CLASS.LD2, a computer-based expert system designed to provide second-opinion advice on the appropriateness of a learning disabilities classification, was combined with strategies of effective concept instruction to create an instructional package entitled LD.Trainer. LD.Trainer was used to train preservice and inservice regular and special educators to more accurately identify students qualifying for special education under the classification of learning disabilities. The effectiveness of LD.Trainer was compared with exposure to the original CLASS.LD2 system. Ninety-seven volunteer university students were randomly assigned to the LD.Trainer or CLASS.LD2 treatment groups. Subjects who completed the LD.Trainer materials scored statistically and educationally higher on the posttest than those who used the original CLASS.LD2 system. Recommendations for future study and incorporation of effective concept instruction strategies in preparation of special educators are addressed.
BaerR.FerraraJ.M.AlthouseB.ReavisK. (1988). CLASS.BD: An expert system for classifying behauiorally disordered students [Computer program]. Logan: Utah State University, Developmental Center for Handicapped Persons.
EngelmannS.CarnineD. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.
9.
FeldmanK.V.KlausmeterH.J. (1974). Effects of two kinds of definitions cm the concept attainment of fourth and eighth graders. Journal of Educational Research, 67, 219–223.
10.
FerraraJ.M.HofmeisterA.M. (1986). CLASS.LD2: An expert system for classifying teaming disabled students [Computer program]. Logan: Utah State University Developmental Center for Handicapped Persons.
11.
FerraraJ.M.PraterM.A.BaerR. (1987). Using an expert system for complex conceptual training. Educational Technology, 27(5), 43–46.
12.
FerraraJ.M.WilliamsD.GiereS. (1987). CLASS.IH: An expert system for classifying intellectually handicapped students [Computer program]. Logan: Utah State University, Developmental Center for Handicapped Persons.
13.
GagneR.M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed). New York: CBS College Publishing.
14.
HarmonP.KingD. (1985). Expert systems: Artificial intelligence in business. New York: John Wiley
15.
HarrisR.C. (1973). Concept learning as a function of type, identifiability, and variety of instructional instances. The Journal of Educational Research, 67, 182–189.
16.
HofmeisterA.M. (1977). Educating the mildly handicapped. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Special Education, Utah State University, Logan.
17.
HofmeisterA.M.FerraraJ.M. (1986). Expert systems and special education. Exceptional Children, 53, 235–239.
18.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects, and materials. New Vink: McGraw-Hill.
19.
KlausmeierH.J. (1980). Learning and teaching concepts: A strategy for testing applications of theory. New York: Academic Press.
PetersonA.GoldS. (1988). CLASS.PH: An expert system for the classifying of physically handicapped students [Computer program], Logan: Utah State University, Developmental Center for Handicapped Persons.
26.
PraterM.A.AlthouseB.FerraraJ.M.HofmeisterA.M. (1986). LD.Trainer [Computer program and accompanying printed material). Logan, UT: Utah State University, Developmental Center for Handicapped Persons.
27.
PraterM.A.BarraraJ.M. (1986, May). Training applications of expert systems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee
28.
ShaverJ.P. (1985, October). Chance and nonsense: A conversation about interpreting tests of statistical significance, Part 2. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 138–141.
29.
ShortliffeE.H. (1976). Computer-based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. New York: American Elsevier.
30.
ShumwayR.J.WhiteA.L.WilsonP.BrombacherB. (1983). Fature frequency and negative instances in concept learningAmerican Educational Research Journal, 20, 451–459.
31.
StefikM.AikinsJ.BalzerR.BenoitJ.BimbaumL.Hayes-RothR.SacerdotiE. (1983). The architecture of expert systems. In Hayes-RothF.WatermanD.A.LenatD.B. (Eds.), Building expert systems (pp. 89–126). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
TennysonR.D.CocchiarellaM.J. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts. Review of Educational Research, 56, 40–71.
33.
TennysonR.D.ParkO. (1980). The teaching of concepts: A review of instructional desigi research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50, 55–70.
34.
TennysonR.D.WoolleyF.R.MerrillM.D. (1972). Examplar and nonexamplar variables which produce correct concept classification behavior and specified classification errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 144–152
35.
WengerE. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
36.
WilliamsP.B.Carnine;D.W. (1981). Relationship between range of examples and of instructions and attention in concept attainmentJournal of Educational Research, 74, 144–148.
37.
YsseldykeJ.E. (1983). Current practices in making psychoeducational decisions about learning disabled students. Annual Review of Learning Disabilities, 1, 31–38.
