AshcroftS.C.Research and evaluation: New directions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1979, 2(4), 1–5.
2.
BatesP.RenzagliaA.WehmanP.Characteristics of an appropriate education for severely and profoundly handicapped students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1981, 16, 142–149.
3.
BleilG.Evaluating educational materials. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975, 8, 19–26.
4.
BrownL.FalveyM.BaumgartD.PumpianL.SchroederJ.GruenewaldL.Strategies for teaching chronological age appropriate functional skills to adolescent and young adult severely handicapped students. (Vol. 9, P. 1). Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin and Madison Metropolitan School District, 1980.
5.
BrownL.NietupskiJ.LyonS.Hamre-NietupskiS.CrownerT.GrunewaldL.Curricular strategies for teaching functional object use, nonverbal communication, problem solving, and mealtime skills to severely handicapped students. (Vol. 7, P. 1) Madison, Wisconsin: Madison Metropolitan School District.1977.
6.
ElderJ.Technology of education for the severely handicapped: The future. Journal of Special Education Technology. 1978, 1(2), 32–34.
7.
FalveyM.BrownL.LyonS.BaumgartD.SchroederJ.Strategies for using cues and correction procedures. In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks, 1980.
8.
FinkleL.Teaching the severely/profoundly handicapped: The need for media in the institutions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1980, 2,(3). 40–47.
9.
Gaylord-RossR.A decision model for the treatment of aberrant behavior in applied settings. In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks, 1980.
10.
GuessD.NoonanM. J.Curricula and instructional procedures for severely handicapped students. Focus On Exceptional Children, 1982, 14, 5.
11.
HurleyK. M.HallensteinK.Teacher-made materials: A publisher's view. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1979, 2(4), 69–72.
12.
KleinN.PaschM.FrewT.Curriculum analysis and design for retarded learners. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill, 1979.
13.
LarsenL.Some problems facing producers and developers of media and materials for the severely handicapped. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1978, 1(2), 13–24.
14.
RagoW. V.ClelandC. C.Future directions in the education of the profoundly retarded. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1978, 13, 184–186.
15.
SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL.Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks, 1980.
16.
ShackelfordW.Synergy: May the “combined and correlated force” be with us. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1978, 1(2), 38–43.
17.
StowitschekJ.GableR.HendricksonJ.Instructional mate: als for exceptional children: Selection, management, and adaptation. Germantown, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation, 1980.
18.
ValeC.National needs assessment of educational media and materiais for the handicapped. Columbus: LINC Resources, Inc., 1980.
19.
WhiteO.Adaptive performance objectives form versus function In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks, 1980.
20.
WinschelJ.EnsherG.Educability revisited: Curricular implications for the mentally retarded. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1978, 13, 131–138.