Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of a functional communication training intervention consisting of systematic prompting and natural reinforcement on the challenging behaviors of two children with autism spectrum disorder aged 5 and 6 years old. Children who had a history of challenging behavior, consisting of self-injury and disruption, were taught to request preferred stimuli through the GoTalk Now™ application on an iPad ^® . Using a reversal design, the findings demonstrated a functional relation between functional communication training with the use of the GoTalk Now application and the decreased levels of challenging behaviors. Specifically, one child demonstrated zero levels of challenging behaviors and one child showed a less substantial decrease of challenging behaviors during intervention phases. Directions for future research and implications for practice are discussed.

Keywords

functional communicating training autism spectrum disorder speech-generating devices challenging behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual (5th ed. rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

Attainment Company. (nd). Retrieved from https://www.attainmentcompany.com/gotalk-now

Bailey

J. S.

Burch

M. R.

(2002). Research methods in applied behavior analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Carr

E. G.

Durand

V. M.

(1985). Reducing problem behaviors through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.

Chiang

H. M.

(2008). Expressive communication of children with autism: The use of challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 966–972.

Chung

M. C.

Jenner

Chamberlain

Corbett

(1995). One year follow up pilot study on communication skill and challenging behaviour. European Journal of Psychiatry, 9, 83–95.

Cooper

J. O.

Heron

T. E.

Heward

W. L.

(2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Durand

V. M.

Merges

(2001). Functional communication training: A contemporary behavior analytic intervention for problem behaviors. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 110–119.

Einfeld

S. E.

Tonge

B. J.

(1996). Population prevalence of psychopathology in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: II Epidemiological findings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 40, 99–109.

10.

Emerson

(2000). Challenging behavior: Analysis and intervention in people with intellectual disabilities (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Falcomata

T. S.

Wacker

D. P.

Ringdahl

J. E.

Vinquist

Dutt

(2013). An evaluation of generalization of mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 444–454. doi:10.1002/jaba.37

12.

Franco

J. H.

Lang

R. L.

O’Reilly

M. F.

Chang

J. M.

Sigafoos

Rispoli

(2009). Functional analysis and treatment of inappropriate vocalizations using a speech-generating device for a child with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 146–155. doi:10.1177/1088357609338380

13.

Ganz

(2015). AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 203–214. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532

14.

Greer

B. D.

Fisher

W. W.

Saini

Ownes

T. M.

Jones

J. K.

(2016). Functional communication training during reinforcement schedule thinning: An analysis of 25 applications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 105–121. doi:10.1002/jaba.265

15.

Horner

Carr

Halle

McGee

Odom

Wolery

(2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–180.

16.

Kaiser

A. P.

Cai

Hancock

T. B.

Foster

E. M.

(2002). Teacher reported behavior problems and language delays in boy and girls enrolled in Head Start. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 23–39.

17.

Kazdin

A. E.

(1982). Single case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

18.

Koegel

L. K.

Koegel

R. L.

Hurley

Frea

W. D.

(1992). Improving social skills and disruptive behavior in children with autism through self-management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 341–353.

19.

Kratochwill

T. R.

Hitchcock

J. H.

Horner

R. H.

Levin

J. R.

Odom

S. L.

Rindskoff

D. M.

Shadish

W. R.

(2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. doi:10.1177/0741932512452794

20.

Kurtz

P. F.

Boelter

E. W.

Jarmolowicz

D. P.

Chin

M. D.

Hagopian

L. P.

(2011). An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2935–2942. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.009

21.

Lancioni

O’Reilly

Curvo

Singh

Sigafoos

Didden

(2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2006.06.003

22.

Light

Drager

(2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216. doi:10.1080/07434610701553635

23.

Lorah

E. R.

Tincani

Dodge

Gilroy

Hickey

Hantula

. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25, 637–649. doi:10.1007/s10882-013-9337-1

24.

Matson

J. L.

Nebel-Schwalm

(2007). Assessing challenging behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorders: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 567–579. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2006.08.001

25.

