The purpose of this study was to compare the differential effects of mobile assistive technology (AT) loaded with visual activity schedules (VAS; pictures alone) compared to video activity schedules (VidAS; pictures linked to video models) to promote vocational independence and decreased reliance on adult supports for adolescents and adults with intellectual disability, with and without autism. Seven single-case multitreatment designs were used to assess differential effects between the two interventions when participants completed various vocational tasks. All participants were able to perform some of the task steps independently with both VAS and VidAS but demonstrated a greater increase in independence with self-instruction using VidAS than when only given VAS. Results suggest that incorporating VidAS into mobile AT can increase independence while decreasing reliance on additional adult support, suggesting that this could be a reasonable accommodation in school, work, and community settings.
BartonE. E.PustejovskyJ. E.MagginD. M.ReichowB. (2017). Technology-aided instruction and intervention for students with ASD: A meta-analysis using novel methods of estimating effect sizes for single-case research. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517729508
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Persons with a disability: Labor force characteristics–2021. U.S. Department of Labor. (USDL Publication No. 22-0317). https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/disabl.pdf
6.
HumeK.SteinbrennerJ. R.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N.SavageM. N. (2021). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism: Third generation review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(11), 4013–4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04844-2
7.
JohnsonM.SpriggsA. D.ShepleyS. B.Allan AlldayR.SamudreM. (2019). Video activity schedules to increase independence for students with disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 31(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9631-z
8.
JuS.RobertsE.ZhangD. (2013). Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities: A review of research in the past decade. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 38(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.3233/jvr-130625
9.
KnightV.SartiniE.SpriggsA. D. (2015). Evaluating visual activity schedules as evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2201-z
10.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), (2024). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Routledge.
11.
OsosJ. A.PlavnickJ. B.AvendañoS. M. (2021). Assessing video enhanced activity schedules to teach social skills to children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(9), 3235–3244. https://10.1007/s10803-020-04784-x
12.
ParkJ.BouckE.DuenasA. (2019). The effect of video modeling and video prompting interventions on individuals with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418780464
13.
PraterM. A.CarterN.HitchcockC.DowrickP. (2012). Video self‐modeling to improve academic performance: A literature review. Psychology in the Schools, 49(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20617
14.
RideoutV.RobbM. B. (2019). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens, 2019. Common Sense Media.
15.
ShepleyS. B.SpriggsA. D.SamudreM.ElliotM. (2018). Increasing daily living independence using video activity schedules in middle school students with intellectual disability. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417732294
16.
ShepleyS. B.SpriggsA. D.SamudreM. D.SartiniE. C. (2019). Initiation and generalization of self-instructed video activity schedules for elementary students with intellectual disability. The Journal of Special Education, 53(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918800797
17.
SpriggsA. D.AyresK. A.TrumpC.TaylorC. (2017). Building programs focused on daily living and adult independence. In ChiangH. M. (Ed.), Autism and child psychopathology series: Curricula for teaching students with autism spectrum disorder (pp. 195–224). Springer.
18.
SpriggsA. D.KnightV. F.SherrowL. (2015). Talking picture schedules: Embedding video models into visual activity schedules to increase independence for students with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3846–3861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2315-3
19.
SpriggsA. D.MimsP. J.van DijkW.KnightV. F. (2017). Examination of the evidence Base for using visual activity schedules with students with intellectual disability. The Journal of Special Education, 51(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916658483
20.
SwanD. M.PustejovskyJ. E.BeretvasS. N. (2020). The impact of response-guided designs on count outcomes in single-case experimental design baselines. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 14(1–2), 82–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2020.1739048
WoleryM.AultM. L.DoyleP. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies: Longman.
23.
WolfeK.BartonE. E.MeadanH. (2019). Systematic protocols for the visual analysis of single-case research data. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(2), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00336-7
24.
WrightJ. C.KnightV. F.BartonE. E. (2020). A review of video modeling to teach STEM to students with autism and intellectual disability. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 70(2), 101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101476
