Special education technology and its use has largely focused on student concerns with accessing instruction. Where teachers have received attention, it has focused on classroom practices and their understanding of how to use technologies to support students. While some conversations have recently turned to the importance of student identities regarding technologies in special education, the identities of special education teachers in relation to technology use has received less attention. This study takes a narrative inquiry approach to describe a special education teacher who claimed multiple intersecting cultural/ethnic identities and a disability status. The findings from this 2-year engagement highlight how the teacher grappled with using technologies, not just for student learning, but for broader commitments to justice in special education contexts. Implications of this study elaborate on the need to plan special education teacher preparation and support for technologies that honors commitments to equity.
BakhtinM. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In HolquistM. (Eds.), The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M. Bakhtin. (trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
4.
BaradK. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality differences. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10-2-87
5.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
BatesonM. C. (2001). Composing a life. New York, NY: Grove Press.
7.
BergsonH.PaulN. M.PalmerW. S. (2004). Matter and memory. Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
8.
BettiniE. A.WalravenC.BillingsleyB.WilliamsT. O. (2018). Special educators of color are underrepresented across states: A challenge for leaders. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 31(1), 3–15.
9.
BillingsleyB.BettiniE. (2019). Special education teacher attrition and retention: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 697–744. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862495
10.
BillingsleyB. S.BettiniE. A.WilliamsT. O. (2019). Teacher racial/ethnic diversity: Distribution of special and general educators of color across schools. Remedial and Special Education, 40(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517733047
11.
BootF. H.DinsmoreJ.KhasnabisC.MacLachlanM. (2017). Intellectual disability and assistive technology: Opening the GATE wider. Frontiers in Public Health, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00010
12.
BovedaM.AronsonB. A. (2019). Special education preservice teachers, intersectional diversity, and the privileging of emerging professional identities. Remedial and Special Education, 40(4), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519838621
13.
BowlegL. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750
14.
BristolT. J.Martin-FernandezJ. (2019). The added value of Latinx and Black teachers for Latinx and Black students: Implications for policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219862573
ClandininD. J. (2016). Engaging in narrative inquiry. London, UK: Routledge.
22.
ClandininD. J.CaineV.LessardS. (2018). The relational ethics of narrative inquiry (pp. 230–230). London, UK: Routledge.
23.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (1996). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories––stories of teachers––school stories––stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025003024
24.
ClandininD. J.ConnollyF. M. (1986). Rhythms in teaching: The narrative study of teachers’ personal practical knowledge of classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(4), 377-387.
25.
ClandininD. J.PushorD.OrrA. M. (2007). Navigating sites for narrative inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106296218
26.
ClandininD. J.SteevesP.CaineV. (Eds.) (2013). Composing lives in transition: A narrative inquiry into the experiences of early school leavers. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
27.
ColesR. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
28.
CormierC. J.ScottL. A. (2021). Castaways on Gilligan’s Island: Minoritized special education teachers of color advocating for equity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 53(3), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920974701
29.
CourduffJ.MoktariA. (2021). Personal, cultural, and institutional perspectives of special education technology integrators: A narrative inquiry. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211019393
CraigC. J.HuberJ. (2007). Shaping and reshaping narrative inquiries in the midst of storied lives and contexts. In ClandininD. J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 251-279). Sage.
32.
CrenshawK. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1300.
33.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Touchstone.
34.
DunnD. S.AndrewsE. E. (2015). Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. American Psychologist, 70(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038636
35.
EdyburnD. L. (2004). 2003 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340401900407
36.
EdyburnD. L. (2013). Critical issues in advancing the special education technology evidence base. Exceptional Children, 80(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291308000107
GayG. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839022000014349
42.
Gomez-NavarroJ. (2020). An empty seat at the table: Examining general and special education teacher collaboration in response to intervention. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419850894
HarrisA.LeonardoZ. (2018). Intersectionality, race-gender subordination, and education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759071
45.
HesterO. R.BridgesS. A.RollinsL. H. (2020). ‘Overworked and underappreciated’: special education teachers describe stress and attrition. Teacher Development, 24(3), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1767189
JiménezD.GlaterJ. D. (2020). Student debt is a civil rights issue: The case for debt relief and higher education reform. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 55(1), 131–162.
KennyL.HattersleyC.MolinsB.BuckleyC.PoveyC.PellicanoE. (2016). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism, 20(4), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315588200
50.
KlingnerJ.ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE.HarryB.ZionS.TateW.RileyD. (2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n38.2005
51.
KozleskiE. B.ArtilesA. J.McCrayE. D.LacyL. (2014). Equity challenges in the accountability age. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris-KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 320–333). Abingdon, UK: Routledge& Francis.
52.
LefebvreA.WhiteM. (2012). Bergson, politics, and religion. Duke University Press.
53.
LyonsN.LaBoskeyV. (2002). Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
MoserI. (2006). Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751348
57.
NecaP.BorgesM. L.PintoP. C. (2020). Teachers with disabilities: A literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(12), 1192–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1776779
58.
ReddingC. (2019). A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student–teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319853545
59.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (n.d.). Section 504 Regulations, 34 C F.R. § 104.1 et seq.
60.
RiceM. (2021). Reconceptualizing teacher professional learning about technology integration as intra-active entanglements. Professional Development in Education, 47(3), 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1891953
61.
RiceM. (2022). Special education teachers’ use of technologies during the COVID-19 era (Spring 2020—Fall 2021). Tech Trends, 66, 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00700-5
62.
RiceM.OrtizK. (2021). Parents’ use of technological literacies to support their children with disabilities in online learning environments. Online Learning, 25(3), 208–229. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2407
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
65.
SchaeferL.LongJ. S.ClandininD. J. (2012). Questioning the research on early career teacher attrition and retention. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 58(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v58i1.55559
66.
SchonD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
StolzS. A.ThorburnM. (2021). Phenomenology, embodiment, and education: First-person methodologies of embodied subjectivity. In StolzS. A. (Ed.), The body, embodiment, and education (pp. 60–78). London, UK: Routledge.
WoodR.HappéF. (2021). What are the views and experiences of autistic teachers? Findings from an online survey in the UK. Disability & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1916888