Matson

J. L.

Wilkins

Macken

(2008). The relationship of challenging behaviors to severity and symptoms of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2, 29–44. doi:10.1080/19315860802611415

26.

McClintock

Hall

Oliver

(2003). Risk markers associated with challenging behaviors in people with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 405–416.

27.

Muharib

Alzrayer

N. M.

(2018). The use of high-tech speech-generating devices as an evidence-based practice for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5, 43–57. doi:10.1007/s40489-017-0122-4

28.

Neidert

P. L.

Iwata

B. A.

Dozier

C. L

. (2005). Treatment of multiply controlled problem behavior with procedural variations of differential reinforcement. Exceptionality, 13, 45–53. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1301_6

29.

Neidert

P. L.

Rooker

G. W.

Bayles

M. W.

Miller

J. R.

(2013). Functional analysis of problem behavior. In Reed

D. D.

Reed

F. D. D. G.

Luiselli

J. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of crisis intervention and developmental disabilities: Issues in clinical child psychology (pp. 147–167). New York, NY: Springer.

30.

Olive

M. L.

Lang

R. B.

Davis

T. N.

(2008). An analysis of the effects of functional communication and a voice output communication aid for a child with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 232–236. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2007.06.002

31.

O’Reilly

Rispoli

Davis

Machalicek

Lang

Sigafoos

… Didden

. (2010). Functional analysis of challenging behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders: A summary of 10 cases. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2009.07.001

32.

Park

Yelland

Taffe

Gray

(2012). Brief report: the relationship between language skills, adaptive behavior, and emotional and behavior problems in preschoolers with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2761–2766. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1534-8

33.

Peluso

(2012). The fast-paced iPad revolution: Can educators stay up to date and relevant about these ubiquitous devices? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 125–127. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01310.x

34.

Rispoli

Camargo

Machalicek

Lang

Sigafoos

(2014). Functional communication training in the treatment of problem behavior maintained by access to rituals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 580–593. doi:10.1002/jaba.130

35.

Schroeder

S. R.

Schroeder

C. S.

Smith

Dalldorf

(1978). Prevalence of self-injurious behavior in a large state facility for the retarded: A three-year follow-up study. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 8, 261–269.

36.

Sigafoos

(2000). Communication development and aberrant behavior in children with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 168–176.

37.

Sigafoos

Arthur

O’Reilly

(2003). Challenging behavior and developmental disability. London, England: Whurr.

38.

Sigafoos

Lancioni

G. E.

O’Reilly

Achmadi

Stevens

Roche

… Green

V. E

. (2013). Teaching two boys with autism spectrum disorders to request the continuation of toy play using an iPad-based voice-generating device. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 923–930. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.04.002

39.

Smith

Fox

. (2003). Systems of service delivery: A synthesis of evidence relevant to young children at risk of or who have challenging behavior. Tampa: Center for Evidence-Based Practice, Young Children with Challenging Behavior, University of South Florida. Retrieved from http://challengingbehavior.fmhi.usf.edu/explore/publications_docs/systems_of_service.pdf

40.

Thunberg

Ahlsen

Sandberg

A. D.

(2007). Children with autistic spectrum disorders and speech-generating devices: Communication in different activities at home. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 457–479. doi:10.1080/02699200701314963

41.

van der Meer

Sutherland

O’Reilly

M. F.

Lancioni

G. E.

Sigafoos

(2012). A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1247–1257. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2012.04.005

42.

Walker

V. L.

Snell

M. E.

(2013). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 117–131. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.785020

43.

Wodka

E. L.

Mathy

Kalb

(2013). Predictors of phrase and fluent speech in children with autism and severe language delay. Pediatrics, 131, 1128–1134. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2221

44.

Wong

Odom

S. L.

Hume

Cox

A. W.

Fettig

Kucharczyk

… Schultz

T. R

. (2013). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.

Effects of Functional Communication Training Using GoTalk Now TM iPad ® Application on Challenging Behavior of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References