Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Anecdotal reports suggest that individuals with developmental disabilities who lack speech may be enabled to communicate through the use of a new iPod-based communication device. However, there appear to be limited empirical data demonstrating successful use of this new device by such individuals. This study was designed to provide empirical evidence on acquisition and functional use of an iPod-based communication device. Three individuals with developmental disabilities participated in baseline, acquisition-training, post-training, and follow-up phases that were staggered in a multiple-probe across participants design. Acquisition-training focused on teaching participants to request snacks, or snacks and toys, by selecting graphic symbols on an iPod Touch® with Proloquo2Go™ software. Graduated guidance, time delay, and differential reinforcement procedures were successful in teaching functional use of the iPod-based system to two of the three participants. These preliminary results support the use of this new iPod-based communication system for some individuals with developmental disabilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blischak

D. M.

Lombardino

L. J.

Dyson

A. T.

(2003). Use of speech-generating devices: In support of natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 29–35.

Duker

Didden

Sigafoos

(2004). One-to-one training: Instructional procedures for learners with developmental disabilities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Gregory

M. K.

DeLeon

I. G.

Richman

D. M.

(2009). The influence of matching and motor-imitation abilities on rapid acquisition of manual signs and exchange-based communication responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 399–404.

Kagohara

D. M.

van der Meer

Achmadi

Green

V. A.

O'Reilly

M. F.

Mulloy

B. A.

Lancioni

G.E.

Lang

Sigafoos

(2010). Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9, 328–338.

Kennedy

C. H.

(2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Lancioni

G. E.

O'Reilly

M. F.

Cuvo

A. J.

Singh

N. N.

Sigafoos

Didden

(2007). PECS and VOCA to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488.

Mirenda

(2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.

Mirenda

(2009). Promising interventions in AAC for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 112–113.

Reichle

York

Sigafoos

(1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

10.

Rispoli

Franco

van der Meer

Lang

Camargo

S. P. H.

(2010). The use of speech-generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 276–293.

11.

Romski

M. A.

Sevcik

R. A.

(1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 281–285.

12.

Romski

M. A.

Sevcik

R. A.

(1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

13.

Schlosser

R. W.

Blischak

D.M.

(2001). Is there a role for speech output in interventions for persons with autism? A review. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 170–178.

14.

Schlosser

R. W.

Sigafoos

Koul

R. K.

(2009). Speech output and speech-generating devices in autism spectrum disorders. In Mirenda

Iacono

(Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders and AAC (pp. 141–169). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

15.

Sennott

Bowker

(2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145.

16.

Sigafoos

Didden

O'Reilly

(2003). Effects of speech output on maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizations in three children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 37–47.

17.

Sparrow

S. S.

Cicchetti

D. V.

Balla

D. A.

(2005). Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.

18.

Sutherland

Sigafoos

Schlosser

R. W.

O'Reilly

M. F.

Lancioni

G. E.

(2010). Are speech-generating devices viable AAC options for adults with intellectual disabilities? In Mullennix

Stern

(Eds.), Computer synthesized speech technologies: Tools for aiding impairment (pp. 161–176). Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference.

19.

van der Meer

Rispoli

(2010). Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 294–306.

Teaching Functional Use of an iPod-Based Speech-Generating Device to Individuals with Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References