The Effectiveness of Using a Content Acquisition Podcast to Teach Phonological Awareness,Phonemic Awareness,and Phonics to Preservice Special Education Teachers

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of using a content acquisition podcast (CAP) to teach phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and phonics (PA) to preservice special education teachers. Fifty undergraduate preservice special education teachers over 2 years were randomly assigned to either the CAP group or a comparison group during a semester-long course on language development. The CAP group watched a 10-min CAP on PA, and the comparison group read a practitioner-friendly article. As part of the course, both groups were instructed to complete a required textbook chapter reading before class and received an expert guest lecture on these topics following the experimental conditions. There were no pretest differences between groups, years, or between students who completed the required textbook reading and those who did not. Results indicated that the CAP group significantly outperformed the comparison group on declarative knowledge and application items in PA and grew in their learning at a faster rate. CAPs offer an effective and efficient method for teaching PA and, in this study, were more effective at teaching PA and at helping students apply that knowledge than reading alone.

Keywords

college/university age/grade level preservice teachers professional development CAI technology perspectives

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anthony

Lonigan

(2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four students of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43–55. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.43

Bos

Mather

Dickson

Podhajski

Chard

(2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and in-service educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 97–120. doi:10.1007/s11881-001-0007-0

Byrne

Fielding-Barnsley

(1995). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 488–503. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.488

Chard

D. J.

Dickson

S. V.

(1999). Phonological awareness instructional and assessment guidelines. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 261–270. doi:10.1177/105345129903400502

Clark

R. E.

(2009). Translating research into new instructional technologies for higher education: The active ingredient process. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 4–18. doi:10.1007/s12528-009-9013-8

Clark

R. C.

Mayer

R. E.

(2008). Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement, 47, 5–13.

Cohen

(1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Connor

C. M.

Alberto

P. A.

Compton

D. L.

O’Connor

R. E.

(2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers. Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Dede

Jass Ketelhut

Whitehouse

Breit

McCloskey

E. M.

(2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 8–19. doi:10.1177/0022487108327554

10.

de Graaff

Bosman

A. M.

Hasselman

Verhoeven

(2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 318–333. doi:10.1080/10888430903001308

11.

Dickinson

D. K.

Golinkoff

R. M.

Hirsh-Pasek

(2010). Speaking out for language: Why language is central to reading development. Educational Researcher, 39, 305–310. doi:10.3102/0013189X10370204

12.

Dieker

L. A.

Kennedy

M. J.

Smith

Vasquez

III Rock

Thomas

C. N.

(2014). Use of technology in the preparation of pre-service teachers (Document No. IC-11). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/

13.

Dong

Maynard

(2013). PowerUP!: A tool for calculating minimum detectable effect sizes and minimum required sample sizes for experimental and quasi-experimental design studies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 24–67. doi:10.1080/19345747.2012.673143

14.

Driver

M. K.

Pullen

P. C.

Kennedy

M. J.

Williams

M. C.

Ely

(2014). Using instructional technology to improve preservice teachers’ knowledge of phonological awareness. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 37, 309–329. doi:10.1177/0888406414537902

15.

Dunst

C. J.

Valentine

Raab

Hamby

D. W.

(2013). Relationship between child participation in everyday activities and early literacy and language development. CeLL Reviews, 6, 1–16.

16.

Ely

Kennedy

M. J.

Pullen

Williams

M. C.

Hirsch

S. E.

(2014). Improving instruction of future teachers: A multimedia approach that supports implementation of evidence-based vocabulary practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 35–43. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.012

17.

Flanigan

(2007). A concept of word in text: A pivotal event in early reading acquisition. Journal of Literacy Research, 39, 37–70. doi:10.1080/10862960709336757

18.

Foorman

B. R.

Chen

D.-T.

Carlson

Moats

Francis

D. J.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 289–324.

19.

Foorman

B. R.

Schatschneider

(2003). Measurement of teaching practices during reading/language arts instruction and its relationship to student achievement. In Vaughn

Briggs

K. L.

(Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 1–30). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

20.

Gatewood

(2008). Podcasting: Just the basics. Kappa delta Pi Record, 44, 90–93.doi:10.1080/00228958.2008.10516502

21.

George

Mallery

(2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

22.

Gillon

G. T.

(2006). Phonological awareness intervention: A preventive framework for preschool children with specific speech and language impairments. In McCauley

R. J.

Fey

M. E.

(Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 279–307). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

23.

Grossman

(2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In Cochran-Smith

Zeichner

K. M.

(Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 425–476). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

24.

Hart

J. E.

C. M.

(2013). Investigating the impact of technology on pre-service teacher knowledge of autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 504–513.

25.

Hirsch

S. E.

Kennedy

M. J.

Haines

S. J.

Thomas

C. N.

Alves

K. A.

(2015). Improving preservice teachers’ knowledge and application of functional behavioral assessments using multimedia. Behavior Disorders, 41, 38–50.

26.

Hobson

E. H.

(2004). Getting students to read: Fourteen tips. Idea Paper, 40, 1–10.

27.

Joshi

R. M.

Binks

Hougen

Dahlgren

M. E.

Ocker-Dean

Smith

D. L.

(2009). Why elementary teachers might be inadequately prepared to teach reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 392–402. doi:10.1177/0022219409338736

28.

Joyce

Showers

(2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ACSD.

29.

Kennedy

M. J.

(2011). Effects of content acquisition podcasts on vocabulary performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.

30.

Kennedy

M. J.

Deshler

D. D.

Lloyd

J. W.

(2015). Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 22–38. doi:10.1177/0022219413487406

31.

