Reports of the experiences of 256 early intervention and early childhood providers with assistive technology (AT) reuse were obtained via a national online survey. A majority of providers (75.7%) indicated that they had never donated, sold, or received a device from a formal AT reuse program. However, a majority did report reusing AT devices within their own programs, indicating that reuse was occurring at a program-based level. Limitations of program-based reuse are discussed and suggestions are made for expanding the capacity and usability of reuse through affiliations with statewide and regional networks. In addition, respondent data suggest an expansion of AT reuse beyond devices, to include ideas and instructions for low-tech solutions to meet the needs of younger children in particular.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Assistive Technology Reauthorization Act of 2004, P.L. 108-364, 29 U. S. C. §§ 3001 et seq.
2.
Bean-KampwerthL.PersuadL. (2011, January). Using the IQ-ATR to improve your reuse program. In ZabalaJ. (Chair), AT reuse strand presentations. Symposium conducted at Assistive Technology Industry Association National Conference, Orlando, FL.
3.
CampbellP. H.MilbourneS.WilcoxM. J. (2008). Adaptation interventions to promote participation in natural settings. Infants and Young Children, 21, 94–106.
4.
CampbellP. H.WilcoxM. J. (2012). Assistive technology for young children with disabilities. In MuccioL., Ed., Spotlight on Young Children and Technology. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
5.
CardonT. A.WilcoxM. J.CampbellP. H. (2011). Caregiver perspectives about assistive technology use with their young children with autism spectrum disorders. Infants & Young Children, 24, 153–173. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0b013e31820eae40
6.
DuganL. M.CampbellP. H.WilcoxM. J. (2006). Making decisions about assistive technology with infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26, 25–32.
7.
DuplantisA. (2009, September). Use, non-use, and satisfaction with assistive technology provided by a reutilization program. Return on Investment, Budget Development and Measuring AT Reuse Outcomes. Symposium conducted at the National AT Reuse Conference, Atlanta, GA.
8.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004. P. L. 108-446, 20 U. S. C. §§ 1400 et seq.
9.
KlingA.CampbellP. H.WilcoxJ. (2010). Young children with physical disabilities: Caregiver perspectives about assistive technology. Infants & Young Children, 23, 169–183.
10.
KniskernJ.PhillipsC. P.PattersonT. (2008). Technology (AT) reutilization (reuse): What we know today. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 5, 59–71.
11.
KniskernJ.PhillipsC.PersaudL.RoystonK. (2012, January). Filling the gap! AT reuse helps school and community transitions. In ZabalaJ. (Chair), AT reuse strand presentations. Symposium conducted at Assistive Technology Industry Association National Conference, Orlando, FL.
12.
LahmE. A.SizemoreL. (2002). Factors that influence assistive technology decision making. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(1), 15–26.
13.
MistrettS. (2004). Assistive technology helps young children with disabilities participate in daily activities. Technology in Action, 1(4), 1–8.
14.
MurchlandS.ParkynH. (2010). Using assistive technology for schoolwork: The experience of children with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 5, 438–447. doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.481773
15.
ParetteP.SchererM. (2004). Assistive technology use and stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 217–226.
PhillipsC.PersaudL.AldermanS. (2012, January). Optimizing AT resources in schools: School swap and more. In ZabalaJ. (Chair), AT reuse strand presentations. Symposium conducted at Assistive Technology Industry Association National Conference, Orlando, FL.
18.
RESNA (Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technolog y). (2000). Discovering hidden resources: Assistive technology recycling, refurbishing, and redistribution. RESNA Technical Assistance Project. Retrieved from http://www.resnaprojects.org/nattap/library/pubs/recycling/RMtotal.htm.
19.
WallaceJ. (2011). Assistive technology funding in the United States. NeuroRehabilitation, 28, 295–302. doi: 10.3233/NRE20110657
