Engaging in deliberate practice opportunities during special education teacher preparation may increase the implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices with fidelity in K-12 classrooms. We used a concurrent multiple baseline design across participants to evaluate the effects of providing immediate feedback through eCoaching with online Bug-In-Ear (BIE) technology on special education teacher candidates’ acquisition and sustained use of behavior specific praise (BSP) during Mursion™ classroom simulations. We also measured equitable praise rates and used the Behavior Specific Praise Observational Tool (BSP-OT) to evaluate teacher candidates’ praise variety. Results showed a functional relation between the intervention and teacher candidates’ use of BSP. Maintenance, equity, and praise variety data indicated promising social validity findings.
BillingsleyG.SmithS.SmithS.MerittJ. (2019). A systematic literature review of using immersive virtual reality technology in teacher education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(1), 65–90. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/176261/
2.
CohenJ.WongV.KrishnamachariA.BerlinR. (2020). Teacher coaching in a simulated environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720906217
3.
CorralD.CarpenterS. K.Clingan-SiverlyS. (2021). The effects of immediate versus delayed feedback on complex concept learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(4), 786–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820977739
4.
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2022). Revised 2022 standards workbook. Washington, DC: Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. https://caepnet.org/.
5.
DawsonM.Lignugaris/KraftB. (2017). Meaningful practice: Generalizing foundation teaching skills from TLE TeachLivE™ to the classroom. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416664184
6.
DiekerL. A.RodriguezJ. A.Lignugaris/KraftB.HynesM. C.HughesC. E. (2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413512683
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020a). Behavior-specific praise in pre-k-12 settings: Mapping the 50-year knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919843075
9.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020b). The impact of coaching on teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise in pre-k-12 settings: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919839221
10.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.100.3.363
11.
FingerhutJ.XuX.MoeyaertM. (2021). Selecting the proper Tau-U measure for single-case experimental designs: Development and application of a decision flowchart. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 15(3), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2021.1937851
12.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
13.
FraserDawn W.MarderTamara J.deBettencourtKristen M.MyersLinda A.HarrellRobert M.et al. (2020) (In this issue). Using a mixed-reality environment to train special educators working with students with autism spectrum disorder to implement discrete trial teaching. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 35(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357619844696
14.
FuM.LiS. (2020). The effects of immediate and delayed corrective feedback on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 2–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000388
15.
HartleL.KaczorowskiT. (2019). The positive aspects of Mursion when teaching higher education students. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 20(4), 71–78.
16.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research design to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100230
17.
HornA. L.GableR. A.BobzienJ. L.TonelsonS. W.RockM. L. (2020). Teaching young adults job skills using a constant time delay and eCoaching intervention package. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419828983
18.
HornA. L.RockM. L. (2022). Practice with feedback makes permanent: eCoaching with bug-in-ear technology during clinical experiences. Journal of Special Education Preparation, 2(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.33043/JOSEP.2.1.58-69
19.
HornA. L.RockM. L.DouglasK.BeanK.LaydenS. L.RoitschJ. (2022). The effects of teacher delivered bug in ear coaching on paraeducators and students. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 57(3), 287–302.
JoyceB.ShowersB. (2002). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22.
KazdinA. E. (2021). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
KornerI. N.BrownW. H. (1952). The mechanical third ear. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061630
24.
Landon-HaysM.Peterson-AhmadM. B.FrazierA. D. (2020). Learning to teach: How a simulated learning environment can connect theory to practice in general and special education educator preparation programs. Education Sciences, 10(7), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070184
25.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
MarkelzA.RidenB.FloressM.HeathJ.PavelkaS. (2022). Teachers’ use of specific, contingent, and varied praise. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 24(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720988250
27.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM.-D.BillingsleyB.BrownellD.KennedyM.LewisT.MaheadyL.RodriguezJ.ScheelerM. C.WinnJ.ZieglerD. (2017). January). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
28.
NagroS. A.ReganK.CoogleC.O’BrienK. M.RainesA. R.WadeC. B. (2022). Promoting reflective ability through a comprehensive field experience that combined video analysis and bug-in-ear coaching. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211022005
29.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2008). Professional standards for the accreditation of teacher preparation institutions. Washington, DC: NCATE.
30.
Peterson-AhmadM. B.PembertonJ.HoveyK. A. (2018). Virtual learning environments for teacher preparation. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 54(4), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2018.1515544
31.
RandolphK. M.ChubbC. S.HottB. L.Cruz-TorresE. (2021). iCoaching behavior-specific praise in a rural classroom. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520982302
32.
RandolphK. M.DuffyM. L.BradyM. P.WilsonC. L.ScheelerM. C. (2020). The impact of iCoaching on teacher-delivered opportunities to respond. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836414
33.
RockM. L. (2019). The eCoaching continuum for educators: Using technology to enrich professional development and improve student outcomes. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
34.
RockM.GreggM.GableR.ZigmondN.BlanksB.HowardP.BullockL. (2012). Time after time online: An extended study of virtual coaching during distant clinical practice. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–304. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/38623/
35.
RockM. L.GreggM.TheadB. K.AckerS. E.GableR. A.ZigmondN. (2009). Can you hear me now? Evaluation of an online wireless technology to provide real-time feedback to special education teachers-in-training. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406408330872
36.
RockM. L.SchumackerR.GreggM.GableR. A.ZigmondN. P.HowardP. (2014). How are they now? Longer term effects of eCoaching through online bug-in-ear technology. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414525048
37.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D.EnnisR. P. (2019). A systematic review of teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise on K–12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751054
38.
ScheelerM. C. (2008). Generalizing effective teaching skills: The missing link in teacher preparation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9051-0
39.
ScheelerM. C.LeeD. L. (2002). Using technology to deliver immediate corrective feedback to preservice teachers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(4), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021158805714
40.
ScheelerM. C.McKinnonK.StoutJ. (2012). Effects of immediate feedback delivered via webcam and bug-in-ear technology on preservice teacher performance. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406411401919
41.
ScheelerM. C.MoranoS.LeeD. L. (2018). Effects of immediate feedback using bug-in-ear with paraeducators working with students with autism. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416666645
42.
ScheelerM. C.RuhlK.McAfeeJ. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.117/0888406404022700407
43.
SinclairA. C.GeselS. A.LeJeuneL. M.LemonsC. J. (2020). A review of the evidence for real-time performance feedback to improve instructional practice. The Journal of Special Education, 54(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919878470
44.
VannestK. J.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling and Development, 93(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038
45.
Vince GarlandK. M.HoldenK.GarlandD. P. (2016). Individualized clinical coaching in the TLE TeachLivE lab: Enhancing fidelity of implementation of system of least prompts among novice teachers of students with autism. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415600769
46.
Vince GarlandK.VasquezE.IIIPearlC. (2012). Efficacy of individualized clinical coaching in a virtual reality classroom for increasing teachers’ fidelity of implementation of discrete trial teaching. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 502–515. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879642
47.
WolfeK.McCammonM. N.CheckA. (2022). Characteristics of learners with autism spectrum disorder. In ChezanL. C.WolfeK.DrasgowE. (Eds.), Evidence-based practices for supporting individuals with autism spectrum disorder (pp. 25–44). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
48.
ZimmermanK. N.LedfordJ. R.SeveriniK. E.PustejovskyJ. E.BartonE. E.LloydB. P. (2018). Single-case synthesis tools I: Comparing tools to evaluate SCD quality and rigor. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.003
49.
Zoder-MartellK. A.FloressM. T.BernasR. S.DufreneB. A.FoulksS. L. (2019). Training teachers to increase behavior-specific praise: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 35(4), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2019.1587802
