In undergraduate college courses, assignments designed to showcase preservice teacher learning traditionally include classroom presentations, papers, projects, and tests. Often, these activities do not translate into permanent products that will be utilized outside the course. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of self-created video podcasts on content acquisition among undergraduate preservice special education teachers. Preservice teachers in two undergraduate courses were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) podcast condition (treatment group; n = 25) and (2) traditional live presentation condition (control group; n = 25). The participants in each group were then assigned targeted instructional strategies for teaching mathematics. Pre–post measures included a comprehensive multiple-choice test and an open-ended assessment targeting each assigned strategy. During the last 2 weeks of the semester, participants presented their final product and completed the posttests. Results suggested that the participants in the treatment group (podcasts) acquired a deeper understanding of their assigned strategy than the participants from the comparison group (live presentations). The treatment group also outperformed the control group on the comprehensive multiple-choice test.
AkpanJ. P.BeardL. A. (2014). Assistive technology and mathematics education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2, 219–222.
2.
AllsoppD. H.HaleyK. C. (2015). A synthesis of research on teacher education, mathematics, and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 13, 177–206.
3.
AlvesK. D.KennedyM. J.KellemsR. O.WexlerJ.RodgersW. J.RomigJ. E.PeeplesK. N. (2017). Improving preservice teacher vocabulary instruction: A randomized controlled trial. Teacher Education and Special Education. doi:10.1177/0888406417727044
4.
BaglamaB.YikmisA.DemirokM. S. (2017). Special education teachers’ views on using technology in teaching mathematics. European Journal of Special Education Research, 2, 120–133.
5.
BakerS.GerstenR.LeeD. S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51–73.
6.
BryantB. R.BryantD. P.KethleyC.KimS. A.PoolC.SeoY. J. (2008). Preventing mathematics difficulties in the primary grades: The critical features of instruction in textbooks as part of the equation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 21–35.
7.
CarleA. C.JaffeeD.MillerD. (2009). Engaging college science students and changing academic achievement with technology: A quasi-experimental preliminary investigation. Computers & Education, 52, 376–380.
8.
CarlisleA. A.ThomasC. N.McCathrenR. B. (2016). The effectiveness of using a content acquisition podcast to teach phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and phonics to preservice special education teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31, 87–98.
9.
ClarkR. E. (2009). Translating research into new instructional technologies for higher education: The active ingredient process. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 4–18.
10.
CvikoA.McKenneyS.VoogtJ. (2014). Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy: A cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 72, 68–79.
11.
DiekerL. A.KennedyM. J.SmithS.VasquezE.IIIRockM.ThomasC. (2014). Use of technology in the preparation of pre-service teachers (Document No. IC-11). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. Retrieved fromhttp://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
12.
DoablerC. T.CaryM. S.JungjohannK.ClarkeB.FienH.BakerS.…ChardD. (2012). Enhancing core mathematics instruction for students at risk for mathematics disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44, 48–57.
13.
DoablerC. T.FienH.Nelson-WalkerN. J.BakerS. K. (2012). Evaluating three elementary mathematics programs for presence of eight research-based instructional design principles. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 200–211.
14.
ElyE.KennedyM. J.PullenP. C.WilliamsM. C.HirschS. E. (2014). Improving instruction of future teachers: A multimedia approach that supports implementation of evidence-based vocabulary practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 35–43.
15.
EvansC. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50, 491–498.
16.
GagnonJ. C.MacciniP. (2007). Teacher-reported use of empirically validated and standards-based instructional approaches in secondary mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 43–56.
17.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242.
18.
HeilesenS. B. (2010). What is the academic efficacy of podcasting?Computers & Education, 55, 1063–1068.
19.
HenrieC. R.HalversonL. R.GrahamC. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
KennedyM. J.AroninS.O’NealM.NewtonJ. R.ThomasC. N. (2014). Creating multimedia-based vignettes with embedded evidence-based practices: A tool for supporting struggling learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29, 15–30.
23.
KennedyM. J.DriverM. K.PullenP. C.ElyE.ColeM. T. (2013). Improving teacher candidates’ knowledge of phonological awareness: A multimedia approach. Computers & Education, 64, 42–51.
24.
KennedyM. J.HartJ. E.KellemsR. O. (2011). Using enhanced podcasts to augment limited instructional time in teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 87–105.
25.
KennedyM. J.KellemsR. O.ThomasC. N.NewtonJ. R. (2015). Using content acquisition podcasts to deliver core content to preservice teacher candidates. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 163–168.
26.
KennedyM. J.NewtonJ. R.HainesS. J.Walther-ThomasC. S.KellemsR. O. (2012). A triarchic model for teaching “Introduction to Special Education”: Case studies, content acquisition podcasts, and effective feedback. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20, 251–275.
27.
KennedyM. J.ThomasC. N. (2012). Effects of content acquisition podcasts to develop preservice teachers’ knowledge of positive behavioral interventions and supports. Exceptionality, 20, 1–19.
28.
KennedyM. J.ThomasC. N.MeyerP. J. (2014). Using evidence-based multimedia to improve vocabulary performance of adolescents with LD: A UDL approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 72–86. doi:10.1177/0731948713507262
29.
KennedyM. J.WagnerD.StegallJ.LembkeE.MiciakJ.AlvesK. D.…BrownL. (2016). Using content acquisition podcasts to improve teacher candidate knowledge of curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 82, 303–320. doi:10.1177/0014402915615885
30.
KunterM.KlusmannU.BaumertJ.RichterD.VossT.HachfeldA. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 805.
31.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.MurphyK. (2012). Promoting special education preservice teacher expertise. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44, 1.
32.
MacciniP.GagnonJ. C. (2006). Mathematics instructional practices and assessment accommodations by secondary special and general educators. Exceptional Children, 72, 217–234.
33.
MayerR. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63, 760.
34.
MayerR. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM. D.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.…ZieglerD. (2017, January). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
36.
NagroS. A.WeissM. P.DaleyJ. T. (2017). Getting past “I Hate Math!” In MurawskiW. W.ScottK. L. (Eds.), What really works with exceptional learners (pp. 6–22). Corwin.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
39.
SmithS. J.OkoloC. (2010). Response to intervention and evidence-based practices: Where does technology fit?Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 257–272.
40.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: A supplement to the national education technology plan. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
Van BoxtelJ. M. (2017). Common core expertise for special education teachers: What do special education administrators think is important?Teacher Education Quarterly, 44, 57.
42.
Van IngenS.EskelsonS. L.AllsoppD. (2016). Evidence of the need to prepare prospective teachers to engage in mathematics consultations. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 18, 73–91.
43.
WeissM. P.EvmenovaA. S.KennedyM. J.DukeJ. M. (2016). Creating content acquisition podcasts (caps) for vocabulary: The intersection of content, pedagogy, and technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31, 228–235.
