This article briefly reviews the history of approaches to the individualization of instruction, from earlier “system-controlled” methodologies to the current multimedia/hypermedia-based “learner-controlled” approaches. Some of the reasons for the general failure of earlier approaches are analyzed. This leads to the general conclusion that there is no guarantee that the new approaches will be successful, and that several key areas of research and development require attention. The article concludes with a review of current research on one aspect of the suggested agenda - the support of computer-based learning exercises by means of electronic networking, to create a form of “virtual group discussion” environment capable of supporting individual learners with intelligent, constructive feedback and guidance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshmanA.F.ConwayR.N.F. (1989). Cognitive education. London and New York: Routledge.
2.
BarkerJ.TuckerR.N. (1990). The interactive learning revolution. London: Kogan Page.
3.
BodnerG.M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(10), 873–877.
4.
BorkA. (1992). Learning in the twenty-first century interactive multimedia technology. In GiardinaM. (Ed.), Interactive multimedia learning environments. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
ChristopherE.M.SmithL.E. (1987). Management training through gaming: Power, people and problem solving. London: Kogan Page.
7.
CollinsA.BrownJ.S.NewmanS.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL.B. (Eds.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (Pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
De HaanR.F.DollR.C. (1964). Individualization and human potential. In DollR.C. (Ed.), Individualizing instruction. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
9.
DuffyT.M.JonassenD.H. (May 1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology?Educational Technology, 7–11.
10.
EdlingJ.V. (1970). Individualized instruction: A manual for administrators. DCE Publications, Oregon State University, Oregon.
11.
EganK. (1972). Structural communication: A new contribution to pedagogy. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 9(2), 63–78.
EllingtonH.I.AddinallE.PercivalF. (1984). Case studies in game design. London: Kogan Page.
14.
FitzgeraldG.RickL.MilichR. (1986). Computer-assisted instruction for students with attentional difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(6), 376–379.
15.
FlanaganJ.C. (1968). Project Plan. In Technology and innovation in education. New York: Praeger.
16.
GibbonsM. (1971). Individualized instruction: A descriptive analysis. Washington, DC: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
17.
GoodladS.HirstB. (1989). Peer tutoring: A guide to learning by teaching. London: Kogan Page.
18.
GreenblatC.S.DukeR.D. (1981). Principles and practice of gaming-simulation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
GuilfordJ.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.
20.
HarrisC.W. (Ed.) (1960). Encyclopedia of educational research. New York: Macmillan.
21.
HasselbringT.S.GoinL.I.WissickC. (1989). Making knowledge meaningful: Applications of hypermedia. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10(2), 61–72.
22.
HiemstraR.SiscoB. (1990). Individualizing instruction: Making learning personal, empowering, and successful. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
23.
HodgsonA.M. (1974). Structural communication in practice. In RomiszowskiA.J. (Ed.), APLET yearbook of educational and instructional technology. London: Kogan Page.
24.
HooperK. (1988). Multimedia in education. In AmbronS.HooperK. (Eds.), Interactive Multimedia (Pp. 316–330). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
25.
HornR.E. (1973). Introduction to information mapping. Lexington, MA: Information Resources Inc.
26.
HornR.E. (1989). Mapping hypertext: The analysis, organization, and display of knowledge for the next generation of on-line text and graphics. Lexington, MA: The Lexington Institute.
27.
JonesK. (1985). Designing your own simulations. London: Methuen.
28.
JonassenD.H.MandlH. (Ed.) (1990). Designing hypermedia for learning. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
29.
KellerF.S. (1968). Goodbye teacher. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1.
30.
KellerF.S.ShermanJ.G. (1974). The Keller Plan Handbook. New York: Benjamin.
31.
KnowlesM.S. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.
32.
LaurilardD.M. (June 1984). Interactive video and the control of learning. Educational Technology.
33.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Brothers.
34.
MegarryJ. (1979). Developments in simulation and gaming. In HoweA.RomiszowskiA.J. (Eds.), International yearbook of educational and instructional technology 1978/79. London: Kogan Page.
35.
NeillA.S. (1960). Summerhill. New York: Hart.
36.
PostlethwaitS.N. (1972). The audio-tutorial approach to learning. New York: Burgess Publishing Company.
37.
PuschW.S.SleeE.J. (1990). Structural communication: A forgotten application of cognitive theory to instruction. Instructional Developments, 1(2). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University School of Education.
38.
ReevesT.C. (1992). Research foundations for interactive multimedia. In Proceedings of the international interactive multimedia symposium, Perth, Western Australia, January 27–31, 1992. Perth, W. Australia: Promaco Conventions Pty. Ltd.
RomiszowskiA.J. (1990). Hypertext is the answer, but what exactly was the question? In JonassenD.H.MandlH., Designing Hypermedia for Learning, Vol. F67. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
41.
RomiszowskiA.J. (1992). Developing IMM courseware and networks. In Proceedings of the international interactive multimedia symposium, Perth, Western Australia, January 27–31, 1992. Perth, Western Australia: Promaco Conventions Pty. Ltd.
42.
RomiszowskiA.J.ChangE-Cheol (1992). Hypertext's contribution to computer-mediated communication: In search of an instructional model. In GiardinaM. (Ed.), Interactive multimedia learning environments: Human factors and technical considerations on design issues. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
43.
RundellC.R. (1992). To start a school: NASDC as a catalyst for systemic change. Educational Technology, 32(11).
SchonD.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
46.
SearchP. (1894). The pueblo plan of individual teaching. Educational Review, 8.
47.
ShaneH.G. (1962). The school and individual differences. In HenryN.B. (Ed.), Individualizing instruction. (61st Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
ShermanJ.G. (1974). Personalized system of instruction: 41 Germinal Papers. New York: Benjamin.
49.
StreibelM.J. (1991). Instructional plans and situated learning: The challenge of Suchman's theory of situated action for instructional designers and instructional systems. In AnglinG.J. (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present and future, 117–131. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
50.
SuchmanL.A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human/machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
TaylorL.C. (1971). Resources for learning. London: Pergamon Press.
52.
SuppesP. (1968). Computer assisted instruction: Stanford's 1965–66 arithmetic program. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Institute for Mathematical Studies in Social Science.
53.
ThomasR.M.ThomasS.M. (1965). Individual differences in the classroom. New York: McKay.
54.
WallachM.A.KoganN. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt.
