Anderson-InmanL.HorneyM. (1996/1997). Computer-based concept mapping: Enhancing literacy with tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 302–306.
2.
Anderson-InmanL.ZeitzL. (1993). Computer-based concept mapping: Active studying for active learners. The Computing Teacher, 21(1), 1–5.
3.
BiancarosaC.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
4.
BrownJ.FishcoV.HannaG. (1993). Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
5.
BSCS Biology: A human approach. (1997). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
6.
CastellaniJ.JeffsT. (2001). Emerging reading and writing strategies using technology. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(5), 60–67.
7.
Co:Writer [Computer software]. (2006). Volo, IL: Don Johnston.
8.
DemetriadisS.PapadopoulosP. M.StamelosI. G.FischerF. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students' context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning. Computers & Education, 51, 939–954.
9.
Draft:Builder [Computer software]. (2006). Volo, IL: Don Johnston.
10.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.WilliamsJ. P.BakerS. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.
11.
International Reading Association (IRA). (2006). Standards for middle and high school literacy coaches. Newark, DE: Author.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00–4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17.
PressleyM. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. III (pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Read:Outloud [Computer software]. (2006). Volo, IL: Don Johnston.
20.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: Center on Instruction, RMC Research Corporation.
21.
ShermanT.KurshanB. (2005). Constructing learning: Using technology to support teaching for understanding. Learning and Leading with Technology, 32(5), 10–13.
SOLO [Computer software]. (2007). Volo, IL: Don Johnston.
24.
TovaniC. (2000). I read it, but I don't get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
25.
Van den BroekP.KremerK. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend. In TaylorB.Van Den BroekP.GravesM. (Eds.), Reading for meaning (pp. 1–31). New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
WaxmanH. C.ConnellM. L.GrayJ. (2002). A quantitative synthesis of recent research on the effects of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
27.
WilmesB.Passmore-HowardA.Kohler-EvansP. (2008) Reving up the reluctant reader. Teaching Professor, 22(5), 5–5.
28.
Write:Outloud [Computer software]. (2006). Volo, IL: Don Johnston.