A deductive, sequential mixed design was used to better understand the internal aspects of performance-based self-evaluation activities as related to teacher preparation. A modified theory of change informed the investigation of a subset (N = 15) of teacher candidates from a larger study, who all showed significant improvements in their teaching abilities after engaging in video analysis. Teacher candidates’ video analysis activities were further analyzed to better understand their self-evaluation accuracy and enthusiasm for engaging in such teacher preparation activities. Results indicated candidates rated their perceived ability significantly higher than their observed instructional ability at all four timepoints. Candidates who were most enthusiastic about engaging in video analysis with self-evaluation were the least accurate at rating their own instructional abilities. Additional findings about the association between internal factors (i.e., attitude and accuracy) and the implications for self-evaluation as a reliable form of performance-based assessment within teacher preparation are discussed.
AlexanderM.WilliamsN.NelsonK. (2012). When you can’t get there: Using video self-monitoring as a tool for changing the behaviors of pre-service teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(4), 18–24. https://doi-org.mutex.gmu.edu/10.1177/875687051203100404
2.
BaecherL.KungS. C.JewkesA.RosaliaC. (2013). The role of video for self-evaluation in early field experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.08.001
3.
BastianK. C.LysD.PanY. (2018). A framework for improvement: Analyzing performance-assessment scores for evidence-based teacher preparation program reforms. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 448–462.
BrownellM. T.JonesN. D.SohnH.StarkK. (2020). Improving teaching quality for students with disabilities: Establishing a warrant for teacher education practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419880351
CalandraB.GurvitchR.LundJ. (2008). An exploratory study of digital video editing as a tool for teacher preparation. Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 137–153.
CollinsL. W.SweigartC. A.LandrumT. J.CookB. G. (2017). Navigating common challenges and pitfalls in the first years of special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(4), 213–222. https://doi-org.mutex.gmu.edu/10.1177/0040059916685057
10.
CondermanG.WalkerD. A. (2015). Assessing dispositions in teacher preparation programs: Are candidates and faculty seeing the same thing?Teacher Educator, 50(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2015.1010053
11.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
12.
CuthrellK. C.LysD. B.FogartyE. A.DobsonE. E. (2016). Using edTPA data to improve programs. In PollyD. (Ed.), Evaluating teacher education programs through performance based assessments (pp. 67–79). IGI Global.
DenizJ. (2012). Video recorded feedback for self regulation of prospective music teachers in piano lessons. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(1), 17–25.
16.
EtscheidtS.CurranC. M.SawyerC. M. (2012). Promoting reflection in teacher preparation programs: A multilevel model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406411420887
17.
GrahamM.MilanowskiA.MillerJ. (2012). Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. U.S. Department of Education, the Center for Educator Compensation Reform. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532068.pdf
18.
HamodiC.López-PastorV. M.López-PastorA. T. (2017). If I experience formative assessment whilst studying at university, will I put it into practice later as a teacher? Formative and shared assessment in initial teacher education (ITE). European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 171–190. https://doi-org.mutex.gmu.edu/10.1080/02619768.2017.1281909
19.
HolzbergerD.PhilippA.KunterM. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774–786. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032198
20.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
21.
JenkinsJ. J. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ observations of experienced teachers. Physical Educator, 71(2), 303–319.
22.
JohnsonB. R.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 12–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
23.
KearneyS. (2013). Improving engagement: The use of “authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning” to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 875–891. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.751963
24.
KearneyS.PerkinsT.Kennedy-ClarkS. (2016). Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: Analysing the relative validity of the AASL (authentic assessment for sustainable learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1039484
25.
Kelaher-YoungA. J.CarverC. L. (2013). Shifting attention: Using learning self-assessment tools during initial coursework to focus teacher candidates on student learning. Teacher Education Quarterly, 40(4), 111–133.
26.
KellerC. L.BradyM. P.TaylorR. L. (2005). Using self evaluation to improve student teacher interns’ use of specific praise. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(4), 368–376.
27.
MartinF.ErtzbergerJ. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76–85.
NagroS. A. (2019). Reflecting on others before reflecting on self: Using video evidence to guide teacher candidates’ reflective practices. Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248711987270
30.
NagroS. A.deBettencourtL. U. (2018). Reflection activities within clinical experiences: An important component of field-based teacher education. In HodgesT. E.BaumA. C. (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Field-Based Teacher Education (pp. 565–586). IGI Global.
31.
NagroS. A.deBettencourtL. U.RosenbergM. S.CarranD. T.WeissM. P. (2017). The effects of guided video analysis on teacher candidates’ reflective ability and instructional skills. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 7–25. https://doi-org/10.1177/0888406416680469
32.
NagroS. A.HirschS. E.KennedyM. J. (2020). A self-led approach to improving classroom management practices using video analysis. Teaching Exceptional Children. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920914329
33.
NoorM. N.YahayaA. S.RamliN. A.BakriA. M. (2014). Filling missing data using interpolation methods: Study on the effect of fitting distribution. Key Engineering Materials, 594–595, 889–895.
34.
PecheoneR. L.ChungR. R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education: The performance assessment for California teachers (pact). Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 22–36.
35.
PodgorsekM.LipovecA. (2017). Self-assessment ability of pre-service teachers. New Educational Review, 48(2), 213–223.
36.
RossJ. A.BruceC. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035
SchmidtD. A.BaranE.ThompsonA. D.KoehlerM. J.MishraP.ShinT. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
39.
SchoonenboomJ.JohnsonR. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
40.
SneadL. O.FreibergH. J. (2019). Rethinking student teacher feedback: Using a self-assessment resource with student teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117734535
41.
Tait-McCutcheonS.KnewstubbB. (2018). Evaluating the alignment of self, peer and lecture assessment in an Aotearoa New Zealand pre-service teacher education course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1408771
42.
TeddlieC. B.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
43.
van EsE. A.CashenM.BarnhartT.AugerA. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop preservice teachers’ vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 165–187. http://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1317125
44.
WrightM.EllisD.BaxterA. (2012). The effect of immediate or delayed video-based teacher self-evaluation on head start teachers’ use of praise. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 26(2), 187–198.
