Collaboration between special educators and general education teachers is associated with academic and social success of students with disabilities who are included in the general education classroom. This study reports the findings from 96 interviews conducted with special and general education teachers regarding collaboration strategies to provide assistive technology services to students. Strategies such as collaborative consultation, problem solving, and teaming are discussed, and interview findings are provided. The results are presented as four themes that emerged during interview analysis: (a) current teacher collaboration practices, (b) teacher-reported barriers to collaboration, (c) teacher suggestions to improve collaboration, and (d) reasons why teachers do not practice collaboration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BauschM. E.HasselbringT. S. (2004). Assistive technology: Are the necessary skills and knowledge being developed at the preservice and inservice levels?Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 97–104.
2.
BauschM. E.AultM. J.HasselbringT. S. (2006). Assistive technology planner: From IEP consideration to classroom implementation. Lexington, KY: National Assistive Technology Research Institute.
3.
BrownellM. T.YeagerE.RennellsM. S.RileyT. (1997). Teachers working together: What teacher educators and researchers should know. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 340–359.
4.
FriendM.CookL. (1990). Collaboration as a predictor for success in school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 69–86.
5.
GiangrecoM. F.PrelockP. A.ReidR. R.DennisR. E.EdelmanS. W. (2000). In VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education (2nd ed., pp. 360–388). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
HobbsT.WestlingD. L. (1998). Promoting successful inclusion through collaborative problem solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(1), 12–19.
7.
HuntP.DoeringK.Hirose-HataeA.MaierJ.GoetzL. (2001). Across-program collaboration to support students with and without disabilities in a general education classroom. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 240–256.
8.
HuntP.SotoG.MaierJ.MullerE.GoetzL. (2002). Collaborative teaming to support students with augmentative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 20–36.
IdolL.Paolucci-WhitcombP.NevinA. (1995). The collaborative consultation model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 6, 329–346.
11.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108–446, 20 U.S.C.§1400 et seq.
12.
JacksonL.RyndakD. L.BillingsleyF. (2000). Useful practices in inclusive education: A preliminary view of what experts in moderate to severe disabilities are saying. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 129–141.
13.
LahmE. A.BauschM. E.HasselbringT. S.BlackhurstA. E. (2001). National assistive technology research institute. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(3), 19–26.
14.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
PugachM. C.JohnsonL. J. (1995). Unlocking expertise among classroom teachers through structural dialogue: Extending research on peer collaboration. Exceptional Children, 62, 101–110.
The Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology (QIAT) Consortium. (2004). Quality indicators for assistive technology services: Research-based revisions, 2004. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from http://www.qiat.org.
18.
RainforthB.EnglandJ. (1997). Collaborations for inclusion. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 85–105.
19.
RainforthR.York-BarrJ. (1997). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
20.
SnellM. E.JanneyR. E. (2000). Teachers' problem-solving about children with moderate and severe disabilities in elementary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 66, 472–490.
21.
SotoG.MullerE.HuntP.GoetzL. (2001). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 62–73.
22.
StainbackS. B.StainbackW. C. (1990). Inclusive schooling. In StainbackW. C.StainbackS. B. (Eds.), Support networks for inclusive schooling: Interdependent integrated education (pp. 3–23). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education. (2002, January 17). A high-quality teacher for every classroom. Retrieved December 13, 2005, from http://www.spense.org.
24.
SturmJ. (1998). Educational inclusion of AAC users. In BeukelmanD.MirendaP. (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (pp. 391–424). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
ThousandJ. S.VillaR. A. (2000). Collaborative teaming: A powerful tool in school restructuring. In VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education (2nd ed., pp. 254–291). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). Census bureau regions and divisions with state FIPS codes. Retrieved April 12, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/geo/www/us_regdiv.pdf.
27.
VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S. (2005). Creating an inclusive school (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
28.
VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S.NevinA.ListonA. (2005). Successful inclusive practices in middle and secondary schools. American Secondary Education, 33(3), 33–50.
29.
WallaceT.AndersonA. R.BartholomayT. (2002). Collaboration: An element associated with the success of four inclusive high schools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 13, 349–381.
