Tablet-mediated interventions have shown promise in improving the mathematical skills of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and/or intellectual disability (ID). This meta-analysis aims to provide a quantitative synthesis of single-case experimental studies of using tablet-mediated interventions to teach mathematics to individuals with ASD and/or ID. Twenty-seven published studies between 2012 and 2022 were included. The Tau-U effect size index was used to gauge the overall effect size of tablet-mediated interventions. The obtained effect size (Tau-U = 0.98, 95% CI 0.92–1.00) indicated large improvements in mathematics performance after using tablet-mediated interventions. The analysis of potential moderating variables, including participant characteristics, intervention components, and target mathematical skills found no statistically significant moderators. Implications for researchers and practitioners who use tablet-mediated interventions to teach mathematics to individuals with ASD and/or ID are also discussed.
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
2.
AlexanderJ. L.AyresK. M.SmithK. A.ShepleyS. B.MatarasT. K. (2013). Using video modeling on an iPad to teach generalized matching on a sorting mail task to adolescents with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(11), 1346–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.07.021
3.
AlnahdiG. H. (2015). Single-subject designs in special education: advantages and limitations.Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 15(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12039
4.
AspirantiK. B.LarwinK. H.SchadeB. P. (2020). iPads/tablets and students with autism: A meta-analysis of academic effects. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA, 32(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1463575
5.
*BassetteL.BouckE.ShurrJ.ParkJ.CremeansM. (2019). Comparison of concrete and app-based manipulatives to teach subtraction skills to elementary students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(4), 391–405.
6.
*BassetteL.BouckE.ShurrJ.ParkJ.CremeansM.RorkE.MillerK.GeiserS. (2020). A Comparison of Manipulative Use on Mathematics Efficiency in Elementary Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(4), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419854504.
7.
BelliniS.PetersJ. K.BennerL.HopfA. (2007). A meta-analysis of school-based social skills interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders.Remedial and Special Education, 28(3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280030401
8.
BlackwellC. K.LauricellaA. R.WartellaE. (2016). The influence of TPACK contextual factors on early childhood educators' tablet computer use. Computers & Education, 98(2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.010
9.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
*BouckE. C.BassetteL.ShurrJ.ParkJ.KerrJ.WhorleyA. (2017). Teaching equivalent fractions to secondary students with disabilities via the virtual–representational–abstract instructional sequence. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(4), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417727291.
12.
*BouckE. C.LongH.ParkJ. (2020a). Using a Virtual Number Line and Corrective Feedback to Teach Addition of Integers to Middle School Students with Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 33(9), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09735-z
13.
*BouckE. C.MaherC.ParkJ.WhorleyA. (2020b). Learning Fractions with a Virtual Manipulative Based Graduated Instructional Sequence. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 45–59.
14.
BouckE. C.ParkJ.StenzelK. (2020c). Virtual manipulatives as assistive technology to support students with disabilities with mathematics. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(4), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2020.1762157
15.
BouckE. C.ShurrJ.ParkJ. (2020d). Virtual manipulative-based intervention package to teach multiplication and division to secondary students with developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357620943499
16.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.LevyK.CwiakalaK.WhorleyA. (2020). App-based manipulatives and explicit instruction tosupport division with remainders. Exceptionality, 28 (1),45-59.
17.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.MaherC.LevyK.CwiakalaK. (2019a). Acquiring the skill of identifying fractions through the virtual-abstract framework.Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 31(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9650-9.
18.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.SatsangiR.CwiakalaK.LevyK. (2019b). Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to support acquisition of algebra. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(4), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419833022
19.
BouckE. C.ParkJ.ShurrJ.BassetteL.WhorleyA. (2018a). Using the virtual-representational-abstract approach to support students with intellectual disability in mathematics. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618755696
20.
BouckE. C.ParkJ.SprickJ.ShurrJ.BassetteL.WhorleyA. (2017). Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to teach addition of fractions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 70, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.09.002
21.
*BouckE. C.ShurrJ.BassetteL.ParkJ.WhorleyA. (2018b). Adding it up: Comparing concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with adding fractions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(3), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418759341
22.
BrankaerC.GhesquièreP.De SmedtB. (2011). Numerical magnitude processing in children with mild intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2853–2859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.020
23.
BrankaerC.GhesquièreP.De SmedtB. (2013). The development of numerical magnitude processing and its association with working memory in children with mild intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3361–3371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.001
24.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.HarrisA.WakemanxyaS. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400401
25.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.LoY.SaundersA. F.RootJ. R.Ley DavisL.BroshC. R. (2018). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability to solve word problems. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917721236
26.
BrunoA.Polo-BlancoI.González-LópezM. J.González-SánchezJ. (2021). Strategies for Solving Addition Problems Using Modified Schema-Based Instruction in Students with Intellectual Disabilities. Mathematics, 9(15), 1814. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151814
27.
*BurtonC. E.AndersonD. H.PraterM. A.DychesT. T. (2013). Video self-modeling on an iPad to teach functional mathematical skills to adolescents with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357613478829
28.
CelikS.VuranS. (2014). Comparison of direct instruction and simultaneous prompting procedure on teaching concepts to individuals with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(1), 127–144.
29.
ClarkA. M.SchmidtJ. D.MezhoudiN.KahngS. (2016). Using Percentile Schedules to Increase Academic Fluency. Behavioral Interventions, 31(3), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1445
30.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234, https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
31.
CoxS. K.RootJ. R. (2020). Modified schema-based instruction to develop flexible mathematics problem-solving strategies for students with autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518792660
32.
DowdyA.PeltierC.TincaniM.SchneiderW. J.HantulaD. A.TraversJ. C. (2021). Meta-analyses and effect sizes in applied behavior analysis: A review and discussion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(4), 1317–1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.862
33.
El ZeinF.GevarterC.BryantB.SonS. H.BryantD.KimM.SolisM. (2016). A comparison between iPad-assisted and teacher-directed reading instruction for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9458-9
34.
FerraroS. (2018). Is information and communication technology satisfying educational needs at school?Computers & Education, 122, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.002
35.
GhanouniP.JarusT.ZwickerJ. G.LucyshynJ. (2020). The use of technologies among individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Barriers and challenges.Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(4), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419888765
36.
*GilleyD. P.RootJ. R.CoxS. K. (2021). Development of mathematics and self-determination skills for young adults with extensive support needs. The Journal of Special Education, 54(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920902768.
37.
*HamdiH. (2020). Using Point of view video Modeling to teach Math to Students with autism spectrum Disorder in Saudi arabia. [doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University]. Duquesne scholarship collection. https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1874
38.
HaßlerB.MajorL.HennessyS. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12123
39.
HedgesS. H.OdomS. L.HumeK.SamA. (2018). Technology use as a support tool by secondary students with autism. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 22(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317717976
40.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
41.
HoardM. K.GearyD. C.HamsonC. O. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: performance of low- and average-IQ children. Mathematical Cognition, 5(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467999387324
42.
HongE. R.GongL.NinciJ.MorinK.DavisJ. L.KawaminamiS.ShiY.NoroF. (2017). A meta-analysis of single-case research on the use of tablet-mediated interventions for persons with ASD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 70, 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.09.013
43.
HongE. R.KawaminamiS.NeelyL.MorinK.DavisJ. L.GongL. Y. (2018). Tablet-based interventions for individuals with ASD: Evidence of generalization and maintenance effects.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.01.014
44.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
45.
JimenezB. A.AlamerK. (2018). Using graduated guidance to teach iPad accessibility skills to high school students with severe intellectual disabilities.Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418766293
46.
*JowettE. L.MooreD. W.AndersonA. (2012). Using an iPad-based video modelling package to teach numeracy skills to a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.682168
47.
KagoharaD. M.van der MeerL.RamdossS.O’ReillyM. F.LancioniG. E.DavisT. N.RispoliM.LangR.MarschikP. B.SutherlandD.GreenV. A.SigafoosJ. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027
48.
KearnsJ. F.Towles-ReevesE.KleinertH. L.KleinertJ. O. R.ThomasM. K. K. (2011). Characteristics of and implications for students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards. The Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 3–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909344223
49.
*KellemsR. O.CacciatoreG.HansenB. D.SabeyC. V.BusseyH. C.MorrisJ. R. (2021). Effectiveness of video prompting delivered via augmented reality for teaching transition-related math skills to adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(4), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420916879.
50.
KempC.CarterM. (2002). The social skills and social status of mainstreamed students with intellectual disabilities.Educational Psychology, 22(4), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341022000003097
51.
KiruE. W.DoablerC. T.SorrellsA. M.CoocN. A. (2018). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417745835
52.
*KnightV. F.KuntzE. M.BrownM. (2018). Paraprofessional-delivered video prompting to teach academics to students with severe disabilities in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(6), 2203–2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3476-2
53.
KnightV.McKissickB. R.SaundersA. (2013). A review of technology-based interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(11), 2628–2648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1814-y
KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (2014). Meta- and statistical analysis of single-case intervention research data: Quantitative gifts and a wish list. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.01.003
56.
LarwinK. H.AspirantiK. B. (2019). Measuring the academic outcomes of ipads for students with autism: A meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-019-00165-y
57.
Ledbetter-ChoK.O'ReillyM.LangR.WatkinsL.LimN. (2018). Meta-analysis of tablet-mediated interventions for teaching academic skills to individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(9), 3021–3036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3573-2
58.
LongH. M.BouckE. C.KellyH. (2022). An evidence-based practice synthesis of virtual manipulatives for students with ASD and IDD. In Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576221121654
59.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G.PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
60.
MuharibR.Ledbetter-ChoK.BrossL. A.LangR.HinsonM. D.CilekR. K. (2022). Handheld technology to support vocational skills of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in authentic settings: A systematic review.Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-021-00247-w
61.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
62.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics (CCSSM). Washington, DC: Author. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/NF/.
63.
NeelyL. C.GanzJ. B.DavisJ. L.BolesM. B.HongE. R.NinciJ.GillilandW. D. (2016). Generalization and maintenance of functional living skills for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A review and meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-015-0064-7
64.
OliveJ.MakarK.HoyosV.KorL. K.KoshelevaO.SträßerR. (2009). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. In HoylesC.LagrangeJ. B. (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain (pp. 133–177). New ICMI Study Series, volume 13. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_8
65.
OswaldT. M.BeckJ. S.IosifA. M.McCauleyJ. B.GilhoolyL. J.MatterJ. C.SolomonM. (2016). Clinical and cognitive characteristics associated with mathematics problem solving in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.Autism Research: Official Journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 9(4), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1524
66.
*ParkJ.BouckE. (2022). Teacher-delivered virtual manipulative mathematics intervention to individuals with extensive support needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 131, 104339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104339.
67.
*ParkJ.BouckE. C.FisherM. H. (2021). Using the virtual–representational–abstract with overlearning instructional sequence to students with disabilities in mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 54(4), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920912527.
68.
*ParkJ.BouckE. C.SmithJ. P. (2020). Using a Virtual Manipulative Intervention Package to Support Maintenance in Teaching Subtraction with Regrouping to Students with Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04225-4
69.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L. (2011a). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35(4), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511399147
70.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011b). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
71.
PeltierC. J.VannestK. J.MarbachJ. J. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of Schema Instruction Implemented in Single-Case Experimental Designs. The Journal of Special Education, 52(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918763173
72.
PriceS.JewittC.CrescenziL. (2015). The role of iPads in pre-school children's mark making development. Computers & Education, 87, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.003
73.
ReichowB.VolkmarF. R. (2010). Social skills interventions for individuals with autism: Evaluation for evidence-based practices within a best evidence synthesis framework. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(2), 149–166, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0842-0
*RootJ. R. (2016). Effects of modified schema-based instruction on real-world algebra problem solving of students with autism spectrum disorder and moderate intellectual disability. [Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
77.
*RootJ. R.BrowderD. M. (2019). Algebraic problem solving for middle school students with autism and intellectual disability. Exceptionality, 27(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2017.1394304
78.
*RootJ. R.BrowderD. M.SaundersA. F.LoY. Y. (2017a). Schema-based instruction with concrete and virtual manipulatives to teach problem solving to students with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516643592
79.
*RootJ. R.CoxS. K.GilleyD.WadeT. (2021). Using a virtual-representational-abstract integrated framework to teach multiplicative problem solving to middle school students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(7), 2284–2296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04674-2.
80.
*RootJ. R.CoxS. K.GonzalezS. (2019). Using modified schema-based instruction with technology-based supports to teach data analysis. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919833915
81.
RootJ. R.CoxS. K.McConomyM. A. (2022). Teacher-implemented modified schema-based instruction with middle-grade students with autism and intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221076147
82.
RootJ.SaundersA.SpoonerF.BroshC. (2017b). Teaching personal finance mathematical problem solving to individuals with moderate intellectual disability. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416681288
83.
SaundersA. F.SpoonerF.Ley DavisL. (2018). Using video prompting to teach mathematical problem solving of real-world video-simulation problems. Remedial and Special Education, 39(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517717042
84.
*ShurrJ.BouckE. C.BassetteL.ParkJ. (2021). Virtual versus concrete: a comparison of mathematics manipulatives for three elementary students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 36(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357620986944.
85.
SmithB. R.SpoonerF.WoodC. L. (2013). Using embedded computer-assisted explicit instruction to teach science to students with autism spectrum disorder.Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(3), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.10.010
86.
SongS. (2012). Mobile technology for children with autism spectrum disorder: Major trends and issues. Proceedings of IEEE symposium on e-learning, Canada: e-Management and e-Services, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/is3e.2012.6414954
87.
SpoonerF.RootJ. R.SaundersA. F.BrowderD. M. (2019). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 150–165, https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751055
88.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team.
89.
StillK.RehfeldtR. A.WhelanR.MayR.DymondS. (2014). Facilitating requesting skills using high-tech augmentative and alternative communication devices with individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review.Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(9), 1184–1199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.003
90.
ThomasC. N.PeeplesK. N.KennedyM. J.DeckerM. (2019). Riding the special education technology wave: Policy, obstacles, recommendations, actionable ideas, and resources.Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(5), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218819201
91.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web-based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University. https://www.singlecaseresearch.org
92.
WeiX.ChristianoE. R.YuJ. W.WagnerM.SpikerD. (2015). Reading and math achievement profiles and longitudinal growth trajectories of children with an autism spectrum disorder.Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 19(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313516549
93.
WengP.L.BouckE. C. (2014). Using video prompting via iPads to teach price comparison to adolescents with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(10), 1405–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.014
94.
*WengP.L.BouckE. C. (2016). An evaluation of app-based and paper-based number lines for teaching number comparison. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 27–40.
95.
What Works Clearinghouse (2020). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook (Version 4.1). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
96.
*YakubovaG.HughesE. M.ChenB. B. (2020). Teaching students with ASD to solve fraction computations using a video modeling instructional package. Research in Developmental Disabilities,101, Article 103637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103637
97.
YakubovaG.HughesE. M.HornbergerE. (2015). Video-based intervention in teaching fraction problem-solving to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2865–2875, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2449-y
98.
*YakubovaG.HughesE. M.ShinaberryM. (2016). Learning with technology: video modeling with concrete-representational-abstract sequencing for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(7), 2349–2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2768-7.
99.
Yucesoy-OzkanS.GulboyE.CakmakZ.CevherZ.Oz-AlkoyakH. (2022). Are Schema-Based and Modified Schema-Based Instruction Evidence-Based Practices for Students with Disabilities? A Meta-Analysis. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 57(4), 446–461.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
