Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
An Examination of Context-Aware Augmentative and Alternative Communication with Automated Response Options for Academic Communication From Autistic Children
Children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) often face barriers to full academic participation due to the difficulties of navigating traditional AAC displays. Advances in artificial intelligence may enable context-aware AAC tools that generate response options based on linguistic input from communication partners, enabling faster and more effective communication and potentially increasing academic participation. This study compared the effects of a context-aware AAC prototype to traditional AAC in supporting academic communication for three autistic preschool children (two male; one female) using an ABAB reversal design. Findings suggest that the context-aware AAC resulted in more frequent, accurate, and faster communication responses from all participants. Although this study used a prototype, results indicate that context-aware AAC technologies may enhance academic communication and participation for young autistic children. Further research is needed to explore the broader impact and long-term effectiveness of such tools in academic settings.
BerenguerC.MartinezE. R.De StasioS.BaixauliI. (2022). Parents’ perceptions and experiences with their children’s use of augmentative/alternative communication: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8091–8110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138091
2.
CaiS.VenugopalanS.SeaverK.XiaoX.TomanekK.JalasutramS.MorrisM. R.KaneS.NarayananA.MacDonaldR. L.KornmanE.VanceD.CaseyB.GleasonS. M.NelsonP. Q.BrennerM. P. (2023). Using large language models to accelerate communication for users with severe motor impairments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.01532. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.01532
3.
CaiS.VenugopalanS.TomanekK.NarayananA.MorrisM. R.BrennerM. P. (2022). Context-aware abbreviation expansion using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03767. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.03767
4.
CarnettA.NeelyL.ChenM. T.CantrellK.SantosE.Ala’i-RosalesS. (2022). How might indices of happiness inform early intervention research and decision making?Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 6(4), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-022-00288-0
5.
Da FonteM. A.BoeschM. C.DeLucaE. R.PappS. K.MohlerA. E.HolmesE. E.ClouseK. A.YoungR. D.UrbanoR. (2022). Current preparation status in AAC: Perspectives of special education teachers in the United States. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 38(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2022.2046851
6.
DorringtonP.WilkinsonC.TaskerL.WaltersA. (2016). User-centered design method for the design of assistive switch devices to improve user experience, accessibility, and independence. Journal of Usability Studies, 11(2), 66–82.
7.
GanzJ. B.PustejovskyJ. E.ReichleJ.VannestK. J.FosterM.PiersonL. M.WattanawongwanS.BernalA. J.ChenM.HaasA. N.LiaoC.-Y.SalleseM. R.SkovR.SmithS. D. (2023). Participant characteristics predicting communication outcomes in AAC implementation for individuals with ASD and IDD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 39(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2022.2116355
8.
GriffenB.CaldwellN.LorahE.HolyfieldC. (2025). Effects of AAC intervention on school readiness skills from young children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 77(4), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1159/000543628
9.
HolyfieldC.CaronJ.LightJ. (2019). Programming AAC just-in-time for beginning communicators: The process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2019.1686538
10.
HolyfieldC.LightJ.NiederD.PreeceJ. (2025). External challenges for individuals who need or use AAC who are learning language: Lived experiences, key research findings, and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 41(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2025.2508485
11.
HolyfieldC.MacNeilS.CaldwellN.O'Neill ZimmermanT.LorahE.DragutE.VuceticS. (2024). Leveraging communication partner speech to automate augmented input for children on the autism spectrum who are minimally verbal: Prototype development and preliminary efficacy investigation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 33(3), 1174–1192. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00224
12.
HolyfieldC.O’Neill ZimmermanT.MacNeilS.Sammarco CaldwellN.PatelP.GriffenB.LorahE.DragutE.VuceticS. (2025). Preliminary investigation of context-aware augmentative and alternative communication with automated just-in-time cloze phrase response options for social participation from children on the autism spectrum. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 77(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1159/000542304
13.
KäferJ.KugerS.KliemeE.KunterM. (2019). The significance of dealing with mistakes for student achievement and motivation: Results of doubly latent multilevel analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34, 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0408-7
14.
KaneS. K.Linam-ChurchB.AlthoffK.McCallD. (2012). What we talk about: Designing a context-aware communication tool for people with aphasia. In Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (pp. 49–56). https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384926
15.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
16.
LeathermanE. M.WegnerJ. R. (2022). Augmentative and alternative communication in the classroom: Teacher practices and experiences. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(3), 874–893. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00125
17.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2024). Single-case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003294726
18.
LightJ.FagerS. K.GormleyJ.HyattG. W.JakobsE. (2025). Dismantling societal barriers that limit people who need or use AAC: Lived experiences, key research findings, and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 41(3), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2025.2508490
19.
LorahE. R.MacNeilS.ZimmermanT.RackenspergerT.HolyfieldC.CaldwellN.DragutE. C.VuceticS. (2024). Spurring innovation in AAC technology through collaborative dreaming and needs finding with individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. Seminars in Speech and Language, 45(5), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791789
20.
MaulsbyD.GreenbergS.ManderR. (1993). Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz. In Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 277–284). https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169215
21.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35(4), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511399147
22.
QuinnE. D.AtkinsK.CookA. (2023). Exploring classroom factors and augmentative and alternative communication use in qualitative interviews. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(5), 2158–2177. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00041
23.
RaleyS. K.BurkeK. M.HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.KurthJ. A. (2020). The self-determined learning model of instruction and students with extensive support needs in inclusive settings. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-58.1.82
24.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.RifenbarkG. G.LaneK. L.PaceJ. R. (2021). The impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on student self-determination in inclusive, secondary classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 42(6), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520984842
25.
RaleyS. K.TownsendR. J.ShogrenK. A.MazzottiV. L.FredrickD.KwiatekS. M.ChapmanR. (2024). Examining student responses in technology-delivered self-determination intervention using the Goal-Setting Challenge App. The Journal of Special Education, 58(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669231179241
26.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K. (2022). Self-determination and causal agency theory: Integrating research into practice. Springer.
27.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733
28.
StadskleivK. (2017). Experiences from a support group for families of preschool children in the expressive AAC user group. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1276960
WilliamsK.HolyfieldC. (2025). Future of AAC technologies: Priorities for inclusive innovation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 41(3), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2025.2513906
31.
YorkeA. M.LightJ. C.Gosnell CaronJ.McNaughtonD. B.DragerK. D. (2018). The effects of explicit instruction in academic vocabulary during shared book reading on the receptive vocabulary of children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1506823
