The three-year Early Childhood Emergent Literacy Technology Curriculum (ELiTeC) study (E2) was designed to replicate, on a broad scale, the results of earlier research in which a curriculum model was developed, implemented, and studied in preschool classrooms for children with disabilities or those at risk. ELiTeC was based on the assumptions that technologies provide access to literacy activities that benefit children with disabilities and an integrated curriculum approach offers a meaningful context for learning. The original study (E1) encompassed 255 children and 8 teachers over a three-year period. During E2, ELiTeC was replicated in 17 classrooms, with 18 teachers who served 438 children. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. One major goal of E2 was to investigate the implementation and maintenance of the ELiTeC model in multiple settings. Findings of the E2 study demonstrated the importance of allowing adequate time for an innovation to be integrated into practice. The longer teachers used the curriculum model the more positive were the results related to both model fidelity and children's gains in important aspects of literacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BanickyL.FossH. (1999). The challenges of accountability. Newark: University of Delaware, Delaware Education Research and Development Center. College of Human Services, Education, and Public Policy.
3.
BarclayK. (1994, October). Emergent literacy concepts. Paper presented at the meeting of Western Illinois Association for the Education of Young Children, Macomb, IL.
4.
BarclayK.BenelliC.WolfJ. (1996). Me, me, wonderful me!Social Studies and the Young Learner, 9(1), 15–16; 26.
5.
BarclayK.WalwerL. (1992). Linking lyrics and literacy through song picture books. Young Children, 47(4), 76–84.
6.
BehrmannM.LahmE. (1994). Computer applications in early childhood special education. InWrightJ. L.ShadeD. D., (Eds.), Young children: Active learners in a technological age (pp. 105–120). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
7.
BrazeeP.HaynesS. W. (1989). Special education and whole language: From an evaluator's viewpoint. InGoodmanK.GoodmanY. (Eds.), Whole language evaluation (pp. 249–260). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8.
BrettA. (1997). Assistive and adaptive technology supporting competence and independence in young children with disabilities. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 25(3), 14–15, 18–20.
9.
CannonJ. (1993). Stellaluna. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & Company.
10.
CaseyJ. (1997). Early literacy: The empowerment of technology. Englewood, CO: Teacher Ideas Press.
11.
CastellaniJ.JeffsT. (2001). Emerging reading and writing strategies using technology. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33(5), 60–67.
12.
Center for Best Practices in Early Childhood and Center for Applied Information Technology (Producers). (2001). Your preschool classroom computer center: How does it measure up? [video]. (Available from The Center for Best Practices in Early Childhood, 27 Horrabin Hall, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455).
13.
ClayM. M. (1975). What did I write?Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14.
ClayM.M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Educational Books.
15.
ClementsD. H.NastasiB. K.SwaminathanS. (1993). Young children and computers: Crossroads and directions from research. Young Children, 48(2), 56–64.
16.
CousinP.T.WeekleyT.GerardJ. (1993). The functional uses of language and literacy by students with severe language and learning problems. Language Arts, 70, 548–556.
17.
CutlerC.StoneE. (1988). A whole language approach: Teaching reading and writing to behaviorally disordered children. Teaching: Behaviorally Disordered Youth, 4, 31–39.
18.
DererK.PolsgroveL.ReithH. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(2), 62–80.
19.
DysonA.H. (1982). Reading, writing, and language: Young children solving the written language puzzle. Language Arts, 59, 829–839.
20.
EhriL.C.NunesS.R.WillowsD.M.SchusterB.V.Yaghoub-ZadehZ.ShanahanT., (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250–287.
21.
ElmoreR.F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.
22.
EricksonK.KoppenhaverD. (1995). Developing a literacy program for children with severe disabilities. The Reading Teacher, 48, 676–684.
GodtP.HutingerP.RobinsonL.SchneiderC. (1999). A simple strategy to encourage emergent literacy in young children with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(2), 38–44.
27.
GoodmanK. (1982). Revaluing readers and reading. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 1(4), 87–93.
GordonA.BrownK. (Eds.). (1996). Beginning and beyond: Foundations in early childhood education (4th ed.). Albany, NY: Delmar.
30.
GurganusS.JanasM.SchmittL. (1995). Science instruction: What special education teachers need to know and what roles they need to play. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(4), 7–9.
31.
GuskeyT. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.
32.
HarsteJ. C.WoodwardV. A.BurkeC. L. (1984). Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
HutingerP. (1996). Computer application in programs for young children with disabilities: Recurring themes. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(2), 105–114.
36.
HutingerP.BeardM.BellC.BondJ.RobinsonL.SchneiderC.TerryC. (2001). eMERGing literacy and technology: Working together (Rev. ed.). Macomb: Western Illinois University, Center for Best Practices in Early Childhood.
37.
HutingerP.BellC.BeardM.BondJ.JohansonJ.TerryC. (1998). Early childhood emergent literacy and technology: Final report. Macomb: Western Illinois University, Macomb Projects. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED418545).
38.
HutingerP.BellC.DaytnerG.JohansonJ. (2005). Disseminating and Replicating an effective emerging literacy technology curriculum: A final report. Macomb: Western Illinois University, Center for Best Practices in Early Childhood. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED489575).
