This review was conducted to evaluate the current body of scholarly research regarding the use of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) to teach mathematics to students with specific learning disability (SLD). For many years, computers are utilized for educational purposes. However, the effectiveness of CAI for teaching mathematics to this specific group of students is unclear. First, a brief review of the diagnosis of SLD, the importance of mathematics instruction for these students, and the use of computers in the classroom is provided. Next, a review of the current body of research is presented. Finally, suggestions for future research are discussed. Since 1981, a total of 25 research studies have been published, focusing exclusively on using CAI for teaching mathematics to students with SLD. This review examines the current body of research for this area. In addition, the author provides recommendations for future research on this important subject for this category of students.
AbrahamR.SlateJ.SaxonD.BarnesW. (2014). College-readiness in math: A conceptual analysis of the literature. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 30, 4–34. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nyclsa.org/
2.
BahrC.RiethH. (1989). The effects of instructional computer games and drill and practice software on learning disabled students’ mathematics achievement. Computers in the Schools, 6, 87–101. doi:10.1300/J025v06n03_08
3.
BeanT.O’BrianD.FangZ. (2012). Past and future directions in content area literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 275–278. doi:10.1002/JAAL.00138
4.
BraggL. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of mathematical games as a pedagogical tool for children’s learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1445–1467. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9349-9
5.
BryantB.OkM.KangE.KimM.LangR.BryantD.PfannestielK. (2015). Performance of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities on multiplication facts comparing teacher-mediated and technology-mediated interventions: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 255–272. doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9218-z
6.
BurksR. (2011). Survivor math: Using pop culture to enhance learning mathematics. Primus: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 21, 62–72. doi:10.1080/10511970902870364
7.
ChiangB. (1986). Initial learning and transfer effects of microcomputer drills on LD students’ multiplication skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 118–123. doi:10.2307/1510360
8.
ChristensenC.GerberM. (1990). Effectiveness of computerized drill and practice games in teaching basic math facts. Exceptionality, 1, 149–165. doi:10.1080/09362839009524751
9.
ChristmannE.BadgettJ.LuckingR. (1997). Progressive comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on the academic achievement of secondary students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 325–337. doi:10.1080/08886504.1997.10782202
10.
CreswellJ. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
11.
DitzlerC.HongE.StrudlerN. (2016). How tablets are utilized in the classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48, 181–193. doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1172444
12.
FosterK. (1983). The influence of computer-assisted instruction and workbook of multiplication facts by learning disabled and normal students (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 3953.
FuchsL.FuchsD.HamlettC.AppletonA. (2002). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on the mathematical problem-solving performance of students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 90–106. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00036
15.
GleasonM.CarnineD.BorieroD. (1990). Improving CAI effectiveness with attention to instructional design in teaching story problems to mildly handicapped students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 129–136. doi:10.1177/016264349001000301
HayL. (1981). Using the computer to help prove theorems. Mathematics Teacher, 74, 132–138. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ntcm.org/
18.
HowellR.SidorenkoE.JuricaJ. (1987). The effects of computer use on the acquisition of multiplication facts by a student with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 336–341. doi:10.1177/002221948702000606
19.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 20 U.S.C. § 1401.
IrishC. (2002). Using peg- and keyword mnemonics and computer-assisted instruction to enhance basic multiplication performance in elementary students with learning and cognitive disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17, 29–40. doi:10.1177/016264340201700403
22.
JanisseH.BhavnagriN.LiX.StantonB.JohnsS.Butler-BarnesS. (2014). Classroom computers and social interaction among low-income preschool children. Dialog, 17, 84–89. Retrieved fromhttps://journals.uncc.edu/dialog/
23.
KlingnerJBoardmanA.McMasterK. (2013). What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices?Exceptional Children, 79, 195–211. doi:10.1177/001440291307900205
24.
KorteringL.deBettencourtL.BrazielP. (2005). Improving performance in high school algebra: What students with learning disabilities are saying. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 191–203. doi:10.2307/1593658
25.
KoscinskiS.GastD. (1993). Computer-assisted instruction with constant time delay to teach multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 157–168. Retrieved fromhttp://www.erlbaum.com/
26.
KumarR.ChaturvediS. (2014). Computer assisted instruction (CAI) as remedial teaching on diagnostic test of learning disability (DTLD) for fifth grade students. Education Quest: An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 5, 169–177. doi:10.5958/2230-7311.2014.00012.9
27.
KunkaA. (1984). A modality-instruction interaction study of elementary learning disabled students using two types of electronic learning aids for math instruction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 387.
28.
LiQ. (2002). Exploration of collaborative learning and communication in an educational environment using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Research on Technology, 34, 503–516. doi:10.1080/15391523.2002.10782364
29.