Kennedy

M. J.

Driver

M. K.

Pullen

P. C.

Ely

Cole

M. T.

(2013). Improving teacher candidates’ knowledge of phonological awareness: A multimedia approach. Computers & Education, 64, 42–51. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.010

32.

Kennedy

M. J.

Hart

J. E.

Kellems

R. O.

(2010). Using enhanced podcasts to augment limited instructional time in teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 34, 87–105. doi:10.1177/0888406410376203

33.

Kennedy

M. J.

Hirsch

S. E.

Dillon

S. E.

Rabideau

Alves

K. D.

Driver

M. K.

(2016). Using content acquisition podcasts to increase student knowledge and to reduce perceived cognitive load. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 153–158.

34.

Kennedy

M. J.

Kellems

R. O.

Thomas

C. N.

Newton

J. R.

(2015). Using content acquisition podcasts to deliver core content to preservice teacher candidates. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 163–168.

35.

Kennedy

M. J.

Newton

J. R.

Haines

Walther-Thomas

Kellems

R. O.

(2012).A triarchic model for teaching “introduction to special education”: Case studies, content acquisition podcasts, and effective feedback. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20, 251–275.

36.

Kennedy

M. J.

Thomas

C. N.

(2012). Effects of content acquisition podcasts to develop preservice teachers’ knowledge of positive behavioral interventions and supports. Exceptionality, 20, 1–19. doi:10.1080/09362835.2011.611088

37.

Kennedy

M. J.

Thomas

C. N.

Aronin

Newton

J. R.

Lloyd

J. W.

(2014a). Improving teacher candidate knowledge using content acquisition podcasts. Computers & Education, 70, 116–127. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.010

38.

Kennedy

M. J.

Thomas

C. N.

Meyer

J. P.

Alves

K. D.

Lloyd

J. W.

(2014b). Using evidence-based multimedia to improve vocabulary performance of adolescents with LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 71–86. doi:10.1177/0731948713507262

39.

Kuder

S. J.

(2013). Teaching students with language and communication disabilities (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

40.

Lambert

(2012). Twilight of the lecture. Harvard Magazine, pp. 23–27.

41.

Lonn

Teasley

S. D.

(2009). Podcasting in higher education: What are the implications for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 88–92. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.002

42.

Mayer

R. E.

(2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

43.

Mayer

R. E.

(2011). Applying the science of learning. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

44.

McCathren

R. B.

Allor

J. H.

(2002). Using storybooks with preschool children: Enhancing language and emergent literacy. Young Exceptional Children, 5, 3–10. doi:10.1177/109625060200500401

45.

McCutchen

Abbott

R. D.

Green

L. B.

Beretvas

S. N.

Cox

Potter

N. S.

… Gray

A. L.

(2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86. doi:10.1177/002221940203500106

46.

Means

Toyama

Murphy

Baki

(2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47.

47.

Moats

L. C.

(1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102. doi:10.1007/bf02648156

48.

Moats

L. C.

(1999). Teaching reading is rocket science. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.

49.

Moats

L. C.

Foorman

B. R.

(2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23–45. doi:10.1007/s11881-003-0003-7

50.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. doi:10.1037/e313902005-001

51.

National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy. Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. doi:10.1037/e563852009-001

52.

National Institute for Literacy. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy at EDPubs.

53.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the Transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41, 428–442. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.428

54.

Paciga

K. A.

Hoffman

J. L.

Teale

W. H.

(2011). The national early literacy panel and preschool literacy instruction. Young Children, 51, 50.

55.

Podhajski

Mather

Nathan

Sammons

(2009). Professional development in scientifically based reading instruction teacher knowledge and reading outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 403–417. doi:10.1177/0022219409338737

56.

Pullen

P. C.

(2004). Effective practices for phonological awareness. TeachingLD HotSheet, 2. Retrieved from http://s3.amazonaws.com/cmi-teaching-ld/alerts/5/uploaded_files/original_alert14.pdf?1301000591

57.

Richardson

J. T. E.

(2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001

58.

Ritchey

K. D.

(2011). The first “R”: Evidence-based reading instruction for students with learning disabilities. Theory Into Practice, 50, 28–34. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.534928

59.

Sayeski

K. L.

Kennedy

M. J.

de Irala

Clinton

Hamel

Thomas

(2015). The efficacy of multimedia modules for teaching basic literacy-related concepts. Exceptionality, 23, 237–257.

60.

Schwartz

D. L.

Bransford

J. D.

(1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–5223. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4

61.

Seery

M. K.

(2010). Pre-lecture resources to reduce in-lecture cognitive load. (Teaching Fellowships Paper 19.). Dublin, Republic of Ireland: Dublin Institute of Technology, Learning, Teaching & Technology Centre.

62.

Shulman

(1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23.

63.

Stuebing

K. K.

Barth

A. E.

Cirino

P. T.

Francis

D. J.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2008). A response to recent reanalyses of the National Reading Panel report: Effects of systematic phonics instruction are practically significant. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 123. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.123

64.

Vaughn

Wanzek

(2014). Intensive interventions in reading for students with reading disabilities: Meaningful impacts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 46–53. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12031

65.

Walsh

Glaser

Wilcox

D. D.

(2006). What education schools aren’t teaching about reading and what elementary teachers aren’t learning. National Council on Teacher Quality. Retreived from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506642.pdf

66.

Washburn

E. K.

Joshi

R. M.

Cantrell

E. B.

(2011). Are preservice teachers prepared to teach struggling readers? Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 21–43. doi:10.1007/s11881-010-0040-y