Writing in a Multimedia Environment: Pilot Outcomes for High School Students in Special Education

Abstract

This study examined outcomes of using a generative multimedia environment for writing. Students in grades 9 to 12 enrolled in a special education language arts class participated in an eight-week intervention during which they wrote five stories that included pictures, audio, and text. Stories were scored using a Hawaii standards-based rubric assessment. Statistically significant differences were found when scores on the first and last stories were compared. Teams with lower pretest scores appeared to benefit the most from the intervention. A teacher interview revealed several affective outcomes in student writing behaviors, student engagement, and motivation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Accountability Resource Center Hawai'i (ARCH). (2005). School status and improvement report. Retrieved October 2, 2005 from http://arch.k12.hi.us/pdf/ssir/2004/Hawai'i/SSIR374–5.pdf.

Ayersman

D. J.

(1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 500–525.

Best

J. W.

Kahn

J. V.

(1998). Research in education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Brooks

J. G.

Brooks

M. G.

(1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Carlin-Menter

S. M.

Schuell

T. J.

(2003). Teaching writing strategies through multimedia authorship. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12, 315–334.

Center for Applied Special Technology. (n.d.). What is universal design for learning? Retrieved October 2, 2005, from http://www.cast.org/research/udl/index.html.

Creswell

J. W.

(2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daiute

Morse

(1994). Access to knowledge and expression: Multimedia writing tools for students with diverse needs and strengths. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(3), 221–256.

Dimitriadi

(2001). Evaluating the use of multimedia authoring with dyslexic learners: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 265–276.

10.

Dowrick

P. W.

Yuen

J. W. L.

(2006). Teenage literacy: Pilot study in Hawaii. Asia Pacific Journal of Inclusive Education, 3, 1–20.

11.

Dowrick

P. W.

Yuen

J. W. L.

(2007). Multimedia for literacy in English language learners with disabilities (Award # H327A070023). Washington, DC: U. S. Office of Special Education Programs.

12.

Fan

H. L.

Orey

(2001). Multimedia in the classroom: Its effect on student writing ability. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5), 16–24.

13.

Faux

(2005). Multimodality: How students with special educational needs create multimedia stories. Education, Communication and Information, 5, 167–181.

14.

Ferretti

R. P.

Okolo

C. M.

(1996). Authenticity in learning: Multimedia design projects in the social studies for students with. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 450–461.

15.

Harcourt (2005). Hawaii state assessment: Interpretive guide for reading and writing. (6th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.

16.

IntelliTools. (2003). IntelliPics Studio 3. Petaluma, CA: Author.

17.

Jeffs

Morrison

Messenheimer

Rizza

Banister

(2003). A retrospective analysis of technological advancements in special education. Computers in the Schools, 20(1–2), 129–152.

18.

Karlsen

Gardner

(1995). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (4th ed., SDRT-4). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

19.

Kazdin

A. E.

(1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

20.

Liu

(2004). Examining the performance and attitudes of sixth graders during their use of a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 357–379.

21.

MacArthur

Ferreti

Okolo

Cavalier

(2001). Technology applications for students with literacy problems: A critical review. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 273–301.

22.

Mertens

D. M.

(2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

23.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

24.

Williams

S. C.

(2002). How speech-feedback and word-prediction software can help students write. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(3), 72–79.

25.

Wissick

C. A.

(1996). Multimedia: Enhancing instruction for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 494–504.

26.

Yuen

J. W. L.

Dowrick

P. W.

Alaimaleata

E. T.

(2004). Full TLT2: Teen Literacy [and Math] through Technology, Community Technology Centers in Kalihi, Oahu, and American Samoa. Grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education, Federal Award ID# V341A040203. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

27.

Zhang

(2000). Technology and writing skills of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 467–479.