AbelsonA.di SessaA. (1982). Turtle geometryCambridge: MIT Press.
2.
AppleM. W.JungckS. (1990). “You don't have to be a teacher to teach this unit:” Teaching technology, and gender in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal27, 227–251.
3.
BahrC. (1991). Using computer assisted instruction effectively. In GableR.WarrenS. (Eds.), Advances in mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Vol. 4 (pp. 179–209). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, LTD.
4.
BarbourA. (1986). Electronic learning's first annual computer coordinator survey: Who are the nation's computer coordinators and what do they do?Electronic Learning, 5 (5), 35–38.
5.
BeckerH. J. (1983, April). School uses of microcomputers (Issue No. 1). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
6.
BeckerH. J. (1985, July). The second national U. S. school uses of microcomputers survey. Paper presented at the World Conference on Computers in Education, Norfolk, VA.
7.
BeckerH. J. (1987). The importance of a methodology that maximizes falsifiability: Its application to research about Logo. Educational Researcher, 16 (5), 11–16.
8.
BeckerH. J. (1991a). How computers are used in United States schools: Basic data from the 1989 I.E.A. computers in education survey. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7 (4), 385–406.
9.
BeckerH. J. (1991b). When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints. The Computing Teacher, 18 (8), 6–9.
10.
BeckerH. J.SterlingC. W. (1987). Equity in school computer use: National data and neglected considerations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 289–311.
11.
BeishuizenJ. (1991, August). Studying a complex knowledge domain by exploration or explanation. Paper presented at the Fourth European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Turku, Finland.
12.
BoyerE. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper & Row.
13.
BrownA. L.PalinscarA. S. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In BorkowskiJ.DayJ. D. (Eds.). Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practice (pp. 81–132). New York: Ablex.
14.
BruceB.MichaelsS.Watson-GegeoK. (1985). How computers can change the writing process. Language Arts, 62, 143–149.
15.
BudoffM.ThormannJ.GrasA. (1984). Microcomputers in special education. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
16.
CarleerG. J.DoornekampB. G. (March, 1990). A teacher-centered implementation strategy for computer integration. Paper presented at the International Conference on Technology and Education, Brussels. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 325 085).
17.
CarmanG. O.KosbergB. (1982). Educational technology research: Computer technology and the education of emotionally handicapped children. Educational Technology, 22 (2), 26–30.
18.
CarnineD. (1991). Curricular interventions for teaching higher-order thinking to all students: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 261–269.
19.
CarrierC. A. (1984). Do learners make good choices?Instructional Innovator, 29 (2), 15–17, 48.
20.
CarrierC. A.WilliamsM. D. (1988). A test of one learner-control strategy with students of differing levels of task persistence. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 285–306.
21.
CharneyD.RederL.KusbitG. W. (1990). Goal setting and procedure selection in acquiring computer skills: A comparison of tutorials, problem solving, and learner exploration. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 323–342.
22.
CherrylholmesC. H. (1966). Some current research on effectiveness of educational simulations: Implications for alternative strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 4–7.
23.
ClarkR. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.
24.
ClarkR. E. (1985). Evidence for confounding in computer-based instructional studies: Analyzing the meta analyses. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 33 (4), 249–262.
25.
ClementsD. H.NatasiB. K. (1988). Social and cognitive interactions in educational computing environments. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 87–106.
26.
Cochran-SmithM. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Educational Researcher, 61, 107–155.
27.
Cochran-SmithM.KahnJ.ParisC. L. (1989, April). Writing with a felicitous tool. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
28.
CohenA. L.TorgesenJ. K.TorgesenJ. L. (1988). Improving speed and accuracy of word recognition in reading disabled children: An evaluation of two computer program variations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 333–341.
29.
CohenV. B. (1983). Criteria for the evaluation of microcomputer courseware. Educational Technology, 23 (1), 9–14.
30.
CollinsM.CarnineD.GerstenR. (1987). Elaborated corrective feedback and the acquisition of reasoning skills: A study of computer-assisted instruction. Exceptional Children, 54, 254–262.
31.
CollisB. (1988, July). Manipulating critical variables: A framework for improving the impact of computers in the school environmentPaper presented at EURIT '88, Lausanne, Switzerland. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 310 741)
32.
ConnersF. A.DettermanD. K. (1987). Information-processing correlates of computer-assisted word learning by mentally retarded students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 91, 600–612.
33.
Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (1991). 1991 study of school uses of television and video. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
CosdenM. A. (1988). Microcomputer instruction and perceptions of effectiveness by special and regular education elementary school teachers. Journal of Special Education, 22, 242–253.
35.
CosdenM. A.AbernathyT. V. (1990). Microcomputer use in the schools: Teacher roles and instructional options. Remedial and Special Education, 11 (5), 31–38.
36.
CosdenM. A.GerberM. M.SemmelD. S.GoldmanS. R.SemmelM. I. (1987). Microcomputer use within micro-educational environments. Exceptional Children, 53 (5), 399–409.
37.
CosdenM. A.SemmelM. I. (1987). Developmental changes in micro-educational environments for learning handicapped and non-learning handicapped elementary school students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8, 1–13.
38.
CunniffN. (1990). Computing across the curriculum: An integral part of preservice teacher education. National Educational Computing Conference Proceedings.
39.
DaiuteC. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in Teaching of English, 20, 141–159.
40.
DalbyJ.LinnM. C. (1985). The demands and requirements of computer programming: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 253–274.
41.
DaltonB. (1989, June). Tools. Paper presented at the Center for Special Education Technology Fifth Annual Invitational Symposium, Reston, VA.
42.
DaltonB.WinburyN. E.MoroccoC. C. (1990). “If you could just push a button”: Two fourth grade boys with learning disabilities learn to use a computer spelling checker. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 177–191.
43.
DaltonD. W.HannafinM. J.HooperS. (1989). Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37 (2), 15–24.
44.
DavidsonJ.ColesD.NoyesP.TerrellC. (1991). Using computer-delivered natural speech to assist in the teaching of reading. British Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 110–118.
45.
DelquadriJ. C.GreenwoodC. R.StrettonK.HallR. V. (1983). The peer tutoring spelling game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 225–239.
46.
DenhamC.LiebermanA. (1980), Time to learn. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
47.
DickinsonD. K. (1986). Cooperation, collaboration, and a computer: Integrating a computer into a first-grade writing program. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 357–378.
48.
DuffieldJ. A. (1990, April). Problem solving software: What does it teach?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, M.A.
49.
EdyburnD. L. (1991). Fact retrieval by students with and without learning handicaps using print and electronic encyclopedias. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11, 75–90.
50.
EllisE. S.SabornieE. J. (1986). Effective instruction with microcomputers: Promises, practices, and preliminary findings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19 (4), 1–16.
51.
ElkinsR., (1985). Attitudes of special education personnel toward computers. Educational Technology, 25 (7), 31–34.
52.
FeldmanS. C.FishM. C. (1991). Use of computer-mediated reading supports to enhance reading comprehension of high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 25–36.
53.
FishM.FeldmanS. (1987). Teacher and student verbal behavior in microcomputer classes: An observational study. Journal of Classroom interaction, 23 (1), 15–21.
54.
FisherM. D.BlackwellL. R.GarciaA. B.GreeneJ. C. (1975). Effects of student control and choice on engagement in a CAI arithmetic task in a low-income school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 776–783.
55.
FoliartH. H.LemlechJ. K. (March, 1989). Factors affecting use of computers in elementary classrooms: Implications for preservice and inservice education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
56.
GeisertP. G.FutrellM. K. (1990). Teachers, computers, and curriculum: Microcomputers in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
57.
GintherD. W.WilliamsonJ. D. (1985). Learning Logo: What is really learned?Computers in the Schools, 2 (2/3), 73–78.
58.
GlennA.RawitschD. (1984). Computing in the social studies classroom. Eugene, OR: International Council for Computers in Education.
59.
GoldmanS. R.PellegrinoJ. (1987). Information processing and educational microcomputer technology: Where do we go from here?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 144–154.
60.
GovierH. (1988, June). Microcomputers in primary education: A survey of recent research. Occasional Paper ITE/28a/88. Lancaster, England: University of Lancaster.
61.
HammM.AdamsD. (1992). The collaborative dimensions of learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62.
HanleyT. V.ClarkL.WhiteJ. L. (1984, April). Microcomputers in special education: Findings and recommendations from case studies. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Council for Exceptional Children Convention, Washington, DC.
63.
HargisC. H.Terhaar-YonkersM.WilliamsP. C.ReedM. T. (1988). Repetition requirements for word recognition. Journal of Reading, 31, 320–327.
64.
HassJ. M. (1990, April). The discourse of educational computing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
65.
HasselbringT. S. (1984). Using a microcomputer for Imitating student errors to improve spelling performance. Computers, Reading and Language Arts, 1 (4), 12–14.
66.
HasselbringT. S.GoinL. I.BransfordJ. D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20 (6), 1–7.
67.
HativaN.LesgoldA. (1990, April). Computerized management of practice-Can it adapt to the individual learner. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
68.
Helsel-DewertM.MeirackerM. V. (1987). The intelligibility of synthetic speech to learning handicapped children. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 38–44.
69.
HeshusiusL. (1984). Why would they and I want to do it? A phenomenological-theoretical view of special education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 363–368.
70.
HigginsK.BooneR. (1990). Hypertext computer study guides and the social studies achievement of students with learning disabilities, remedial students, and regular education students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 529–540.
71.
HigginsK.BooneR. (1991). Hypermedia CAI: A supplement to an elementary school basal reader program. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11, 1–15.
72.
HofmeisterA. M. (1982). Microcomputers in perspective. Exceptional Children, 49, 115–122.
73.
HofmeisterA.EngelmannS.CarnineD. (1989). Developing and validating science education videodiscs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 665–677.
74.
HorneyM.Anderson-InmanL. (1992, April). Computer-based outlining programs as tools for gathering, organizing, and studying information across the curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
75.
HowellR.SidorenkoE.JuricaJ. (1987). The effects of computer use on the acquisition of multiplication facts by a student with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 336–341.
76.
JohnsonD. L. (Ed.). (1991). Computers in the Schools, 8 (1–3).
77.
JohnsonG.GerstenR.CarnineD. (1987). Effects of instructional design variables on vocabulary acquisition of LD students: A study of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 206–213.
78.
JohnsonR. T.JohnsonD. W.StanneM. B. (1986). Comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23 (3), 382–392.
79.
JonesK. M.TorgesenJ. K.SextonM. A. (1987). Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint and Hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122–128.
80.
KeeneS.DaveyB. (1987). Effects of computer-presented text on LD adolescents' reading behaviors. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 283–290.
81.
KellyB.CarnineD. W.GerstenR.GrossenB. (1986). The effectiveness of videodisc instruction in teaching fractions to learning handicapped and remedial high school students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8 (2), 5–17.
82.
KinzieM. B.SullivanH. J.BerdelR. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 299–303.
83.
KosmoskiP. K. (1984). Educational computing: The burden of insuring quality. Phi Delta Kappan, 5, 244–248.
84.
KozmaR. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.
85.
KulikC. C.KulikJ. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75–94.
86.
KulikJ. A.BangertR. L.WilliamsG. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 19–26.
87.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C.Bangert-DrownsR. L. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 59–74.
88.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 293–323.
89.
LahmE. A. (1992, June). Issues and trends for special education technology in the 21st century: First year findings. Paper presented at the RESNA International Conference. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
90.
LepperM. R.MaloneT. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In SnowR. E.FarrM. J., Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Vol 3: Conative and affective process analyses (pp 255–286). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
91.
LevinJ. A. (1982). Microcomputer communication networks for education. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4 (2), 1–3.
LieberJ.CosdenM. (1989). Computer laboratory specialists in elementary schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 1 (1), 3–13.
94.
LieberJ.SemmelM. I. (1989). The relationship of group configuration to the interactions of students using microcomputers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10 (1), 14–23.
95.
LinA.PodellD. M.ReinN. (1991). The effects of CAI on word recognition in mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11, 16–25.
96.
LockheedM. E.MandinachE. B. (1986). Trends in educational computing: Decreasing interest and the changing focus of instruction. Educational Researcher, 15 (5), 21–26.
97.
LongstreetW. S.SorantP. E. (1985). Computer literacy—Definition?Educational Horizons, 15 (5), 117–120.
98.
MacArthurC. A. (1988). The impact of computers on the writing process. Exceptional Children, 54, 536–542.
99.
MacArthurC. A.HaynesJ. A.MaloufD. B. (1986). Learning disabled students' engaged time and classroom interactions: The impact of computer assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 189–198.
100.
MacArthurC. A.MaloufD. B. (1991). Teachers' beliefs, plans, and decisions about computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education, 25, 44–72.
101.
MacDonaldN. H.FraseL. T.GingrichP. S.KeenanS. A. (1982). The Writer's Workbench: Computer aids for text analysis. IEEE Transactions on Communication, 20, 1–14.
102.
MacGregorS. K. (1988). Use of self-questioning with a computer-mediated text system and measures of reading performance. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 131–148.
103.
MadduxC. D. (1988). Research and the state of the art in educational computing. Computers in the Schools, 5 (3/4), 1–10.
104.
MadduxC. D.JohnsonD. L.WillisJ. W. (1992). Educational computing; Learning with tomorrow's technologies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
105.
MajsterekD.WilsonR. (1989). Computer-assisted instruction for students with learning disabilities: Considerations for practitioners. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5, 18–27.
106.
MaleM. (1988). Special magic: Computers, classroom strategies and exceptional students. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
107.
MaloufD. B. (1987–88). The effect of instructional computer games on continuing student motivation. Journal of Special Education, 21 (4), 27–38.
108.
Market Data Retrieval, & Link Resources Corporation, (1991). Education & Technology, Shelton, CT: Author.
109.
McDermottP. A.WatkinsM. W. (1983). Computerized vs. conventional remedial instruction for learning-disabled pupils. Journal of Special Education, 17, 81–88.
110.
McGintyT. (1987). Electronic Learning's Second Annual Computer Coordinator Survey: Growing pains: A portrait of an emerging profession. Electronic Learning, 6 (5), 18–23.
111.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L. (1988). Learning vocabulary: Different ways for different goals. Remedial Education and Special Education, 9, 42–52.
112.
McNeilB. J.NelsonK. R. (1991). Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: A 10 year review of achievement effects. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 1–6.
113.
MerrillP. F.HammonsK.TolmanM. N.ChristensenL.VincentB. R.ReynoldsP. L. (1992). Computers in education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
114.
MerrillP. F.SalisburyD. (1984). Research on drill and practice strategies. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 11, 19–21.
115.
MevarechZ. R. (1985). Computer-assisted instructional methods: A factorial study within mathematics disadvantaged classrooms. Journal of Experimental Education, 54 (1), 22–27.
116.
MevarechZ. R.SternD.LevitaI. (1987). To cooperate or not to cooperate in CAI: That is the question. Journal of Educational Research, 80 (3), 164–167.
117.
MinskyM. (1970). Form and content in computer science. Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery, 17, 197–215.
118.
MolnarA. R. (1978). The next great crisis in American education: Computer literacy. AEDS Journal, 12, 11–20.
119.
MooreP. R. (1990). Integrating microcomputers into special education classrooms: Analyses of changes in teacher and student behaviors and the classroom instructional program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
120.
MorrisP. D.MurdockJ. Y.O'ConnerN. M.St. PeterS. M. (1987, October). Comparing teacher-assisted and computer-assisted instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Learning Disabilities, San Diego, CA.
121.
MoskowitzJ. H.BirmanB. F. (1985). Computers in the schools: Implications of change. Educational Technology, 25 (1), 7–14.
122.
NaronN. K.EstesN. (1985, April). Technology in the schools: Trends and policies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
123.
NeumanD. (1991). Learning disabled students' interactions with commercial courseware: A naturalistic study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39 (1), 31–49.
124.
NeumanS. B.Cobb-MoroccoC. (1987–88). Writing with word processors for remedial students. The Computing Teacher, 15 (4), 45–47, 61.
125.
NevisonJ. M. (1976). Computing in the liberal arts college. Science, 194, 396–402.
126.
Office of Technology Assessment (1988, September). Power On! New Tools for Teaching and learning. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
127.
OkoloC. M. (1992a). The effect of computer-assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the arithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 3, 195–211.
128.
OkoloC. M. (1992b). The effects of computer-based attribution retraining on the attributions persistence, and mathematics computation of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25 (5), 327–334.
129.
OkoloC. M.RiethH. J.BahrC. (1989). Microcomputer implementation in secondary special education programs: A study of special educators', mildly handicapped adolescents', and administrators' perspectives. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 107–117.
130.
PalinscarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
131.
PalumboD. B. (1990). Programming language/problem-solving research: A review of relevant issues. Review of Educational Research, 60, 65–89.
132.
PalumboD. B.ReedW. M. (1991). The effects of BASIC programming language instruction on high school students' problem solving ability and computer anxiety. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 343–372.
133.
PapertS. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Viking Press.
PeaR. D. (1984). Symbol systems and thinking skills: Logo in context. Preproceedings of the 1984 International Logo Conference. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
136.
PeaR. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychology, 20, 167–182.
137.
PeaR. D. (1987). The aims of software criticism: Reply to Professor PapertEducational Researcher, 16 (5), 4–8.
138.
PellegrinoJ. W.GoldmanS. R. (1987). Information processing and elementary mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 23–32, 57.
139.
PerkinsD. N. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14 (7), 11–17.
140.
PerkinsD. N.SalomonG. (1987). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–142.
141.
PollockJ. C.SullivanH. J. (1990). Practice mode and learner control in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 251–260.
142.
PillerC. (1992). Separate realities. Macworld, 9 (9), 218–231.
143.
PressleyM.WoodE.WoloshynV. E.MartinV.KingA.MenkeD. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27 (1), 91–109.
144.
ReinkingD. (1983). The effects of computer-mediated test and reader study behavior on measures of reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
145.
ReinkingD. (1988). Computer-mediated text and comprehension differences: The role of reading time, reader reference, and estimation of learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 484–498.
146.
ReinkingD.RickmanS. S. (1990). The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 395–411.
147.
ReinkingD.SchreinerR. (1985). The effects of computer-mediated text on measures of reading comprehension and reading behavior. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 536–552.
148.
RieberL. P. (1990). Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38 (1), 77–56.
149.
RielM. (1983). Education and ecstasy: Computer chronicles of students writing together. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3, 59–67.
150.
RiethH.BahrC.OkoloC.PolsgroveL.EckertR. (1988). An analysis of the impact of microcomputers on the secondary special education classroom ecology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4 (4), 425–441.
151.
RiethH.BahrC.PolsgroveL.OkoloC.EckertR. (1987). The effects of microcomputers on the secondary special education classroom ecology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8 (4), 36–45.
152.
RiethH. J.PolsgroveL.SemmelM. (1981). A review of research on the relationship of instructional time and achievement: Implications for research and practice. Education Unlimited, 2 (6), 53–57.
153.
RobertsonE. B.LadewigB. H.StricklandM. P.BoschungM. D. (1987). Enhancement of self-esteem through the use of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 80 (5), 314–316.
154.
RoblyerM.CastineW.KingF. (1988). The effectiveness of computer applications for instruction. New York: Haworth Press.
155.
RosegrantT. (1985). Using the microcomputer as a tool for learning to read and write. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 113–115.
156.
RothS. F.BeckI. L. (1987). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 197–218.
157.
RouseM. D.EvansP. L. C. (1985). Drill and practice computer programs improve performance in arithmetic-or do they?Remedial Education, 20, 59–63.
158.
RussellS. J. (1986). But what are they learning? The dilemma of using microcomputers in special education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 100–104.
159.
RussellS. J.CorwinR.MokrosJ. R.KapisovskyP. M. (1989). Beyond drill and practice: Expanding the computer mainstream. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
160.
SalesG. C.BehongT.MacLeodR. (1991). The evolution of K-12 instructional software; An analysis of leading microcomputer-based programs from 1981–1988. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 41–47.
161.
SalisburyD. G. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications for designing drill and practice activities for the computer. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 22–30.
162.
SalomonG. (1988). AI in reverse: Computer tools that turn cognitive. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 123–139.
163.
SalomonG. (1992, April). Computer's first decade: Golem, Camelot, or the Promised Land?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
164.
SalomonG.PerkinsD. N.GlobersonT. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20 (3), 2–9.
165.
SandholtzJ. H.RingstaffC.DwyerD. C. (April, 1990). Teaching in high-tech environments: Classroom management revisited. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
166.
SandalsL. H.HughesJ. (1988). Computer software for those with special needs: What is really needed?Canadian Journal of Special Education, 4, 23–41.
167.
ScanduraJ. (1964). An analysis of exposition and discovery modes of problem solving instruction. Journal of Experimental Education, 33, 149–159.
168.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC.SteinbachR. (1984). The teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8, 173–190.
SchiffmanG.TobinD.BuchannanB. (1982). Microcomputer instruction for the learning disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 557–559.
171.
SchmidtM.WeinsteinT.NiemicR.WalbergH. J. (1985–86). Computer-assisted instruction with exceptional children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 493–501.
172.
ScottT.ColeM.EngelM. (1992). Computers and education: A cultural constructivist perspective. In GrantG. (Ed.), Review of research in education. Vol 18 (pp. 191–251). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
173.
SemmelM. I.LieberJ. A. (1986). Computer applications in instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 18 (9), 1–12.
174.
SeymourS. L.StoryN. O.MosleyM. L. (1986). Microcomputers and continuing motivation. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, in Las Vegas, Nevada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED267791)
175.
SheingoldK.HadleyM. (1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College of Education, Center for Technology in Education.
176.
SheingoldK.MartinL. W. M.EndreweitM. E. (1985). Preparing urban teachers for the technological future (Technical Report No. 36). New York: Bank Street College of Education, Center for Children and Technology.
177.
ShlechterT. M. (1991). Problems and promises of computer-based training. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
178.
SimonH. A. (1978). Information-processing theory of human problem solving. In EstesW. K. (Ed.) Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processing (pp. 271–295). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
179.
Smith-BurkeM. T.DeeganD.JaggarA. M. (1991). Whole language: A viable alternative for special and remedial education?Topics in Language Disorders, 11 (3), 58–68.
180.
SnyderT.PalmerJ. (1986). In search of the most amazing thing: Children, education, and computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
181.
SwanK.MitraniJ.GuerreroF.CheungM.SchoenerJ. (1990). Honing in on the target: Who among the educationally disadvantaged benefits most from what CBI?Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22 (4), 381–403.
182.
ThomasC. C.EnglertC. S.GreggS. L. (1987). An analysis of the errors and strategies in the expository writing of learning disabled students. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 21–30.
183.
ThomasL.KnezekD. (1991). Providing technology leadership for restructured schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 265–279.
184.
ThomasR.HooperE. (1991). Simulations: An opportunity we are missing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 497–513.
185.
TochT. (1991). Wired for learning. U.S. News and World Report, 111 (18), 76–80.
186.
TolmanM. N.AllredR. A. (1991). The computer and education. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
187.
TorgesenJ. K. (1984). Instruction uses of microcomputers with elementary aged mildly handicapped children. Special Services in the Schools, 1 (1), 37–48.
188.
TorgesenJ. K. (1986). Computer-assisted instruction with learning disabled children. In TorgesenJ. K.WongB. Y. L. (Eds.). Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 417–435). New York: Academic Press.
189.
TorgesenJ. K.WatersM. D.CohenA. L.TorgesenJ. L. (1988). Improving sight recognition skills in LD children: An evaluation of three computer program variations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 125–132.
190.
TrifilettiJ. J.FrithG. H.ArmstrongS. (1984). Microcomputers versus resource rooms for LD students: A preliminary investigation of the effects on math skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 69–76.
191.
TurkelS. B.PodellD. M. (1984). Computer-assisted learning for mildly handicapped students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16 (4), 258–262.
192.
VargasJ. S. (1986). Instructional design flaws in computer-assisted instruction. Phi Data Kappan, 67, 738–744.
193.
VenselG. J. (1981). Changes in attitudes of preservice special educators toward computers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 4 (3), 40–43.
194.
WalkerD. F. (1987). Logo needs research: A response to Papert's paper. Educational Researcher, 16 (5), 9–11.
195.
WeirA., (1982). Logo: A learning environment for the severely handicapped. Journal of Special Education Technology, 5 (1), 20–22.
196.
WhiteC. S. (1987). Developing information-processing skills through structured activities with a computerized file-management program. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 355–375.
197.
WiebeJ. H.MartinN. J. (1990, April). The impact of a computer-based adventure/action game on achievement and attitudes in geography. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
198.
WinklerJ.ShavelsonR.StaszC.RobynA.FeibelW. (1984, April). How effective teachers use microcomputers for instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
199.
WiseB. W.OlsonR. C. (in press). Computer speech and the remediation of reading and spelling problems: An overview of the Colorado Remediation Component of the Colorado Reading Study. Journal of Special Education Technology.
200.
WiskeM. S.ZodhiatesP.WilsonB.GordonM.HarveyW.KrenskyL.LordB.WattM.WilliamsK. (1988, March). How technology affects teaching (Technical Report TR87–10). Cambridge, MA: Educational Technology Center, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
201.
WoodruffE.BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (1981–82). On the road to computer compositions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 10 (2), 133–149.
202.
WoodwardJ. P.CarnineD. W. (1988). Antecedent knowledge and intelligent computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 131–139.
203.
WoodwardJ. P.CarnineD. W. (1989). The Genisys Program: Linking content area knowledge to problem solving through technology-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 99–112.
204.
WoodwardJ.CarnineD.GerstenR. (1988). Teaching problem solving through computer simulations. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 72–86.
205.
WoodwardJ.CarnineD.GerstenR.GleasonM.JohnsonG.CollinsM. (1986). Applying instructional design principles to CAI for mildly handicapped students: Four recently conducted studies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8, 13–26.
206.
ZellermayerM.SalomonG.GlobersonT.GivonH. (1991). Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 373–391.
207.
ZorfassJ. M. (1992). Promoting successful technology integration through active teaching processes. Teaching and teaming, 6 (3), 46–59.
208.
ZorfassJ.PerskyS.RernzA. R. (1990. April). Promoting successful technology integration: Contributions of technology specialists. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.