MaritaS.HordC. (2017). Review of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 29–40. doi:10.1177/0731948716657495
30.
McDermottP.WatkinsM. (1983). Computerized vs. conventional remedial instruction for learning-disabled pupils. Journal of Special Education, 17, 81–88. doi:10.1177/002246698301700110
31.
McLeskeyJ. (2007). Reflections on inclusion: Classic articles that shaped our thinking. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
32.
MercerC.PullenP. (2009). Teaching students with learning disabilities (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson Education.
33.
MolnarA. (1997). Computers in education: A brief history. T.H.E. Journal, 24, 63–68. Retrieved fromhttps://thejournal.com/
34.
MontagueM.JitendraA. (2006). Teaching mathematics to middle school students with learning difficulties. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2014). The state of learning disabilities (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Author.
37.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
38.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39.
NordnessP.HaverkostA.VolberdingA. (2011). An examination of hand-held computer-assisted instruction on subtraction skills for second grade students with learning and behavioral disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26, 15–24. doi:10.1177/016264341102600402
40.
OkM.BryantD. (2016). Effects of a strategic intervention with iPad practice on the multiplication fact performance of fifth-grade students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39, 146–158. doi:10.1177/0731948715598285
41.
OkoloC. (1992a). The effect of computer-assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the arithmetic facts and proficiency and continuing motivation of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 3, 195–211. doi:10.1080/09362839209524815
42.
OkoloC. (1992b). The effects of computer-based attribution retraining on the attributions, persistence, and mathematics computation of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 327–334. doi:10.1177/002221949202500507
43.
PattonJ.CroninM.BassettD.KoppelA. (1997). A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: Preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 178–187. doi:10.1177/002221949703000205
44.
PearceM.NorwichB. (1986). A comparative evaluation of direct teaching and computer assisted methods to teach number estimation skills to children with moderate learning difficulties. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 1, 13–22. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/
45.
PierangeloR.GiulianiG. (2002). Assessment in special education: A practical approach. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
46.
PresseyS. (1926). A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores and teaches. The Journal of School and Society, 23, 373–376. Retrieved fromhttp://www.johndeweysociety.org/
47.
RaskindM.GoldbergR.HigginsE.HermanK. (2002). Teaching “life success” to students with LD: Lessons learned from a 20-year study. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37, 201–208. doi:10.1177/105345120203700402
48.
RauM.AlevenV.RummelN. (2017). Supporting students in making sense of connections and in becoming perceptually fluent in making connections among multiple graphical representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 355–373. doi:10.1037/edu0000145
49.
RoweD.TestD. (2012). Effects of simulation to teach students with disabilities basic finance skills. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 237–248. doi:10.1177-0741932512448218
50.
SaineP. (2012). iPod, iPads, and the SMARTBoard: Transforming literacy instruction and student learning. New England Reading Association Journal, 47, 74–79. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nereading.org/
51.
ShiahR.MastropieriM.ScruggsT.FulkB. (1994–1995). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematical problem solving of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 5, 131–161. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex0503_2
52.
StellingwerfB.LieshoutE. (1999). Manipulatives and number sentences in computer aided arithmetic word problem solving. Instructional Science, 27, 459–476. doi:10.1007/BF00891974
53.
StultzS. L. (2013). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction for teaching mathematics to students with specific learning disability. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 2, 1–13. Retrieved fromhttp://www.josea,info
54.
TrifilettiJ.FrithG.ArmstrongS. (1984). Microcomputers versus resource rooms for LD students: A preliminary investigation of the effects on math skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 69–76. doi:10.2307/1510263
55.
TzivinikouS.PapoutsakiK. (2016). Studying teaching methods, strategies and best practices for young children with special educational needs. Early Childhood Development and Care, 186, 971–980. doi:10.1080/03004430.2015.1071101
WattS.WatkinsJ.AbbittJ. (2016). Teaching algebra to students with learning disabilities: Where have we come and where should we go?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 437–447. doi:10.1177/002221941456220
58.
WilsonC.MajsterekD.SimmonsD. (1996). The effects of computer-assisted versus teacher-directed instruction on the multiplication performance of elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 382–390. doi:10.1177/002221949602900406
59.
WilsonJ.NotarC. (2003). Use of computers by secondary teachers: A report from a university service area. Education, 123, 695–704. Retrieved fromhttps://www.questia.com/
60.
WilsonL. (1993). Enhancing the academic skills of adolescent students with learning disabilities through computer-assisted instruction (technical report). Cumberland, MD: Nova Scotia Community College, Centre for Learning Assistance and Research.
61.
XinF.DeGregorioV.DrudgingB.VespeP. (1996). Computer-assisted cooperative learning in an inclusive classroom. Glassboro, NJ: Rowan College Press.
