Assistive technology consideration and implementation is often limited by the technology experience and knowledge of the education professionals involved in the process. The creation of a toolkit containing highly useful technologies may assist education professionals in this process. This article discusses a systematic method for creating a technology toolkit for use with students having mental retardation. Implications and future directions are discussed.
AndersonC. L.Petch-HogamB. (2001). The impact of technology use in special education field experience on preservice teachers' perceived technology expertise. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(3), 27–44.
3.
Apple Computer, Inc. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning, & technology: A Report on 10 Years of ACOT Research. Cupertino, CA: Author.
4.
Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System. (2003). About the ATOMS project. Retrieved September 3, 2003, from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/atoms/about/.
5.
Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System. (2004, January). ATOMS town hall meeting. Emerging plans for measuring the outcomes of assistive technology. Orlando, FL.
6.
Association for Retarded Citizens. (1991). Assistive technology for people with mental retardation. Retrieved April 26, 2004, from http://www.thearc.org/faqs/assistqa.html.
7.
BamberaL. M.AgerC. (1992). Using self-scheduling to promote self-directed leisure activity in home and community settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 67–76.
8.
BeukelmanD. R.MirendaP. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Brookes.
9.
BowserG.ReedP. (1995). Education TECH points for assistive technology planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12 (4), 325–338.
CostelloJ.ShaneH. (1994, November). Augmentative communication assessment and the feature matching process. Miniseminar presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, New Orleans.
17.
DaviesD. K.StockS. E.WehmeyerM. L. (2002). Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a palmtop personal computer. Mental Retardation, 40, 358–365.
18.
DaviesD.StockS.WehmeyerM. L. (2001). Enhancing independent Internet access for individuals with mental retardation through the use of a specialized web browser: A pilot study. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 107 - 113.
19.
DererK.PolsgroveL.RiethH. (1996). A survey of assistive technology disabilities. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved April 3, 2004, from http://ericec.org/minibibs/marchives/eb16.html.
20.
EdyburnD. L. (2000a). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(9), 1–23.
21.
EdyburnD. L. (2000b). 1999 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 7–18.
22.
EdyburnD. L. (2002). Remediation vs. compensation: A critical decision point in assistive technology consideration, ConnSense Bulletin, 4(3). Retrieved April 27, 2004, from http://www.connsensebulletin.com/edyburnv4n3.html.
23.
EdyburnD. L. (2004, January). Assistive and instructional technology for students with mild disabilities. Presentation to the Assistive Technology Industry Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL. Retrieved April 3, 2004, from http://www.atia.org/2004_presentations/1418_Edyburn.pdf.
24.
EdyburnD. L.GardnerJ.E. (1998). The use of technology to enhance professional productivity. In LindseyJ. (Ed.). Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed., pp. 161–189). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
25.
Fenema-JansenS.EdyburnD. L. (1998). Essential tools of the trade: An occupational therapist shares her tool kit. Closing The Gap, 17(4), 8–9, 32–33, 40.
26.
GardnerJ. E.EdyburnD. L. (2000). Integrating technology to support effective instruction. In LindseyJ. D. (Ed.), Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed., pp. 191–240). Austin: Pro-ed.
27.
GlennenS. L. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication assessment strategies. In GlennenS. L.DeCosteD. C. (Eds.) Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (149–192). San Diego, CA: Singular.
28.
GliddenL. M.AbbedutoL. (Eds.). (2003). International review of research in mental retardation volume 27. Language and communication in mental retardation. Boston: Academic Press.
HoltK.EdyburnD. L. (1998). Essential tools of the trade: A speech language pathologist shares her tool kit. Closing The Gap, 17(2), 11, 30, 33.
31.
IaconoT.MillerJ. (1989). Can microcomputers be used to teach communication skills to students with mental retardation?Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24, 32–44.
32.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P. L. 105–17. (June 4, 1997). 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
33.
