CITEd Staff. (2008). The role of technology in progress monitoring. Special Education Technology Practice, 10(2), 21–26.
2.
EdyburnD. L. (2009). Response to intervention: Is there a role for assistive technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 11(1), 15–19.
3.
EdyburnD. L. (2006). Failure is not an option: Collecting, reviewing, and acting on evidence for using technology to enhance academic performance. Learning and Leading with Technology, 34(1), 20–23.
4.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. (2007). Making differences ordinary in inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42, 162–168.
5.
MunkD. D. (2003). Solving the grading puzzle for students with disabilities. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
6.
ReevesD. B. (2004). The case against zero. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(4), 324–325.
7.
SuarezD. (2007). When students choose the challenge. Educational Leadership, 65(3), 60–65.
8.
WelchA. B. (2000). Responding to student concerns about fairness. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33, 36–40.