39.
HutingerP.BellC.JohansonJ.McGruderK. (2002). Final report: LitTECH interactive outreach. Macomb: Western Illinois University, Center for Best Practices in Early Childhood. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED469844).
40.
HutingerP.ClarkL. (2000). TEChPLACEs: An Internet community for young children, their teachers, and their families. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(4), 56–63.
HutingerP.JohansonJ. (1998). Software for young children. InJudgeS. L.ParetteP. H. (Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services (pp.76–126). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
44.
HutingerP.JohansonJ. (2000). Implementing and maintaining an effective early childhood comprehensive technology system. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(3), 159–173.
45.
HutingerP.JohansonJ.StoneburnerR. (1996). Assistive technology applications in education programs of children with multiple disabilities: A case study report on the state of practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8(1), 16–35.
46.
HutingerP.RobinsonL.SchneiderC.JohansonJ. (2002). The early childhood interactive technology literacy curriculum project: Final report. Macomb: Western Illinois University, Center for Best Practices in Early Childhood. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 468324).
47.
JudgeS. L. (Winter 2001). Computer applications in programs for young children with disabilities: Current status and future directions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(1), 29–40.
48.
KataokaJ. C.LockR. (1995). Whales and hermit crabs: Integrated programming and science. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(4), 17–21.
49.
KatimsD.S. (1991). Emergent literacy in early childhood special education: Curriculum and instruction. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11(1), 69–84.
50.
KatzL. G.ChardS. C. (2000). Engaging children's minds: The project approach (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
51.
KoppenhaverD.A.EricksonK.A. (1998, March). Technologies to support reading comprehension in children with disabilities. Paper presented at California State University Northridge 1998 Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
52.
MaeersM.BrowneN.CooperE. (2000). Pedagogically appropriate integration of informational technology in an elementary preservice teacher education program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 219–229.
53.
MasonJ.AllenJ. B. (1986). A review of emergent literacy with implications for research and practice in reading. Review of Research in Education, 13, 3–47.
54.
MerblerJ. B.HadadinA.UlmanJ. (1999). Using assistive technology in the inclusive classroom. Preventing School Failure, 43(3), 113–117.
55.
McGeeL. M.LomaxR. G. (1990). On combining apples and oranges: A response to Stahl and Miller. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 133–140.
56.
MorrowL. M.CaseyH.HaworthC. (2003). Staff development for early literacy teachers. InBaroneD. M.MorrowL. M., (Eds.), Literacy and young children: Research-Based practices (pp. 3–22). New York: The Guilford Press.
57.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1996). Guidelines for preparation of early childhood professionals. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
NeumanS.RoskosK. (1997). Literacy knowledge in practice: Contexts of participation for young writers and readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(1), 10–32.
59.
PattonJ. R. (1995). Teaching science to students with special needs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(4), 4–6.
PierceP.PorterP. (1996). Helping persons with disabilities to become literate using assistive technology: Practice and policy suggestions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(3), 142–146, 162.
62.
SandallS.HemmeterM.L.SmithB.McLeanM.E. (Eds.). (2005). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
63.
SchlosserR. W.McGhie-RichmonD.Blackstien-AdlerS. (2000). Training a school team to integrate technology meaningfully into the curriculum: Effects on student participation. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 31–44.
64.
SmithS. J.JonesE. D. (1999). The obligation to provide assistive technology: Enhancing the general curriculum access. Journal of Law and Education, 28(2), 247–265.
65.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
66.
StahlS.A. (1998). Saying the “p” word: Nine guidelines for exemplary phonics instruction. InAllingtonR.L., (Ed.), Teaching struggling readers (pp. 208–216). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
67.
StricklandD. S. (1990). Emergent literacy: How young children learn to read and write. Educational Leadership, 47(6), 18–23.
68.
StricklandD.Riley-AyersS. (April, 2006). Early literacy: Policy and practice in the preschool years. A Preschool Policy Brief, 10. Retrieved on May 1, 2006, from http://nieer.org/resources/policybrief/10.pdf.
69.
SulzbyE. (1986). Writing and reading: Signs of oral and written language organization in the young child. InTealeW.H.SulzbyE. (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Understanding reading and writing (pp. 50–89). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
70.
SulzbyE. (1988). A study of children's early reading development. InPelligriniA.D. (Ed.), Psychological bases for early education (pp. 39–75). Chichester, England: Wiley.
71.
SulzbyE. (1990). Assessment of emergent writing and children's language while writing. InMorrowL. M.SmithJ. K. (Eds.), Assessment for instruction in early literacy (pp. 83–108). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
72.
TealeW.H.SulzbyE. (1986). Emergent literacy as a perspective for examining how young children become writers and readers. InTealeW.H.SulzbyE. (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. vii–xxv). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
73.
ToomeyD. (1991). Working with pre-school teachers and parents to improve the emergent literacy competence of four year olds in a disadvantaged locality. (Report No. PS 121486). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344673).
74.
VannattaR. (2000). Evaluation to planning: Technology integration in a school of education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 231–246.
75.
WrightJ.ShadeD. (Eds.). (1994). Young children: Active learners in a technological age. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
