The researchers examined the use of video modeling by means of a handheld computer as an alternative instructional delivery system for learning basic geometry skills. Three high school students with learning disabilities participated in this study. Through video modeling, teacher-developed video clips showing step-by-step problem solving processes were synched into handheld computers. Students were shown how to use a handheld computer and access teacher-developed video clips regarding how to successfully solve geometry problems. All three participants acquired and maintained the geometry skills taught. The results are discussed in the context of increased opportunities for students to watch, listen, and interact with content information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsG.EnglemannS. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
2.
BahrC. M.RiethH. J. (1989). The effects of instructional computer games and drill and practice software on learning disabled students' mathematics achievement. Computers in the Schools, 6 (3/4), 87–101.
3.
BarlowD. H.HersenM. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BelliniS.AkullianJ. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, 264–287.
5.
BrianT.BayM.Lopez-ReynaN.DonahueM. (1991). Characteristics of students with learning disabilities: A summary of the extant data base and its implications for educational programs. In LloydJ. W.NirbhayN.ReppA. C. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 113–131). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
6.
Cannella-MaloneH.SigafoosJ.O'ReillyM.de la CruzB.EdrisinhaC.LancioniG. E. (2006). Comparing video prompting to video modeling for teaching daily living skills to six adults with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 344–356.
7.
CaseL. P.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (1992). Improving the mathematical problem-solving skills of students with learning disabilities: Self-regulated strategy development. Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 1–19.
8.
CawleyJ. F.MillerJ. H. (1989). Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of children with learning disabilities: Are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 250–259.
9.
CawleyJ. F.ParmarR.FoleyT. E.SalmonS.RoyS. (2001). Arithmetic performance of students: Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67, 311–328.
10.
CawleyJ. F.ParmarR.YanW. F.MillerJ. H. (1998). Arithmetic computation performance of students with learning disabilities: Implications for curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(2), 68–74.
11.
ChristensenC. A.GerberM. M. (1990). Effectiveness of computerized drill and practice games in teaching basic math facts. Exceptionality, 1, 149–165.
12.
CihakD.AlbertoP. A.Taber-DoughtyT.GamaR. (2006). A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulation strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21(2), 89–99.
13.
CihakD. F.KesslerK.AlbertoP. A. (2007). Generalized use of handheld prompting systems. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 397–408.
14.
CihakD. F.KesslerK.AlbertoP. A. (2008). Use of a handheld prompting system to transition independently through vocational tasks for students with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 102–110.
15.
ClareS. K.JensonW. R.KehleT. J.BrayM. A. (2000). Self-modeling as a treatment for increasing on-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 517–522.
16.
DorwickP. W. (1999). A review of self modeling and related interventions. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 23–39.
17.
FergusonH.Myles-SmithB.HagiwaraT. (2005). Using a personal digital assistant to enhance the independence of an adolescent with asperger syndrome. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 40, 60–67.
18.
GearyG. C. (2004). Mathematics and Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4–15.
19.
GreenwoodC. R.DelquadriJ. C.HallR. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 371–378.
20.
HiebertJ.CarpenterT. P.FennemaE.FusonK.HumanP.MurrayH. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21.
21.
HineJ. F.WoleryM. (2006). Using point-of-view video modeling to teach play to preschoolers with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(2), 83–93.
22.
HitchcockC. H.DorwickP.PraterM. A. (2003). Video self-modeling intervention in school-based settings. Remedial and Special Education, 24(1), 36–45, 56.
23.
HolmesS. R. R. (1991). The effect of verbal self-instructional training on the mathematical performance of fifth and sixth grade learning disabled children in a group compared to individualized instructions (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1709.
24.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
25.
HutchinsonN. L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16(1), 34–63.
26.
IvarieJ. J. (1986). Effects of proficiency rates on later performance of a recall and writing behavior. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 25–30.
27.
JitendraA. K.HoffK.BeckM. M. (1999). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to solve word problems using schema-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 50–64.
28.
KoscinskiS. T., (1995). Comparison of teacher-assisted and computer-assisted instruction using constant time delay to teach multiplication facts to students with mild learning disabilities. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 3810.
29.
MacciniP.MulcahyC. A.WilsonM. G. (2007). A follow-up of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 58–74.
30.
MacciniP.RuhlK. L. (2000). Effects of a graduated instructional sequence of algebraic subtraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 465–489.
31.
MechlingL. C.PridgenL. S.CroninB. A. (2005). Computer-based video instruction to teach students with intellectual disabilities to verbally respond to questions and make purchases in fast food restaurants. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(1), 47–59.
32.
MillerS. P.ButlerF. M.LeeK. (1998). Validated practices for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities: A review of literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(1), 1–24.
33.
NaglieriJ. A.GottlingS. H. (1995). A study of planning and mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities. Psychological Reports, 76, 1343–1354.
34.
NaglieriJ. A.GottlingS. H. (1997). Mathematics instruction and PASS cognitive processes: An intervention study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 513–520.
35.
NwaizuP. C. I. (1991). Using teacher-assisted and computer-assisted instruction to teach multiplication skills to youths with specific learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 3041.
36.
OkoloC. M. (1992a). The effect of computer-assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the arithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 3, 195–211.
37.
OkoloC. M. (1992b). The effect of computer-assisted instruction retaining on the attributions, persistence, and mathematics computation of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 327–334.
38.
PossellL. E.KehleT. J.McLoughlinC. S.BrayM. A. (1999). Self-modeling as an intervention to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 6, 99–105.
39.
RobinsonS. L.DePascaleC.RobertsF. C. (1989). Computer-delivered feedback in group-based instruction: Effects of learning disabled students in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5(1), 28–35.
40.
SchunkD.HansonA. R. (1989). Self-modeling and children's cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 155–163.
41.
Shipley-BenamouR.LutzkerJ.TaubmanM. (2002). Teaching daily living skills to children with autism through instructional video modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 165–175.
42.
SigafoosJ.O'ReillyM.CannellaH.UpadhyayaM.EdrisinhaC.LancioniG. E. (2005). Computer-presented video prompting for teaching microwave oven use to three adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 189–201.
43.
van't HooftM. A. H.DiazS. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers research hub: Year-end status report. Kent, OH: Kent State University.
WarnerM.AlleyG.SchumakerJ.DeslerD.ClarkF. (1980). A epidemiological study of learning disabled adolescents in secondary schools: Achievement and ability, socioeconomic status and school experiences (Report No. 13). Lawrence: University of Kansas, Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
46.
WilsonR.MajsterekD.SimmonsD. (1996). The effects of computer-assisted versus teacher-directed instruction on the multiplication performance of elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 382–390.
47.
WitzelB. S.MercerC. D.MillerM. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning disabilities: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 121–131.
48.
WoltersdorfM. A. (1992). Videotape self modeling in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 14(2), 53–73.
49.
WoodardJ.BaxterJ. (1997). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low-achieving students in inclusive settings. Exceptional Children, 63, 373–388.
50.
XinY. P.JitendraA. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 207–225.
