This study demonstrated the effectiveness of group reinforcement procedures in managing the disruptive behavior of handicapped and nonhandicapped students in a regular third grade classroom. The procedures were also socially validated by the students and classroom teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ZeliD. C.An analogous study of children's attitudes toward school in an open classroom environment as opposed to a conventional setting. 1975. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 110 073).
2.
GauvainM. T.RoperS. S.NolanR. R.Students' perceptions of behavior and instructional practices in open-space schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York. April 4–8, 1977. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 143, 939).
3.
CheekR. E.The opinions of teachers teaching in selected open space elementary schools (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1970). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1970 (University Microfilms No. 71–77, 247).
4.
PritchardD. L.MoodieA. G.A survey of teachers' opinions regarding open-areas. June. 1971. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 057 102).
5.
GrapkoM. F.A comparison of open-space and traditional classroom structures according to independence measures in children, teacher's awareness of children's personality variables and children's academic progress. Final report, April 30, 1972. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 088, 180).
6.
BaerD. M.WolfM. M.RisleyT. R.Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 91–97.
7.
BarrishH. H.SaundersM.WolfM. M.Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 119–124.
8.
CobbJ. A.HopsH.Effects of academic survival skill training on low achieving first graders. Journal of Educational Research, 1973, 67, 108–113.
9.
GreenwoodC. R.DelquadriJ.HopsH.WalkerH. M.Program for academic survival skills (PASS): Manual for teachers. Eugene: Center at Oregon for Research in the Behavioral Education of the Handicapped. University of Oregon.1977.
10.
GreenwoodC. R.HopsDelquadriJ.GuildJ.Group contingencies for group consequences in classroom management: A further analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1974, 7, 413–425.
11.
GreenwoodC. R.HopsH.DelquadriJ.WalkerH. M.Program for academic survival skills (PASS): Manual for consultants. Eugene: Center at Oregon for Research in the behavioral Education of the Handicapped. University of Oregon, 1977.
12.
GreenwoodC. R.HopsH.WalkerH. M.The program for academic survival skills (PASS): Effects on student behavior and achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 1977, 15, 25–35.
13.
GreenwoodC. R.HopsH.WalkerH. M.GuildJ. J.StokesJ.YoungK. R.KelemanK. S.WillardsonM.Standardized classroom management program: Social validation and replication studies in Utah and Oregon. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1979, 12, 235–253.
14.
HermanS. H.TramontanaJ.Instructions and group versus individual reinforcement in modifying group descriptive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1971, 4, 113–120.
15.
LitowL.PumroyD. K.A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975, 8, 341–347.
16.
LongJ. D.WilliamsR. L.The common practice effectiveness of group and individually contingent free time with inner city junior high school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1973, 6, 465–474.
17.
O'LearyK. D.BeckerW. C.Behavior modification of an adjustment class: A token reinforcement program. Exceptional Children. 1967, 33, 637–642.
18.
PackardR. G.The control of “classroom attention”: A group contingency for complex behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1970, 3, 13–28.
19.
SchmidtG.UlrichR. E.Effects of group contingent events upon classroom noise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 171–179.
20.
StokesT. F.BaerD. M.An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1977, 10, 340–367.
21.
ThomasJ. E.Pod units in an open elementary school. School and Community. April 1971, 57, 12–13.
22.
U-Sail Program.Utah Systems Approach to Individualized Learning, 1975. P.O. Box 9327, Salt Lake City, Utah.
23.
Utah State Board of Education.Rules and Regulations for the Handicapped. 1978. Salt Lake City. Utah.
24.
WillisJ.CrowderJ.A portable devise for group modification of classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1972, 5, 199–202.
25.
WilsonC. W.HopkinsB. L.The effects of contingent music on the intensity of noise in junior high home economics classes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1973, 6, 269–276.
26.
WolfM. M.Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1978, 11, 203–214.
