BeigelA. R. (2000). Assistive technology assessment: More than the device. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(4), 237–243.
2.
Disability Statistics Abstract. (1996). Disabilities among children, No. 15, March 1996. United States Department of Education and the National Institute on Disability Rehabilitation Research: WengerB. L.KayeH. S., & LaPlanteM. P..
3.
KingT. W. (1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
LahmE. A., & NickelsB. L. (1999). Assistive technology competencies for special educators. The Council for Exceptional Children, 32(1), 56–63.
5.
LaPlanteM. P. (1990). Who counts as having a disability? Musings on the meaning and prevalence of disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 15–17.
6.
MaleM. (1997). Technology for inclusion: Meeting the special needs of all students. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
ParetteP.VanBiervlietA., & HourcadeJ. J. (2000). Family-centered decision making in assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 45–55.
8.
SchererM. J. (1998). The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabilities. In FlippoK. F.IngeK. J., & BarcusJ. M. (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9.
SchererM. J. (2000). Living in the state of stuck. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
10.
TanchakT. L., & SawyerC. (1995). Augmentative communication. In FlippoK. F.IngeK. J., & BarcusJ. M. (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
11.
WestbrookM. T.LeggeV., & PennayM. (1993). Attitudes towards disabilities in a multicultural society. Social Science Medicine, 36(5), 615–623.