ArmbrusterB. B.AndersonT. H. (1984). Structures of explanations in history textbooks, or so what if Governor Stanford missed the spike and hit the rail?Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16, 247–274.
2.
BosterF. J.MeyerG. S.RobertoA. J.IngeC. C. (2002, August). A Report on the effect of the Unitedstreaming application on educational performance. United Learning. August.
3.
BottgeB. A.WatsonE. A. (2002). Using video-based math problems to connect the skills and understandings of incarcerated adults with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17, 25–38.
4.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). Anchored instruction in science and mathematics: Theoretical basis, developmental projects, and initial research findings. InDuschlR. A.HamiltonR. J. (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 244–273). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
FerrettiR. P.MacArthurC. D.OkoloC. M. (2001). Teaching for historical understanding in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 59–65.
7.
FisherW. W.McGeveranW. (2006, August). The digital learning challenge: Obstacles to educational uses of copyrighted materials in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: Beckman Center for Internet and Society. Online: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/research_publication_series.
8.
GerstenR.BakerS. K.Smith-JohnsonJ.DiminoJ.PetersonA. (2006). Eyes on the prize: Teaching complex historical content to middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 264–280.
9.
GlaserC. W.RiethH. J.KinzerC. K.ColburnL. K.PeterJ. (1999). A description of the impact of multimedia anchored instruction on classroom interactions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(2), 27–43.
HobanC. F.VanOrmerE. B. (1951, October). Instructional film research, 1918–1950. Technical Report No. SDC-269-7-10. Port Washington, NY: Special Devices Center.
12.
MayerR. E.GalliniJ. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(6), 715–726.
13.
ParisM. J. (1997). Integrating film and television into social studies instruction. ERIC Digest. ED 415177.
14.
PasseJ.BeattieJ. (1994). Social studies instruction for students with mild disabilities: A progress report. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 227–233.
RiethH. J.BryantD. P.KinzerC. K.ColburnL.HurS.HartmanP.ChoiH. S. (2003). An analysis of the impact of anchored instruction on teaching and learning activities in two ninth grade classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 173–184.
17.
RileyR. W.HollemanF.S.RobertsL.G. (1999, December). E-learning: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children. Washington, D. C.: United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.
18.
RobertsD. F.FoehrU. G.RideoutV. (2005, March). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year olds. Kaiser Family Foundation.
19.
SchumakerJ. B.BulgrenJ. A.DavisB.GrossenB.MarquisJ.DeshlerD. D.LenzK. B. (2002). The educational context and outcomes for high school students with disabilities: General education classes and the satisfaction of general education teachers. Research Report. Lawrence, KS, University of Kansas, Institute for Academic Access.
20.
ThormanE.JollsT. (2005). Literacy for the 21st Century: An overview and orientation guide to media literacy education. Santa Monica, CA: Center for Media Literacy. Online: http://www.medialit.org.
21.
ThornhillS.AsensioM.YoungC. (2002). Video Streaming: A guide for educational development. Manchester, England: Click and Go Video.