Content-Area Applications

Abell M. Bauder D. Simmons T. (2004). Universally designed online assessment: Implications for the future. Information Technology and Disabilities, 10(1). Retrieved March 19, 2006, from http://www.rit.edu/∼easi/itd/itdv10n1/abell.htm.

Barlow C. L. Wetherill K. S. (2005). Technology + imagination = results. T.H.E. Journal, 33, 20–22, 24, 26. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://www.thejournal.com.

Branstad T. Acosta A. Bartlett S. Berdine W. Butterfield P. Chambers J. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Department of Education.

Calhoon M. B. Fuchs L. S. (2003). The effects of peer assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 235–245.

Carr S. Young J. R. (1999). As distance-learning boom spreads, colleges help set up virtual high school. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(9), A55–A58.

Christie K. (2002). Online assessment: Moving beyond “Gotcha.” Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 426, 483–484.

Cotton K. (1988). Monitoring student learning in the classroom. Close-Up #4. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratories. Retrieved February 16, 2006, from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/2/cu4.html.

Cuban L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Daniels A. (2004). Composition instruction: Using technology to motivate students to write. Information Technology in Childhood Education, 1, 157–174.

Deno S. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.

Deubel P. (2006). Game On! T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/17788.

Dolan R. P. Hall T. E. (2001). Universal design for learning: Implications for large scale assessment. IDA Perspectives, 27(4), 22–25.

Espin C. Shin J. Busch T. W. (2005). Curriculum-based measurement in the content areas: Vocabulary matching as an indicator of progress in social studies learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 353–363.

Fuchs L. Fuchs D. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement: A best practice guide. NASP Communiqué, 32(2). Retrieved January 18, 2006, from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq322cbminsert.html.

Galley M. (2001). South Dakota aims to put online assessment to the test. Education Week, 20, 21.

Graduate Record Examination (n.d.). ETS.org . Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.435c0b5cc7bd0ae7015d9510c3921509/?vgnextoid=b195e3b5f64f4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD.

Hecker L. Burns L. Elkind J. Elkind K. Katz L. (2002). Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 243–272.

IDEA (1997). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 to 1491.

IDEA (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 to 1482.

Killion J. (2005). Improving classroom assessment. Principal Leadership, 6, 51–52.

Kovaleski J. Prasse D. P. (2004). Response to instruction in the identification of learning disabilities: A guide for school teams. NASP Communiqué, 32(5). Retrieved January 18, 2006, from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq325instruction.html.

LaFee S. (2001). Online education may be the catalyst for fundamental reform in the view of futurists. The School Administrator. Retrieved January 21, 2006, from http://www.aasa.org/publications/saarticledetail.cfm?ItemNumber=3296.

Martson D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 539–544.

NCLB (2002). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425.

Object Planet. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/.

Özden M. Y. Erturk I. Sanli R. (2004). Students' perception of online assessment: A case study. Journal of Distance Education, 19, 77–93.

Pappas P. Pearson J. (1999). Taking a skills SNAPSHOT: Employing online self-assessments. Multimedia Schools, 6(3), 16–19.

Parsad B. Jones J. Greene B. (2005). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.

Quenemoen R. Thurlow M. Moen R. Thompson S. Morse A. B. (2004). Progress monitoring in an inclusive standards-based assessment and accountability system (Synthesis Report 53). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Quia. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.quia.com/.

QuizStar. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://quizstar.4teachers.org/.

Quiz Center (n.d.). Discovery Education. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://school.discovery.com/quizcenter/quizcenter.html.

Quiz Lab. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.quizlab.com/.

Roberts D. F. Foehr U. G. Rideout V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Sølvberg A. M. (2003). Computer-related control beliefs and motivation: A panel study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 473–487.

Stock S. E. Davies D. K. Wehmeyer M. L. (2004). Internet-based multimedia tests and surveys for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 43–47.

SuperSurvey. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.supersurvey.com/.

Survey Monkey. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.surveymonkey.com/.

Thomas D. (1989). The “I Can Write” project. Computers in the Schools, 6, 133–140.

Zoomerang. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.zoomerang.com/.