The purpose of this review was to examine the degree to which augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention research included students with disabilities and their peers as part of the intervention. Given the shift in the field toward a social-ecological framework of disability, incorporating natural communication partners into interventions and systems of supports for communication and social relationships is increasingly important to promote valued outcomes, including meaningful friendships and social networks between students with disabilities and their peers. Thirteen empirical studies were identified that included students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) who used AAC and their peers. These studies were grouped according to their focus on the target student with a disability, the peer, or the dyad. Directions for future research and practice from a social-ecological framework are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
* Indicates studies included in the review
2.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Technical report. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy.
3.
Assistive Technology Act, 29 U.S.C. § 3 (2004).
4.
BeckA.FritzH.KellerA.DennisM. (2000). Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 13–26.
5.
*BeckA. R.Fritz-VerticchioH. (2003). The influence of information and role-playing experiences on children's attitudes towards peers who use AAC. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 51–60.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BronfenbrennerU. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.
8.
BukowskiW. M.HozaB. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In BerndT. J.LaddG. W. (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 15–45). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
*BuzolichM.KingJ.BaroodyS. (1991). Acquisition of the commenting function among system users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 88–99.
10.
CarterE.HughesC. (2005). Increasing social interaction among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers: Effective interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 179–193.
11.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2007). Social interaction interventions: Promoting socially supportive environments and teaching new skills. In OdomS. L.HornerR. H.SnellM. E.BlacherJ. (Eds.), Handbook on developmental disabilities (pp. 310–329). New York: The Guilford Press.
12.
*CarterM.MaxwellK. (1998). Promoting interaction with children using augmentative communication through a peer-directed intervention. International Journal of Disability Development, 45, 75–96.
13.
CookA. M.PolgarJ. M. (2007). Cook and Hussey's assistive technologies: Principles and practice. Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby.
14.
DamonW.PhelpsE. (1989). Strategic uses of peer learning in children's education. In BerndtT. J.LaddG. W. (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp.135–157). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
DanforthS.GabelS. L. (2006). Vital questions facing disability studies in education. New York: Peter Lang.
16.
DowningJ. (2005). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
17.
*Garrison-HarrellL.KampsD.KravitsT. (1997). The effects of peer networks on social-communicative behaviors for students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 241–235.
18.
GlennenS. L.DeCosteD. C. (1997). Handbook on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. San Diego, CA: Singular.
19.
HalleJ. W.BaerD. M.SpradlinJ. E. (1981). Teachers' generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 389–409.
20.
HartupW. W. (1979). The social worlds of childhood. American Psychologist, 34, 944–950.
21.
HughesC.HarmerM. L.KillianD. J.NiarhosF. (1995). The effects of multiple-exemplar self-instructional training on high school students' generalized conversational interaction intervention. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 493–509.
22.
*HughesC.RungL. L.WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.CopelandS. R.HwangB. (2000). Self-prompted communication book use to increase social interaction among high school students. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25(3), 153–166.
23.
*HuntP.AlwellM.Farron-DavisF.GoetzL. (1996). Creating socially supportive environments for fully included students who experience multiple disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 53–71.
24.
HuntP.AlwellM.GoetzL. (1988). Acquisition of conversation skills and the reduction of appropriate social interaction behaviors. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13(1), 20–27.
25.
*HuntP.AlwellM.GoetzL. (1991a). Establishing conversational exchanges with family and friends: Moving from training to meaningful communication. Journal of Special Education, 25, 305–319.
26.
*HuntP.AlwellM.GoetzL. (1991b). Interacting with peers through conversation turn taking with a communication book adaptation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7(2), 117–126.
*JohnstonS. S.McDonnellA. P.NelsonC.MagnavatoA. (2003). Teaching functional communication skills using augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 263–280.
29.
Kent-WalshJ.McNaughtonD. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 195–204.
30.
LaddG. W. (1989). Toward a further understanding of peer relationships and their contributions to children development. In BerndtT. J.LaddG. W. (Eds.), Peer Relationships in Child Development (pp. 1–11). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
31.
LuckassonR.Borthwick-DuffyS.BuntixW. H. E.CoulterD. L.CraigE. P. M.ReeveA. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
32.
National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Persons with Severe Disabilities. (1992). Guidelines for meeting the communication needs of persons with severe disabilities. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy or www.asha.org/njc.
33.
*NelsonC.McDonnellA.JohnstonS.CromptonA.NelsonA. (2007). Keys to play: A strategy to increase the social interactions of young children with autism and their typically developing peers. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 165–181.
34.
ParkerJ. G.GottmanJ. M. (1989). Social and emotional development in a relational context: Friendship interaction from early childhood to adolescence. In BerndtT. J.LaddG. W. (Eds.), Peer Relationships in Child Development (pp. 95–131). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
PriceJ. M.DodgeK. A. (1989). Peers' Contributions to Children's Social Maladjustment. In BerndtT. J.LaddG. M. (Eds.), Peer Relationships in Child Development (pp. 341–370). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
36.
RatcliffA. E.CressC. J. (1999). Guidelines for enhancing reciprocal peer communication with adolescents who use augmentative/alternative communication. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 20, 25–35.
37.
ShogrenK. A.BradleyV.GomezS. C.YeagerM. H.SchalockR. L. (2009). Public policy and the enhancement of desired outcomes for persons with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 307–319.
38.
*ShuklaS.KennedyC.CushingL. (1999). Intermediate school students with severe disabilities: Supporting their social participation in general education classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 130–140.
39.
SnellM. E.BrownF. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
40.
SnellM. E.ChenL.HooverK. (2006). Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of intervention research 1997–2003. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(3), 203–214.
41.
ThompsonJ. R.WehmeyerM. L.HughesC. (2010). Mind the gap! Implications of a person-environment fit model of intellectual disability for students, educators, and schools. Exceptionality. (Special issues: Support needs assessment and planning for children and adults with intellectual disabilities). 18, 168–181.
42.
*TrembathD.BalandinS.TogherL.StancliffeR.J. (2009). Peer-mediated teaching and augmentative and alternative communication for preschool-aged children with autism. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34, 173–186.
43.
*TrottierN.KampL.MirendaP. (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 26–39.
44.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
