus-group discussions with adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99, 929–937.

25.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

26.

Phillips

J. L.

Rolley

J. X.

Davidson

P. M.

(2012). Developing targeted health service interventions using the PRECEDE-PROCEED model: Two Australian case studies. Nursing Research and Practice, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/279431

27.

Polit

D. F.

Beck

C. T.

Owen

S. V.

(2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459–467. doi:10.1002/nur.20199

28.

R Core Team. (2015). In R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Ed.), R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: Author.

29.

Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

30.

Rubio

D. M.

Berg-Weger

Tebb

S. S.

Lee

E. S.

Rauch

(2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27, 94–104. doi:10.1093/swr/27.2.94

31.

Steptoe

Pollard

T. M.

Wardle

. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25(3), 267–284. doi:10.1006/appe.1995.0061

32.

Swanson

Schoenberg

N. E.

Davis

Wright

Dollarhide

(2013). Perceptions of healthy eating and influences on the food choices of Appalachian youth. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 45, 147–153. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2011.07.006

33.

Thomas

D. R.

(2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748

34.

Tilden

V. P.

Nelson

C. A.

May

B. A.

(1990). Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity. Nursing Research, 39, 172–175.

35.

Topf

(1986). Three estimates of interrater reliability for nominal data. Nursing Research, 35, 253–255.

36.

Wansink

Sobal

(2007). Mindless eating: The 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environment and Behavior, 39, 106–123. doi:10.1177/0013916506295573

37.

Wig

Smith

(2009). The art of grocery shopping on a food stamp budget: Factors influencing the food choices of low-income women as they try to make ends meet. Public Health Nutrition, 12, 1726–1734.

38.

Wouters

E. J. M.

Geenen

(2013). The influence of friendship groups and media on eating behavior and physical activity in adolescents. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health, 6, 249–258. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=2014-01866-002&site=ehost-live

39.

Yeh

Ickes

S. B.

Lowenstein

L. M.

Shuval

Ammerman

A. S.

Farris

Katz

D. L.

(2008). Understanding barriers and facilitators of fruit and vegetable consumption among a diverse multi-ethnic population in the USA. Health Promotion International, 23, 42–51. doi:10.1093/heapro/dam044

40.

Yeh

Matsumori

Obenchain

Viladrich

Das

Navder

(2010). Validity of a competing food choice construct regarding fruit and vegetable consumption among urban college freshmen. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 42(5), 321–327. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2009.08.004

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB