This study examined the effect of an introductory computer course on special education students' attitudes toward computers in education and their self-perceived confidence and competence to use computers. The impact of course information and exposure to principles of effective instruction upon students' evaluations of computer-assisted instructional software also was assessed. General attitudes toward computers, which were highly positive at the start of the study, were not significantly affected by the course, nor did course experiences have a systematic effect on participants' ratings of instructional software programs. However, the course appeared to significantly enhance participants' self-perceived competence in using computers. Implications of these findings for preparing special educators to effectively use computer-based instruction are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonR.E.HansenT.P.JohnsonD.C.KlassenD.L. (1979). Instructional computing: Acceptance and rejection by secondary school teachers. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 6, 227–250.
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
3.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
4.
BeckI.L.McKeownM.G.RothS.F. (1987). Word Wise I, II, and III: Better comprehension through vocabulary [computer program]. Allen, TX: DLM.
5.
BeckI.L.RothS.F. (1984). Hint and Hunt I and II [computer program]. Allen, TX: DLM.
6.
BergerC.F.CarlsonE.A. (1988). Measuring computer literacy of teacher trainers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 287–301.
7.
BlackhurstA.E. (1977). Competency-based special education personnel preparation. In KneedlerR.D.TarverS.G. (Eds.), Changing perspectives in special education (pp. 156–182). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
8.
BlackhurstA.E.MacArthurC.A. (1986). Microcomputer use in special education personnel preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 27–36.
9.
BlackhurstA.E.MacArthurC.A.ByromE.M. (1988). Microcomputing competencies for special education professors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 153–160.
10.
BlumB.L. (1982, April). Evaluation of educational software for microcomputers: An analytical approach. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
11.
BrophyJ. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069–1077.
12.
BulloughR.V.BeattyL.P. (1987). Classroom applications of microcomputers. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
13.
CosdenM.A.GerberM.M.SemmelD.S.GoldmanS.R.SemmelM.I. (1985, January). Observational study of microcomputer use by special day class, resource room, and mainstream handicapped and nonhandicapped students. (Res. Rep. No. 8.0). University of California, Santa Barbara, Project TEECh.
14.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1987, July). Roundtable in special education technology in the higher education curriculum. Reston, VA: Author.
15.
EdyburnD.L. (1982). The effects of two levels of microcomputer graphics on reading comprehension. Master's thesis, Illinois State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 218 593)
16.
EPIE (1986–87). The Educational Software Selector (TESS) (3rd edition). Water Mill, NY: Author.
17.
EPIE (1988). The Educational Software Selector (TESS): The 1988 Supplement. Water Mill, NY: Author.
18.
FisherC.W.BerlinerD.C.FilbyN.N.MarliaveR.CahenL.S.DishawM.M.MooreJ.E. (1978). Teaching and learning in the elementary school: A summary of the beginning teacher evaluation study. San Francisco: Far West Labs.
19.
GovierH. (1988). Microcomputers in primary education—A survey of recent research. (Occasional Paper ITE/28a/88). University of Lancaster, England: Economic and Social Research Council.
20.
HankyT.V.ClarkL.S.WhiteL.J. (1984, April). Microcomputers in special education: Findings and recommendations from case studies. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Council for Exceptional Children, Washington, DC.
21.
HasselbringT.S. (1987, May). Effective microcomputer training and implementation. Paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the Special Education Software Center, Arlington, VA.
22.
HasselbringT.S.GoinL.I. (1988). DLM math fluency program [computer program]. Allen, TX: DLM.
23.
JohnsonM.K.DusseldorpR.V. (1984). Software evaluation procedure incorporating individual learner information. In MartinC.D.HellerR.S. (Eds.), Capitol-izing on computers in education: Proceedings of the 1984 Association of Educational Data Systems Annual Convention (pp. 132–140). Rockville, MD: Computer Science Press.
24.
KinneyR.G.BlackhurstA.E. (1987). Technology competencies for teachers of young children with severe handicaps. Topics in Early Childhood Education, 7(3), 105–115.
25.
LewisR.B.DellS.J.LynchE.W.HarrisonP.J.SabaF. (1987, July). Special education technology in action: Teachers speak out. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University, Department of Special Education.
26.
LindseyJ.D. (1987). Computers and exceptional individuals. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
27.
MadsenJ.M.SebastianiL.A. (1987). The effect of computer literacy instruction on teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward microcomputers. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(2), 68–72
28.
MaloufD.B.MorariuJ.CoulsonD.B.MaidenV.S. (1989). Special education teachers' preferences for sources of software information. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 144–155.
29.
MorariuJ.CoulsonD.MaloufD.MacArthurC. (1985). Development and initial testing of a software evaluation instrument for use in research on microcomputers in special education. (Tech. Rep. 102). College Park: University of Maryland, Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth.
30.
Office of Technology Assessment (1988): Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
31.
OkoloC.RiethH.J.BahrC. (1989). Microcomputer use in secondary special education: Special education teachers' administrators', and students' perspectives. Journal of Special Education, 23, 230–236.
32.
OwstonR.D.Dudley-MarlingC. (1988). A criterion-based approach to software evaluation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 20, 234–244.
33.
ReidR.C.AllardK.E.HofmeisterA.M. (1987). The SECTOR Courseware Evaluation From. In LindseyJ.D. (Ed.), Computers and exceptional individuals (pp. 357–366). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
34.
RiethH.J.BahrC.OkoloC. (1989). MICROS Final Report. Nashville: Vanderbilt University, Peabody College.
35.
RiethH.J.PolsgroveL.SemmelM.I. (1979). Relationship between instructional time and academic achievement: Implications for practice. Education Unlimited, 1(6), 53–56.
36.
RosenshineB.StevensR. (1986). Teaching functions. In WittrockM.C. (Ed), Handbook of research of teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.
37.
ShuellT.J.SchuecklerL.M. (1988, April). Toward evaluating software according to principles of teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
38.
WiskeM.S.ZodhiatesP.WilsonB.GordonM.HarveyW.KrenskyL.LordB.WattM.WilliamsK. (1988). How technology affects teaching. (Tech. Rep. TR87-10). Cambridge: Harvard Graduate School of Education, Educational Technology Center.
