AgerA. (1986). Performance contoured programming: A structure for microcomputer-based teaching of individuals with severe learning difficulties. Journal of the Association for Programmed Learning, 23(2), 130–135.
2.
AndersonK.AndersonC. (2005). Integrating technology in standards-based instruction. In EdyburnD. L.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.). Handbook of special education technology research and practice, pp. 521–544. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design Publications.
3.
BooneR.HigginsK. (2005). Designing digital materials for students with disabilities. In EdyburnD. L.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.). Handbook of special education technology research and practice, pp. 481–492. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design Publications.
4.
BooneR.HigginsK. (2007). The role of instructional design in assistive technology research and development. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 135–140.
5.
ClarkR. C.MayerR. E. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
6.
CooperA. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.
7.
CrockerL.AlginaJ. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
8.
GeisertP. G.FutrellM. K. (1995). Teachers, computers, and curriculum. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
GoldenD. C. (2002). Instructional software accessibility: A status report. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(1), 57–60.
10.
HigginsK.BooneR. (2006, January). Evaluating educational software for use by students with disabilities in special and general education. Paper presented at the 2006 Hawaii International Conference on Education, Honolulu.
11.
HigginsK.BooneR.WilliamsD. (2000). Evaluating educational software for special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(2), 109–115.
12.
LarsenS. (1995). What is “quality” in the use of technology for children with learning disabilities?Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 18(2), 118–130.
13.
LewisR. (2005). Classroom technology for students with learning disabilities. In EdyburnD. L.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.). Handbook of special education technology research and practice, pp. 325–334. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design Publications.
14.
LockardJ.AbramsP. D.ManyW. A. (1997). Microcomputers for twenty-first century educators. New York, NY: Longman.
15.
MontaliJ.LewandowskiL. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 271–279.
16.
NeumanD. (1991). Learning disabled students' interactions with commercial courseware: A naturalistic study. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 39(1), 31–49.
17.
OkoloC. (2005). Interactive technologies and social studies instruction for students with mild disabilities. In EdyburnD. L.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.). Handbook of special education technology research and practice, pp. 623–641. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design Publications.
18.
RoseD.MeyerA. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19.
SmithP. L.RaganT. J. (1999). Instructional design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
20.
WepnerS. (1990). Computers, reading software, and at-risk eighth graders. Journal of Reading, 34(4), 264–268.
21.
WilliamsD.BooneR.KingsleyK. (2004). Teacher beliefs about educational software: A Delphi study. Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 36(3), 213–229.
22.
WorthenB. R.BorgW. R.WhiteK. R. (1993). Measurement and evaluation in the schools. New York, NY: Longman.
23.
ZaneT.FrazerC. G. (1992). The extent to which software developers validate their claims. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 410–419.