Video-based instruction (VBI) has a substantial amount of research supporting its use with individuals with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities. However, it has typically been implemented as a treatment package containing multiple interventions. Additionally, there are procedural variations of VBI. Thus, it is difficult to determine which components and characteristics/parameters of VBI are more or less responsible for behavior change. Researchers have conducted comparative studies using single-subject design research to understand the relative effectiveness of the components and parameters routinely used as part of VBI treatment packages. The purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature on VBI comparative studies whereby component and parametric analyses were conducted. Twenty-four studies met our inclusion criteria. The features and results of these studies are summarized, and implications for future research and practice are discussed.
*AkmanogluN. N.YanardagM.BatuE. S. (2014). Comparing video modeling and graduated guidance together and video modeling alone for teaching role-playing skills to children with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 17–31.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
*AyresK. M.LangoneJ. (2007). A comparison of video modeling perspectives for students with autism. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22, 15–30.
4.
BandaD. R.DogoeM. S.MatusznyR. M. (2011). Review of video prompting studies with persons with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 514–527.
5.
BelliniS.AkullianJ. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, 264–287.
6.
*BennettK. D.GutierrezA.HonsbergerT. (2013). A comparison of video prompting with and without voice-over narration on the clerical skills of adolescents with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 1273–1281.
7.
*Cannella-MaloneH. I.WheatonJ. E.WuP.TullisC. A.ParkJ. H. (2012). Comparing the effects of video prompting with and without error correction on skill acquisition for students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 332–344.
8.
*CihakD. F.SchraderL. (2009). Does the model matter? Comparing video self-modeling and video adult modeling for task acquisition and maintenance by adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23, 9–20.
9.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Applied research in education and behavioral sciences. In GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
11.
HumeK.OdomS. (2007). Effects of an individual work system on the independent functioning of students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1166–1180. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0260-5
12.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. doi:10.1177/0741932512452794
14.
MacDuffG. S.KrantzP. J.McClannahanL. E. (1993). Teaching children with autism to use photographic activity schedules: Maintenance and generalization of complex response chains. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 89–97. doi:10.1901/jaba.1993.26-89
15.
*MarcusA.WilderD. A. (2009). Comparison of peer video modeling and self video modeling to teach textual responses in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 335–341.
16.
McCoyK.HermansenE. (2007). Video modeling for individuals with autism: A review of model types and effects. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 183–213.
17.
McDowellL. S.GutierrezA.BennettK. D. (2015). Analysis of live modeling plus prompting and video modeling for teaching imitation to children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 30, 333–351. doi:10.1002/bin.1419
18.
MechlingL. (2005). The effects of instructor-created video programs to teach students with disabilities: A literature review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20, 25–36.
19.
*MechlingL. C.AyresK. M. (2012). A comparative study: Completion of fine motor office related tasks by high school students with autism using video models on large and small screen sizes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2364–2373. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1484-1
20.
*MechlingL. C.AyresK. M.FosterA. L.BryantK. J. (2013). Comparing the effects of commercially available and custom made video prompting for teaching cooking skills to high school students with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 371–383. doi:10.1177/0741932513494856
21.
MechlingL. C.AyresK. M.PurrazzellaK.PurrazzellaK. (2014). Continuous video modeling to prompt completion of multi-component tasks by adults with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 3–16.
22.
*MechlingL. C.BryantK. J.SpencerG. P.AyresK. M. (2015). Comparison of methods for demonstrating passage of time when using computer based video prompting. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 56–70.
23.
*MechlingL. C.CollinsT. S. (2012). Comparison of the effects of video models with and without verbal cueing on task completion by young adults with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 223–235.
24.
*MechlingL. C.YouhouseI. R. (2012). Comparison of task performance by students with autism and moderate intellectual disabilities when presenting video models on large and small screen sizes. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27, 1–14.
25.
*MiltenbergerC. A.CharlopM. H. (2015). The comparative effectiveness of portable video modeling vs. traditional video modeling interventions with children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 341–358. doi:10.1007/s10882-014-9416-y
26.
*OzkanS. Y. (2013). Comparison of peer and self video modeling in teaching first aid skills to children with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 88–102.
27.
*PalechkaG.MacDonaldR. (2010). A comparison of the acquisition of play skills using instructor created video models and commercially available videos. Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 457–474.
28.
*PlavnickJ. B.FerreriS. J. (2011). Establishing verbal repertoires in children with autism using function based video modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 747–766. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-747
29.
QuillK. A. (1995). Visually cued instruction for children with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 10, 10–20.
30.
*RaynerC. (2011). Sibling and adult video modeling to teach a student with autism: Imitation skills and intervention suitability. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 14, 331–338.
31.
RaynorC.DenholmC.SigafoosJ. (2009). Video-based interventions for individuals with autism: Key questions that remain unanswered. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2008.09.001
32.
*ReagonK. A.HigbeeT. S.EndicottK. (2007). Using video instruction procedures with and without embedded text to teach object labeling to preschoolers with autism: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22, 13–20.
33.
*SanchoK.SidenerT. M.ReeveS. A.SidenerD. W. (2010). Two variations of video modeling interventions for teaching play skills to children with autism. Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 421–442.
34.
*Sani-BozkurtS.OzenA. (2015). Effectiveness and efficiency of peer and adult models used in video modeling in teaching pretend play skills to children with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 71–83.
35.
ScottJ.BennettK. D. (2012). Applied behavior analysis and learners with autism spectrum disorders. In ZagerD.WehmeyerM. L.SimpsonR. L. (Eds.), Educating students with autism spectrum disorders: Research-based principles and practices (pp. 63–81). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
*ShererM.PierceK. L.ParedesS.KisackyK. L.IngersollB.SchreibmanL. (2001). Enhancing conversation skills in children with autism via video technology: Which is better, “self” or “other” as a model?Behavior Modification, 25, 140–158.
37.
*SmithM.AyresK. M.MechlingL. C.SmithK. (2013). Comparison of the effects of video modeling with narration vs. video modeling on the functional skill acquisition of adolescents with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 164–178.
38.
SparapaniN.MorganL.ReinhardtV. P.SchatschneiderC.WetherbyA. M. (2016). Evaluation of classroom active engagement in elementary students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 782–796. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2615-2
39.
*SpencerG. P.MechlingL. C.IveyA. N. (2015). Comparison of three video perspectives when using video prompting by students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 330–342.
40.
*Taber-DoughtyT.PattonS. E.BrennanS. (2008). Simultaneous and delayed video modeling: An examination of system effectiveness and student preferences. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23, 1–18.
41.
*Van LaarhovenT.ZuritaL. M.JohnsonJ. W.GriderK. M.GriderK. L. (2009). Comparison of self, other, and subjective video models for teaching daily living skills to individuals with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 44, 509–522.
42.
WoleryM.LaneK. L. (2014). Literature reviews, research proposals, and final reports. In GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 50–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
