EdyburnD.L. (2002). Cognitive rescaling strategies: Interventions that alter the cognitive accessability of text. Closing the Gap, April/May, 1, 10–11, 21.
2.
Fennema-JansenS. (2001). Measuring effectiveness: Technology to support writing. Special Education Technology Practice, 3(1), 16–22.
3.
GrahamS.HarrisK.R., & LarsenL. (2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 74–84.
4.
IckeN.PerellaR., & TempleC. (2001). You can talk to your computer, but will it listen?Closing the Gap, 20(3), 1, 20–21.
5.
KerrS.T. (1996). Technology and the future of schooling: Ninety-fifth yearbook of the national society for the study of education, part II. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, ILL.
6.
LaineC., & SitkoM. (2001). Using computer assisted writing in inclusive settings. Closing the Gap, 20(1), 1, 12, 31.
7.
LankutisT. (2001). Reaching the struggling reader. Technology and Learning, 21(10), 24–32.
8.
McCrayA.D.VaughnS., & NealL.I. (2001). Not all students learn to read by third grade: Middle school students speak out about their reading disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 35, 17–30.
9.
Microsoft Word. [Computer program]. (2001). Microspft Corp.
10.
MoffittM., & StemachJ. (2001). Using the computer for teaching literacy to older, struggling readers. Closing the Gap, 20(3), 1, 8–9.
11.
MortensenS.K. (2000). Technology enhanced writing environments: How does technology impact behavior and academic performance of students with emotional disturbances? Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee.
12.
StemachJ. (2001). Evaluating text for older, struggling readers. Closing the Gap, 20(2), 1, 22, 30.