Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study used a modified multiple-baseline design to determine the effects on the writing performance of seven students with special needs when a talking word processor with spell checker software was used independent of and in conjunction with word prediction software as accommodations in daily writing exercises. Results indicated that, in general, the impact of using writing software was positive. The group mean for number of misspellings decreased, accuracy percentage increased, number of words increased, and overall district writing rubric scores increased. Further, the software had different benefits for different students and students expressed preferences for particular software functions. Implications for practice and research are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borgh

Dickson

W. P.

(1992). The effects on children's writing of adding speech synthesis to a word processor. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(4), 533–544.

Bridgeman

Cooper

(April, 1998) Comparability of scores on word-processed and handwritten essays on the graduate management admissions tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.

Brooks

Vaughan

Verninger

(1999). Tutorial interventions for writing disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(3), 183–190.

Co:Writer 4000. (2000). [Computer software]. Volo, Il: Don Johnston, Inc.

DeLaPaz

(1999). Composing via dictation and speech recognition systems: Compensatory technology for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 22(3), 173–182.

Edyburn

D. L.

(2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(9), 1–11.

MacArthur

C. A.

(1996). Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 344–354.

MacArthur

C. A.

(1999). Word prediction for students with severe spelling problems. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 22(3), 158–172.

MacArthur

C. A.

Graham

Haynes

J. B.

DeLaPaz

(1996). Spelling checkers and students with learning disabilities: Performance comparisons and impacts in spelling. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 35–57.

10.

Mayes

S. D.

Calhoun

S. L.

Crowell

E. W.

(2000). Learning disabilities and ADHD: Overlapping spectrum disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 417–424.

11.

Merbler

J. B.

Hadadian

Ulman

(1999). Using assistive technology in the inclusive classroom. Preventing School Failure, 43, 113–117.

12.

Montgomery

D. J.

Karlan

G. R.

Countinho

(2001). The effectiveness of word processor spell checker programs to produce target words for misspellings generated by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 27–41.

13.

Powers

(1994). Will they think less of my handwritten essay if others word process theirs? Effects on essay scores of intermingling handwritten and word-processed essays. Journal of Educational Management, 3, 220–233.

14.

Richards

S. B.

Taylor

R. L.

Ramsamy

Richards

R.Y.

(1999). Single subject research. Applications in educational and clinical settings. San Diego: Singular.

15.

Williams

S. C.

(2002). How speech-feedback and word-prediction software can help students write. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 72–78.

16.

Write:Outloud Version 3 (1993–1998). [Computer software]. Volo, IL: Don Johnston, Incorporated.

Using Software to Enhance the Writing Skills of Students with Special Needs

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References