This article describes the challenges in organizing professional learning communities (PLCs) in special education, identifies the teacher and student benefits of using a PLC approach to professional development, and discusses the promise and pitfalls of organizing web-based PLCs to engage distributed stakeholders in the practice of special education. The author used two Web 2.0 applications, a wiki and a Ning, to provide the infrastructure and support community-building efforts. Although the PLC membership has grown to about 200 members during the past four years, data collected via Web 2.0 show that most of the members participate as observers only, relying almost entirely on the network administrator to direct and manage all facets of community work. The development of web-based PLCs to support the practice of special education may be dependent upon the building of school-based leadership in addition to the meaningful participation of school administrators and teacher educators in community work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarabS. A.MakinsterJ. G.SchecklerR. (2003). Designing system dualities: Characterizing a Web-supported professional development community. The Information Society, 19, 237–256.
2.
BausmithJ. M.BarryC. (2011). Revisiting professional learning communities to increase college readiness: The importance of pedagogical knowledge. Educational Researcher, 40(4), 175–178.
3.
BayM. B.Parker-KatzM. (2009). Perspectives on induction of beginning special educators. Research summary, key program features, and the state of state-level policies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(1), 17–32.
4.
BillingsleyB. S. (2004). Promoting teacher quality and retention in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(5), 370–376.
5.
BlantonL. P.SindelarP. T.CorreaV. I. (2006). Models and measures of beginning teacher quality. The Journal of Special Education, 40(2), pp. 115–117.
6.
BoeE. E.CookL. H. (2006). The chronic and increasing shortage of fully certified teachers in special and general education. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 443–460.
7.
BosC. S.VaughnS. (2006). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (6th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
8.
BoyerL. (2005). Supporting the induction of special educators. Program descriptions of university-school district partnerships. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(3).
9.
BrownellM. T.RosenbergM. S.SindelarP. T.SmithD. D. (2004). Teacher education: Toward a qualified teacher for every classroom. In SorrelsA. M.RiethH. J.SindelarP. T. (Eds.). Critical issues in special education (pp. 243–257). Boston, MA: Pearson.
10.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.BishopA. G.LangleyL. K.SeoS. (2002). Special education teacher supply and teacher quality: The problems, the solutions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35(2), 1–16.
11.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KieleyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357–377.
12.
CarnineD. (1997). Bridging the research-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 513–521.
13.
CarrS. C.EvansE. D. (2006). Helping beginning teachers remain in the profession: A successful induction program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(2), 113–115.
14.
CondermanG.MorinJ.StephensJ. T. (2005). Special education student teaching practices. Preventing School Failure, 49(3) 5–10.
15.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.CookL.LandrumT. (2008). Evidence-based practices in special education: Some practical considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(2) 69–75.
16.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.Harjusola-WebbS. (2008). Evidence-based special education and professional wisdom: Putting it all together. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(2) 105–111.
17.
Darling-HammondL.McLaughlinM. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.
18.
DoppeltY.SchunnC. D.SilkE. M.MehalikM. M.ReynoldsB.WardE. (2009). Evaluating the impact of a facilitated learning community approach to professional development on teacher practice and student achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education27(3), 339–354.
EpanchinB. C.ColucciK. (2002). The professional development school without walls: A partnership between a university and two school districts. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 349–358.
22.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. 2 0 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99 (1974),
23.
FarrellP.AinscowM. (2002). Making special education inclusive. New York, NY: David Fulton.
24.
FriendM.BursuckW. (2011). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (6th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
25.
FriendM. (2006). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals, IDEA 2004 update edition. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
GallM. D.GallJ. P.BorgW. R. (2007). Educational research. An introduction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
HardmanE. L. (2011). Building professional learning communities in special education through social networking: Directions for future research. Journal on School Educational Technology, 7(2), 30–38.
28.
HardmanE. L. (2010). Building a web-based community of practice. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 14(4) 128–132.
29.
JohnsonC. C.FargoJ. D. (2010). Urban school reform enabled by transformative professional development: Impact on teacher change and student learning of science. Urban Education, 45(1), 4–29.
30.
JonesM. L. (2009). A study of novice special educators' views of evidence-based practices. Teacher Education and Special Education32, 101–120.
31.
KozleskiE.MainzerR.DeshlerD. (2000). Bright futures for exceptional learners. An agenda to achieve quality conditions for teaching and learning. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 451668)
32.
LandrumT. J.CookB. G.TankersleyM.FitzgeraldS. (2002). Teacher perceptions of the trustworthiness, usability, and accessibility of information from different sources. Remedial and Special Education23(1), 42–48.
33.
LenzK. B.DeshlerD. D. (2004). Teaching content to all. Evidence-based inclusive practices in middle and secondary schools. New York, NY: Pearson.
34.
LenzK. B.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D.BealsV. L. (2007). The word identification strategy. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
35.
LittleM. E.KingL. M. (2008). Using online modules to bridge research to practice in classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 208–223.
36.
McLaughlinM. W.TalbertJ. E. (2006). Building school based teacher learning communities. Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L. (2000). Inclusive schools in action. Making differences ordinary. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
38.
National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2008). Professional standards for the accreditation of teacher preparation institutions. Washington, D.C.: Author.
39.
Ning, Inc. (2012). NING [social networking software]. Retrieved from http://www.ning.com/.
40.
O'SheaD. J.HammitteD.MainzerR.CrutchfieldM. D. (2000). From teacher preparation to continuing professional development. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23(2), 71–77.
41.
O'SheaD. J.O'SheaL. J. (1997). Collaboration and school reform: A twenty-first century perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(4), 449–462.
42.
PBWiki, Inc. (2012). PBworks [wiki software]. Retrieved from http://pbworks.com/.
43.
PraterM. A.SileoT. W. (2004). Fieldwork requirements in special education preparation. A national study. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(3), 251–263.
44.
PraterM. A.SelioT. W. (2002). School and university partnerships in special education field experiences: A national descriptive study. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 325–355
45.
SalendS. J. (2005). Creating inclusive classrooms. Effective and reflective practices for all students (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
46.
SchlagerM. S.FuscoJ. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse?The Information Society, 19, 203–220.
47.
SchrumL. M.LevinB. B. (2009). Leading 21st century schools: Harnessing technology for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
48.
SindelarP. T.BrownellM. T.BillingsleyB. (2010). Special education teacher research: Current status and future directions. Teacher Education in Special Education, 33(1), 8–24.
49.
SmithT. M.IngersollR. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681.
50.
SmithT. E. C.PollowayE.PattonJ. R.DowdyC. A. (2004). Teaching students with special needs in inclusive settings (4th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
51.
University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning. (2012). Strategic instruction model (SIM). Retrieved from http://kucrl.org/sim/.
52.
VaughnS.BosC. S.SchummJ. S. (2007). Teaching exceptional, diverse, and at-risk students in the general education classroom (4th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