Institute for Matching Person and Technology. (2004). Matching person and technology. Retrieved October 19, 2004, from http://members.aol.com/IMPT97/MPT.html.
34.
JudgeS. L.ParetteH. P. (Eds.). (1998). Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
35.
KaplanM. W.EdyburnD. L. (1998). Essential tools of the trade: An assistive technology specialist shares her tool kit. ClosingThe Gap, 17(3), 1, 8, 18, 24.
36.
KeyesG. K., (1994). The time on computer program. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 20–23.
37.
KingT. W. (1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
38.
KoppenhaverD. A.PierceP. L. (1994, August). Written language research in AAC. Paper presented to the 1994 ISAAC Research Symposium, Kerkrade, The Netherlands.
39.
LahmE. A.BauschM. E.HasselbringT. S.BlackhurstA. E. (2001). National assistive technology research institute. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 19–26.
LesarS. (1998). Use of assistive technology with young children with disabilities: Current status and training needs. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 146–159.
42.
McGregorG.PachuskiP. (1996). Assistive technology in schools: Are teachers ready, able, and supported?Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 4–15.
MelicharJ. F.BlackhurstA. E. (1993). Introduction to a functional approach to assistive technology [Training Module]. Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation Counseling, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
45.
National Assistive Technology Research Institute. (2003). NATRI home page. Retrieved April 27, 2004, from http://natri.uky.edu/.
46.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1997). Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Retrieved December 4, 2001, from http://www.ncate.org/accred/projects/tech/tech21.htm.
47.
OkoloC. M. (2000). Technology for individuals with mild disabilities. In LindseyJ. D. (Ed.), Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed., pp. 243–301). Austin: Pro-ed.
48.
ParetteH. P. (1997). Assistive technology devices and services. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 267–280.
49.
ParetteH. P. (2004, April). Millennial children in a digital age: Assistive technology futures in special education. Paper presented to the Council for Exceptional Children Annual Convention and Expo, New Orleans.
50.
ParetteH. P.HuerM. B.SchererM. (2004). Effects of acculturation on assistive technology service delivery. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), 31–41.
51.
ParetteH. P.VanBiervlietA.WojcikB. (2004). Assistive technology for all teachers. Grant submitted to the U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
52.
ParetteP.SchererM. J. (2004). Assistive technology use and stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(3), 217–226.
53.
PiersonM. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 413–430.
RomskiM.A.SevcikR.A.AdamsonL.B. (1999). Communication patterns of youth with mental retardation with and without their speech-output communication devices. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104, 249–259.
56.
SEIR-TEC. (2001). Factors influencing the effective use of technology for teaching and learning: Lessons learned. Durham, NC: Author.
57.
ThompsonJ. R.SiegelJ.KouzoukasS. (2000). Assistive technology on the eve of the 21st century: Teacher perceptions. Special Education Technology Practice, 2 (3), 12–21.
WattsE. H.ThompsonJ. R.WojcikB. W. (2003, April). Tub O'Tools. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.
60.
WattsE. H.ThompsonJ. R.WojcikB. W. (2004, April). Tub O'Tools II. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Annual Conference. New Orleans, LA.
61.
WehmeyerM. L. (1998). National survey of the use of assistive technology by adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 36(2), 44–51.
62.
WehmeyerM. L. (1999). Assistive technology for students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(1), 48–58.
WojcikB.Peterson-KarlanG.WattsE.ParetteP. (2004). Assistive technology outcomes in a teacher education curriculum. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1, 21–32.
65.
YorkstonK.KarlanG. (1986). Assessment procedures. In BlackstoneS. (Ed.). Augmentative communication: An introduction. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Hearing-Language Association.
66.
ZabalaJ. (1995, March). The SETT framework: Critical areas to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions. Paper presented at the Florida Assistive Technology Impact Conference and Technology and Medial Division of Council for Exceptional Children, Orlando, FL.
