This paper analyzes the intersection of technology and diversity in classrooms with reference to the implications of the inequity of access and usage for under-represented groups including low-income, minority students, students from culturally diverse backgrounds, students with disabilities, and female students. Strategies at national and individual levels to facilitate a process of digital inclusion for all children are identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Assistive Technology Act of 2004, 29 U.S.C. §3001 et seq.
2.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.
3.
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U. S. C. §122101 et seq.
4.
BeckerH. J. (2000). Access to classroom computers. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 43(6), 24–25.
5.
BeckerH. J.RavitzJ. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers' pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 356–385.
6.
BennettD.BrunnerC.HoneyM. (1999). Gender and technology: Designing for diversity. New York, NY: Center for Children and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 450188).
7.
BergstahlerS. (2001). Bridging the digital divide in postsecondary education: Technology access for youth with disabilities. Information Brief, 1(2), 1–4.
8.
BergstahlerS. (2002, March). Distance learning: Eliminating the digital divide. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, TN.
9.
BlauA. (2002). Access isn't enough: Merely connecting people and computers won't close the digital divide. American Libraries, 33(6), 50–52.
10.
CarvinA. (2000). Mind the gap: The digital divide as the civil rights issue of the new millennium. Multimedia Schools, 7(1), 56–59.
11.
CooperK. B.VictoryN. J. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
12.
CullenR. (2001, August). Addressing the digital divide. Paper presented at the Conference of the Information and Foreign Languages Association (IFLA), Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 459714).
13.
GorskiP. C. (2005). Multicultural education and the Internet: Intersections and integrations (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
14.
Groendal-CobbJ.PattersonJ. (2002, March). Gender bias in software: Issues, implications and considerations. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, TN.
15.
GuiceA. A.McCoyL. P. (2001, April). The digital divide in Native American tribal schools: Two case studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
16.
HargittaiE. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4), 1–20.
17.
HinsonJ.DanielC. (2001, June). Connecting across many divides: Digital, racial, and socio-economic. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Chicago, IL.
18.
HughesB.CoyneP. (1996, October). Meeting the needs of 21st century literacy by using computers in family literacy circles. Paper presented at the National Reading Research Conference on Literacy and Technology for the 21st Century, Boston, MA.
19.
JacksonV. L. (2003). Technology and special education: Bridging the most recent digital divide. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 479685).
20.
WangC. Y. Janey (2001, November). Handshakes in cyberspace: Bridging the cultural differences through effective intercultural communication and collaboration. Paper presented at National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Atlanta, GA.
21.
KatsinasS. G.MoeckP. (2002). The digital divide and rural community colleges: Problems and prospects. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26, 207–224.
22.
KayeH. S. (2000). Disability and the digital divide. Disability Statistics Abstract, 22, 1–4.
23.
KirmaniM. H. (1992). Getting girls into the classroom: Four strategies using technology. African Technology Forum, 5(2), 20–21.
24.
KirmaniM. H. (1995). Global agenda on education for all by the year 2000: Strategies using technology to reduce gender inequalities in education. Towson, MD: Towson University Press.
25.
KirmaniM. H.HardiskyM. (2003). Young children surfing the Internet. Manuscript in preparation.
26.
Kirova-PetrovaA.BhargavaA.McNairS. (1999). Moving towards the 21st century: Eliminating gender biases in young children's use of computers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 430685).
27.
KramaraeC. (2001). The third shift: Women learning online. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
28.
LittonE. F. (2002, March). Bridging the digital divide: A school's success story. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, TN.
29.
MaleckiE. J. (2003). Digital development in rural areas: Potentials and pitfalls. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 201–214.
30.
MartinS. P.LittonE. F. (2001, March). Technology and social change: Perceptions of culturally diverse students. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, TN.
31.
MeadowsM. (2001, March). Using technology in early childhood environments to strengthen cultural connections. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, TN.
32.
Menard-WarwickJ.DabachD. B. (2002, April). A digital divide? Class and gender in the computer practices of two Mexicano families. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
33.
MeyerA.RoseD. H. (2000). Universal design for individual differences. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 39–43.
34.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1995). Falling through the Net: A survey of the “have nots” in rural and urban America. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html.
35.
National Education Association. (1997). Technology for diverse learners. West Haven, CT: National Education Association Professional Library.
36.
NelG.WilkinsonL. (2001, March). Where is the ‘any key’, sir? Experiences of an African teacher-to-be. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, TN.
37.
ParetteH. P.BrothersonM. J. (2004). Family-centered and culturally responsive assistive technology decision making. Infants and Young Children, 17, 355–367.
38.
PearsonT. (2001, November). Falling behind: A technology crisis facing minority students. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Atlanta, GA.
39.
PearsonT.SwainC. (2001, March). The digital divide in schools: We can make a difference. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, TN.
40.
RaoS.KalyanpurM. (2001). Promoting home-school collaboration in positive behavior support. InLucyshynJ. M.DunlapG.AlbinR. W. (Eds.), Families and positive behavior support (pp. 219–239). Baltimore: Brookes.
41.
RoseD.MeyerA. (2000). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. Peabody, MA: Center for Applied Special Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 451624).
42.
ShapiroR. J.RohdeG. L. (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion, a report on Americans' access to technology tools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
43.
ShinA. (January 30, 2005). Senior citizens begin to discover Internet living. Washington Post, F1, 6.
44.
SingletonS.MastM. (2000). How does the empty glass fill? A modern philosophy of the digital divide. Educause Review, 35(6), 29–36.
45.
SwainC.PearsonT. (2003). Educators and technology standards: Influencing the digital divide. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 326–335.
46.
ThornthwaiteC. (2001, March). Technology empowers a diverse population of students: Results from a technology professional development school. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, TN.
47.
WilhelmT.CarmenD.ReynoldsM, (2002). Connecting kids to technology: Challenges and opportunities. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 467133).
48.
ZehrM. A. (2001). Language barriers. Education Week, 20(35), 28–30.
