This paper presents a framework for studying the use of computers in special education. The framework consists of two dimensions, one describing the service delivery areas that compose special education and the other, general questions that might be posed about any educational innovation. Such a framework might be used by researchers as a guide to identifying the advantages and limitations of new technology for educating disabled students. Examples of the framework's application are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BehrmanM. (1984). Handbook of microcomputers in special education. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
BennettR. E. (1981). Professional competence and the assessment of exceptional children. Journal of Special. Education, 15, 437–446.
4.
BennettR. E. (1982). Applications of microcomputer technology to special education. Exceptional Children, 49(2), 106–113.
5.
BennettR. E. (1983). Project SPECIAL: System evaluation report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 240 123.
6.
BennettR. E. (1984). Myths and realities in automating special education information management. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 52–54.
7.
BennettR. E. (In press). Planning and evaluating computer education programs. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
8.
BennettR. E.MaherC. A. (1984). Microcomputers and exceptional children. New York: Haworth Press.
9.
BlackhurstA. E. (1983). Using microcomputers to manage student records. Teacher Education and Special Education, 6, 163–172.
10.
BlackhurstA. E.MacArthurC. A. (1985). Microcomputer use in special education personnel preparation programs. Vienna, VA: The Dissemin/Action Products Center.
11.
BlaschkeC. L. (1985). Technology trends in special education. THE Journal, 12(6), 73–77.
12.
BrinkerR. P.LewisM. (1982). Making the world work with microcomputers: A learning prosthesis for handicapped infants. Exceptional Children, 49, 163–170.
13.
BrownN. P. (1982). CAMEO: Computer-assisted management of educational objectives. Exceptional Children, 49, 151–153.
14.
BudhoffM.ThormannJ.GrasA. (1986). Microcomputers in special education. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
15.
DanleyW. E.Jr.JohnsonL. (1984). A computer-based method of teaching students to administer individual intelligence tests. THE Journal, 12(3), 98–99.
16.
DegnanS. C.HummelJ. W. (1985). Word processing for special education students: Worth the effort. THE Journal, 12(6), 80–82.
17.
Education Turnkey Systems, Inc. (Undated). Computer assisted instruction (CAI): The bottom line. Fairfax, VA: The International Communications Industries Association.
18.
FitzgeraldG. (1986). Implementation in field test sites. In Classroom behavior record: Observer's manual. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
GeoffrionL. D.GoldenbergE. P. (1981). Computer-based exploratory learning systems for communication-handicapped children. Journal of Special Education, 15, 325–332.
21.
GoldenbergE. P.RussellS. J.CarterC. J.StokesS.SylvesterM. J.KelmanP. (1984). Computers, education and special needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
HagenD. (1984). Microcomputer resource book for special education. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company.
23.
HasselbringT. S. (1986). Toward the development of expert assessment systems. Special Services in the Schools, 2(2/3) 43–56.
24.
HasselbringT. S.OwensS. (1983). Microcomputer-based analysis of spelling errors. Computers, Reading and Language Arts, 1, 26–31.
25.
HaydenD.VanceB.IrvinM. S. (1982). A special education management system. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 374–375.
26.
HummelJ. W. (1985). Word processing and word processing related software for the learning disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 559–562.
27.
KulikJ. A.BangertR. L.WilliamsG. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 19–26.
28.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C.CohenP. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50, 525–544.
29.
MacArthurC. A.HaynesJ. A.MaloufD. B. (1986). Learning disabled students' engaged time and classroom interaction: The impact of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(2), 189–198.
30.
MadduxC. D.JohnsonD. L. (1983). LOGO for the learning disabled. Closing the Gap. 2(1), 2, 16.
31.
MaherC. A.BennettR. E. (1984). Planning and evaluating special education services. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
MooreG. B.YinR. K.LahmE. A. (1986). Robotics, artificial intelligence, computer simulation: Future applications in special education. THE Journal, 14(1), 74–76.
33.
MoroccoC. C.NeumanS. B. (1986). Word Processors and the acquisition of writing strategies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 243–247.
34.
MurphyR. T.AppelL. R. (1984). Evaluation of the Writing to Read instructional system. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
35.
PetrofskyJ. S. (1983). Computer control of walking in paraplegic subjects. IEEE NAECON Record, 83, 1162–1171.
36.
RagostaM. (1983). Computer-assisted instruction and compensatory education: A longitudinal analysis. Machine Mediated Learning. 1, 97–126.
37.
SchmidtM.WeinsteinT.NiemicR.WahlbergH. J. (1985–86). Computer-assisted instruction with exceptional children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 493–501.
38.
Success for the “bionic ear.” (1984, March). TIME. p. 60. TALMIS, Inc. (1985). The k-12 market for microcomputers and software. New York: Author.
39.
TubbG. W. (1981). Bus route planning package for the handicapped. In IEEE Computer Society (Ed.), Proceedings of the Johns Hopkins First National Search for Applications of Personal Computing to Aid the Handicapped. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
40.
WardW. C. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 3, 16–20.
41.
WilsonM. S.FoxB. J. (1982). Computer-administered bilingual language assessment and intervention. Exceptional Children, 49, 145–149.
